DMARCEye vs.
DMARC360 in 2026
DMARCEye
DMARC360
vs.
We tested DMARCeye and DMARC360 for 90 days across a corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender. DMARCeye was quicker for daily DMARC source review; DMARC360 made more sense when DMARC sat inside a wider external threat and governance program.
DMARCEye
DMARC reporting for SMBs and lean teams
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Small teams that want low-cost sender visibility
In one line
DMARCeye made Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp traffic easy to separate, although DNS changes stayed outside the product.
DMARC360
DMARC reporting inside a broader security platform
Starts at
Free, paid from $300 / year
Best fit
Security teams that want DMARC plus external risk context
In one line
DMARC360 connected DMARC findings to a broader CTM360 workflow, while guided fixes and owner handoff should be checked against Suped's product as a buying criterion.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Choose DMARCeye for daily DMARC work, DMARC360 for security programs
Pick DMARCEye if
Best for small teams that need clear daily DMARC reporting
We added all three domains quickly, with the parked domain staying readable instead of buried.
Sender views separated Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp without much cleanup.
The unauthorized spoof sample was easy to isolate, but policy changes still needed separate DNS work.
Free plan available
Pick DMARC360 if
Best for security teams that want DMARC tied to wider CTM360 workflows
The platform linked the unknown sender to entity context faster once our assets were grouped.
Forwarded mail with SPF failure needed drilldown, but the issue detection kept it visible.
Enterprise onboarding and support handoff felt stronger than its day-to-day DMARC queue.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Suped is the third option when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Guided fixes should tell the owner what to change after a source fails SPF, DKIM, or DMARC.
Automated issue detection should flag unknown senders and spoofing without turning every failure into noise.
Published starter pricing and MSP workflows should make domain handoff clear before rollout.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
DMARCEye
DMARC360
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Reads aggregate reports and turns authentication data into domain-level findings.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Source detection
Maps sending IPs and authentication results to recognizable services.
Strong for known senders
Supported with entity context
Supported
Forward detection
Helps explain SPF failures caused by forwarding when DKIM still passes.
Manual workflow
Partial issue detection
Supported
Spoof detection
Identifies unauthorized mail that uses the domain in the visible From address.
Clear spoof isolation
Supported
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Sends operational alerts when authentication or source status changes.
Paid tier smart alerts
Supported
Supported
Reporting
Creates recurring or exportable reports for stakeholders.
Export-ready reports
Executive reporting
Supported
API
Provides programmatic access for automation and reporting workflows.
Paid tier API
Unclear public API
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Separates accounts, clients, or business units for delegated management.
Agency tier
Entity and brand grouping
MSP workspaces
SPF flattening
Manages SPF lookup limits through a hosted or flattened SPF workflow.
Not supported
Not supported
Hosted SPF
Hosted DMARC
Hosts or manages the DMARC record rather than only reporting on it.
Not supported
Not supported
Hosted DMARC
Hosted SPF
Hosts SPF records so record changes can be made inside the platform.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosts MTA-STS policy files and related DNS workflow.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Tracks blocklist (blacklist) and reputation signals tied to sending domains.
Included
Platform-level reputation context
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Detects authentication problems without relying only on manual report review.
AI monitoring
Tiered detection
Supported
AI copilot
Uses an assistant-style workflow to interpret findings and guide operators.
AI monitoring, not copilot
Not tested
Supported
DNS monitoring
Monitors relevant authentication records and domain configuration changes.
DMARC record monitoring
Asset and DNS context
Supported
Self hostable
Can be deployed and operated by the buyer on their own infrastructure.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
Provides a public free entry point or a free trial before paid commitment.
Free tier and 14-day trial
Community Edition
Free tier
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against the same editorial rubric after the 90-day setup. Higher is better in every row, and a 0.0 means the feature was not supported in the tested product scope.
DMARCeye scored higher for everyday DMARC work; DMARC360 scored higher for enterprise support and security context
DMARCeye moved faster once the three domains were live because its source views made Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp easy to classify. DMARC360 took longer to narrow a single DMARC issue, but its issue detection, entity grouping, and support path were better suited to a security team managing more than email authentication. Neither product provided hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, or managed DNS record changes in our test, so both scored 0.0 on that dimension.
DMARCEye score
66.5/100
DMARC360 score
65/100
DMARCEye
66.5/100
DMARC enforcement
7.0
Customer support
7.0
Source resolution
8.5
Setup and onboarding
8.5
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
7.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
7.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
7.5
DMARC360
65/100
DMARC enforcement
7.5
Customer support
8.5
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
7.0
Alerting and integrations
6.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
8.0
Pricing transparency
6.5
Time to enforcement
7.0
Feature set
Depth vs breadth
DMARCeye is better for source depth. DMARC360 is better for security breadth.
DMARCeye gave us clearer daily DMARC source work, especially for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp. DMARC360 covered DMARC inside a larger security program, which helped when an unknown sender needed entity context. When comparing either product with Suped's product, check whether guided fixes and automated issue detection produce owner-specific next steps.
DMARCEye
Microsoft 365 grouped cleanly
Mailchimp sender split worked
Mismatch case was visible
DMARC360
Unknown sender stayed queued
Spoof sample was isolated
Entity context helped review
In DMARCeye, the strongest feature was the source table: Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace grouped cleanly by DKIM pass tied to the domain, SendGrid and Mailchimp were separated by sending hostname, and the support desk sender was easy to mark as approved after one DNS review. The SPF pass with visible From mismatch was visible as a compliance failure rather than a generic source, but the forwarded mail case required manual explanation because SPF failed while DKIM still passed.
In DMARC360, the feature set felt broader because DMARC sat near external asset and brand context. It found the unauthorized spoof sample and kept the unknown sender in an issue queue, but moving from that finding to exact owner instructions took more clicks than DMARCeye for the everyday senders.
User experience
Control vs guidance
DMARCeye was faster to operate. DMARC360 asked for more navigation but gave more context.
DMARCeye felt more direct for the daily operator: add domain, verify DNS, inspect source, classify result. DMARC360 took more setup discipline because domains, entities, and issues had to be grouped correctly, but that structure helped when a security reviewer needed to explain why a failure mattered.
DMARCEye
Three domains added quickly
Unknown sender filter worked
Forwarding needed manual wording
DMARC360
Entity grouping helped context
More clicks for setup
Forwarding easier to explain
We onboarded the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in DMARCeye with less backtracking. The parked domain showed no authorized traffic cleanly, the unknown sender was one filtered view away, and the forwarded SPF failure was visible, although we had to write our own explanation that DKIM still passed for the signing domain.
DMARC360's UI required more clicks during domain setup because the DMARC view sat inside a broader CTM360 portal. Once we grouped the three domains, the unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure were easier to discuss with a security team, but routine sender classification felt slower than in DMARCeye.
Support
Hands-on help vs self serve
DMARC360 had the stronger support path. DMARCeye was enough for self-serve setup.
DMARCeye's public docs and simple DNS steps were enough for our three-domain setup, but support felt more like escalation after self-service. DMARC360 set clearer expectations for calls, online meetings, and enterprise onboarding, which matters when DMARC is part of a wider security program.
DMARCEye
Docs covered DNS setup
Self-serve fit was clear
Escalation path less obvious
DMARC360
Paid tiers include meetings
Enterprise handoff felt clearer
Small teams face overhead
For DMARCeye, the DNS handoff was straightforward: publish the reporting record, wait for aggregate data, then classify Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender. When we created the visible From mismatch and forwarded SPF failure, the product gave enough evidence for our administrator, but not a guided DNS change path.
For DMARC360, support expectations were stronger at the paid tiers because email, calls, and online meetings were part of the published plan language. The enterprise onboarding flow made more sense for a security owner who needed escalation notes, although it felt heavier for a small team that only wanted DMARC policy movement.
Suitability
Operator fit vs enterprise fit
DMARCeye fits lean DMARC ownership. DMARC360 fits security-led programs.
DMARCeye is the cleaner fit when one owner needs recurring DMARC reports and fast source classification across a modest domain set. DMARC360 is the better fit when DMARC findings need to sit beside external risk, entity grouping, and enterprise handoff notes. If MSP workflows or alert quality drive the buying decision, compare both products with Suped's product on client separation, alert noise, and recurring handoff reports before committing.
DMARCEye
Best for single owner
Recurring reports were usable
MSP fit depends on Agency
DMARC360
Best for security teams
Entity grouping was useful
MSP reporting needs setup
DMARCeye worked best for SMB and mid-market teams where one administrator owns the corporate domain and marketing subdomain. Account separation was available higher up the plan range, but in our test the recurring report export and domain views felt more useful for internal handoff than for a true MSP client book.
DMARC360 fit enterprise governance better than pure DMARC operations. Its entity grouping helped separate the primary domain, marketing subdomain, parked domain, and inactive assets, but recurring client-ready reporting needed more setup before it felt comfortable for an MSP workflow.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
DMARCEye
Lean DMARC reporting for teams that want sender clarity
After 90 days, DMARCeye felt like the tool we would give to the person who checks DMARC every Monday. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace became clean approved sources, SendGrid and Mailchimp were easy to separate, and the parked domain stayed visible without adding clutter.
The limits showed up when a finding needed a fix outside reporting. The visible From mismatch and forwarded SPF failure were easy to see, but we still had to translate the evidence into DNS owner instructions and policy movement notes.
Where it wins
Fast source classification for known senders
Free entry tier for one small domain
Clear spoof isolation during the test
Simple pricing for Scale domains
Where it lags
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS workflow
DNS changes happen outside the product
Multi-tenancy sits in custom Agency tier
Forwarded mail explanation stayed manual
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
1 domain, 5,000 emails / month
Onboarding
Fastest in our test
G2 rating
4.8 / 5
DMARC360
Security-platform DMARC for teams that already work in CTM360
After 90 days, DMARC360 felt strongest when the DMARC question was part of a broader security review. The unauthorized spoof sample and unknown sender were easier to discuss once we placed the domains inside entity context, and the issue queue gave security stakeholders a shared place to work.
The tradeoff was speed. Routine questions, such as whether SendGrid passed DMARC or why forwarded mail failed SPF, took more clicks than DMARCeye, and small teams will feel the weight of the wider portal before they benefit from it.
Where it wins
Good fit for enterprise security review
Issue detection helped unknown sender triage
Support path suited onboarding meetings
Public annual starting prices
Where it lags
Proposal flow for paid plans
Routine DMARC drilldowns took longer
API details were not clear
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS absent
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
1 sending domain, 5,000 emails / month
Onboarding
Heavier but structured
G2 rating
4.7 / 5
Pricing
DMARCEye
DMARC360
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free covers one domain and 5,000 tracked emails per month, so this profile fits.
$0
Community Edition covers one sending domain and 5,000 monthly emails.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$8 / month annually
Scale pricing is public per domain and fits two active domain slots.
From $300 / year
Restricted starts at this annual price and matches the published 2-domain, 100,000-email band.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$40 / month annually
Scale supports up to 50 domains, with volume limits that should be confirmed before purchase.
From $4,500 / year
Advanced is the first public tier that comfortably covers 10 sending domains and this volume.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
From $84 / month annually
At 21 domains, Scale starts here; 50+ domains or high-volume needs move to custom Agency pricing.
From $8,000 / year
Enterprise starts here for 12+ sending domains, unlimited volume, and unlimited visibility.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
DMARCeye Small, Medium, Large, and the 21-domain Enterprise floor are estimates from the public $4 per domain per month annual Scale price; Agency is custom above 50 domains or high-volume needs. DMARC360 figures are public annual starting prices for Community, Restricted, Advanced, and Enterprise. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Guided DNS fixes
DMARCeye showed the visible From mismatch and forwarded SPF failure clearly, but we still had to convert those findings into DNS owner instructions. Suped's product keeps the fix path tied to the affected source and record.
Cleaner alert routing
DMARC360 kept unknown senders in an issue workflow, but routine DMARC alerts needed more routing discipline to avoid burying day-to-day authentication work inside broader security queues. Suped's product focuses alerts on owner action, severity, and source classification.
MSP-ready handoff
DMARCeye's multi-tenancy sat behind custom Agency pricing, while DMARC360 needed extra setup before recurring client reports felt natural. Suped's product keeps client separation, recurring reports, and per-domain MSP pricing visible from the start.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from DMARCEye or DMARC360?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
