Suped

DMARCEye vs DMARCPal

Choose DMARCEye for transparent pricing, DMARCPal for essential DMARC needs.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCEye impresses us with its AI-powered DMARC report analysis, a feature available across all its paid plans. This helps streamline the often-complex task of interpreting DMARC data, making it more accessible even for those who aren't deep into email protocol specifics.
Beyond core reporting, DMARCEye offers smart alerts and email notifications for its Scale and Enterprise users, ensuring we stay informed about critical domain security events. It also includes integrations for Slack and Teams, which is a definite plus for collaborative environments, and supports multiple accounts for managing various client or departmental needs.
DMARCPal's Lite plan focuses on providing access to email provider reports, which forms the fundamental basis of any DMARC monitoring solution. It's a no-frills approach, catering to users who are already proficient with DMARC, SPF, and DKIM, essentially offering the raw data.
The Standard plan expands this by adding a suite of tools for DMARC implementation and debugging, which we found particularly useful for troubleshooting common configuration issues. Their Premium plan further enhances this with advanced tools, notably including email alerts for broken DNS records, a crucial feature for proactive maintenance.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCEye prides itself on ease of use, designing its platform with the end-user in mind, even for those not deeply tech-savvy. Our experience aligns with this, finding the interface intuitive, especially with its AI-powered insights simplifying complex DMARC errors.
While the underlying DMARC errors can still be tricky (a common industry challenge), DMARCEye's presentation helps demystify the data. The setup process is straightforward, and navigating reports and alerts is generally a smooth experience.
DMARCPal's user experience caters primarily to what they describe as 'tech-savvy individuals and IT teams.' This suggests a steeper learning curve or an expectation of prior DMARC knowledge, particularly for the Lite plan which offers basic reporting tools.
While robust for those who know their way around DMARC, we found that newcomers might initially feel overwhelmed. The focus on debugging tools in higher tiers is certainly valuable, but the overall interface seems geared towards experts rather than simplifying the journey for less experienced users.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCEye offers community support across all plans, which is a good baseline for general queries. For Scale and Enterprise users, they upgrade to priority support, which significantly improves response times and access to more specialized assistance.
The Enterprise plan goes a step further, providing 24/7 phone support, an SLA guarantee, and a dedicated account manager. This tiered approach means that larger organizations can expect a very high level of personalized and responsive support, which is reassuring.
DMARCPal's support information isn't as explicitly detailed in the provided materials as DMARCEye's. We can infer that for the Lite and Standard plans, support would likely be more self-service or community-based, given their focus on tech-savvy users.
While the premium plan offers advanced features like email alerts for broken DNS records, the specific channels and availability of human support, such as priority queues or phone support, are not clearly outlined. Users considering DMARCPal should inquire about their specific support offerings.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCEye is highly suitable for a broad range of users. The Basic plan is perfect for SMBs managing a single domain, offering essential monitoring at an affordable price. Its ease of use and AI-powered insights make it a good fit for businesses without dedicated email security teams.
For MSPs and larger enterprises, the Scale and Enterprise plans provide multi-domain management, priority support, and advanced features like API access and dedicated account managers, making it a robust choice for managing extensive domain portfolios and client accounts.
DMARCPal's Lite plan is best suited for tech-savvy individuals or very small SMBs who are comfortable with the nuances of DMARC and primarily need basic report access without much hand-holding. It’s an ideal choice if you already have the internal expertise.
The Standard and Premium plans appeal more to IT teams and potentially smaller MSPs who require debugging tools and specific alerts for DNS records. It might be less suitable for large enterprises or MSPs needing extensive multi-tenancy or a more managed service approach, as these features are not prominently highlighted.

How does DMARCEye compare with DMARCPal?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCEye has generally positive feedback, with its main drawback being the inherent complexity of DMARC errors themselves, rather than a flaw in the product's interface. DMARCPal, on the other hand, lacks public reviews, making it harder to identify specific user-reported drawbacks beyond what we've inferred about its target audience.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
A seamless DMARC monitoring experience
What do you like best about DmarcEye? Ease of Use: DMARCeye is engineered with the end-user in mind, making it an ideal choice for those who are not necessarily tech-savvy. What do you dislike about DmarcEye? Sometimes it might be hard to understand DMARC errors, but I guess this is more of a DMARC problem itself. What problems is DmarcEye solving and how is that benefiting you? DMARCeye makes it easy to monitor and understand DMARC reports.
Jan P.
Programmer Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

DMARCEye offers transparent, tiered pricing based on domains or a fixed fee, while DMARCPal's specific pricing details are not publicly available and require direct inquiry.
Logo
Logo
Small
$5/month (billed annually)
Contact for pricing
Medium
From $4/domain/month (billed annually)
Contact for pricing
Large
From $4/domain/month (billed annually)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
From $300/month
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCEye or DMARCPal?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARCEye vs DMARCPal DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped