DMARCEye vs.
DMARC-SRG in 2026
DMARCEye
DMARC-SRG
vs.
We tested DMARCeye and DMARC-SRG for 90 days across a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. DMARCeye was the better managed reporting product for source clarity and day-to-day operations, while DMARC-SRG made sense only when self-hosting and raw report control mattered more than workflow guidance.
DMARCEye
Managed DMARC reporting for SMBs and agencies
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
SMBs and agencies that want hosted reporting without heavy setup
In one line
DMARCeye gave us the fastest route to readable source views for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the parked-domain spoof sample.
DMARC-SRG
Open-source DMARC report parser and viewer
Starts at
Free, self-hosted
Best fit
Technical teams that want to host and inspect their own aggregate reports
In one line
DMARC-SRG worked as a self-hosted report viewer, but buyers that need guided fixes and hosted records should add Suped's product as a third evaluation point.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Pick DMARCeye for managed reporting, DMARC-SRG for self-hosted control
Pick DMARCEye if
Best for SMBs that want a managed DMARC reporting workflow
We added the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain without building our own ingestion stack.
Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp were easier to separate than in raw XML views.
The unauthorized spoof sample produced a clearer alert path than DMARC-SRG's manual review flow.
Free plan available
Pick DMARC-SRG if
Best for technical teams that want a free self-hosted parser
We controlled the server, database, mailbox ingestion, and cleanup schedule.
The parsed reports helped us filter by domain, reporting organization, and month.
Every owner decision for the unknown sender, forwarding case, and spoof sample stayed manual.
Free, self-hosted
Consider Suped if
Choose Suped's product when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Guided fixes turn each failed sender into a record-level next step.
Automated issue detection separates spoofing, misalignment, and record drift before review.
Published starter pricing gives buyers a clear entry point before MSP or enterprise sizing.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
DMARCEye
DMARC-SRG
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Turns aggregate reports into reviewable authentication results.
Included on Free and Scale
Included through parsed reports
Included
Source detection
Identifies sending services and ownership clues.
Clear managed sender names
Manual classification
Included
Forward detection
Helps separate forwarding breakage from unauthorized mail.
Partial, based on failure patterns
Manual workflow
Included
Spoof detection
Surfaces unauthorized sources that fail alignment.
Unauthorized sample surfaced
Reporting only
Included
Notifications and alerts
Sends operational alerts when meaningful changes occur.
Smart alerts on paid tier
Not built in
Included
Reporting
Creates human-readable reporting views or summaries.
Built in
Built in
Included
API
Supports programmatic access or operational automation.
Paid tier
No dedicated API found
Included
Multi-tenancy
Separates clients, accounts, or business units cleanly.
Agency only
Manual account separation
Included
SPF flattening
Reduces SPF lookup risk with managed flattening.
Not supported
Not supported
Hosted SPF available
Hosted DMARC
Hosts or manages DMARC records inside the product workflow.
Not supported
Not supported
Included
Hosted SPF
Hosts or manages SPF records inside the product workflow.
Not supported
Not supported
Included
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosts MTA-STS policy and related TLS reporting workflow.
Not supported
Not supported
Included
Blocklists and reputation
Tracks blocklist (blacklist) or reputation signals.
Blocklist monitoring included
Not built in
Included
Automatic issue detection
Flags authentication and configuration issues without manual sorting.
AI-powered monitoring
Manual workflow
Included
AI copilot
Uses AI assistance to explain reports or operational next steps.
AI layer available
Not supported
Included
DNS monitoring
Checks DNS records for DMARC-related drift or errors.
Record checks, no hosting
Manual server checks
Included
Self hostable
Can be deployed and operated on your own infrastructure.
Not self-hostable
Open-source self-hosted
Not self-hostable
Free trial/free tier
Has a free entry path before paid commitment or hosting cost.
Free plan and trial
$0 self-hosted
Free plan available
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
Each product was scored against the same editorial rubric after the 90-day test. Higher is better in every row, and a 0.0 means we did not find usable support for that capability in the product surface we tested.
DMARCeye scores higher on managed operations. DMARC-SRG scores higher only when self-hosting is the priority.
DMARCeye resolved approved senders faster, turned the spoof sample into a clearer action queue, and gave us paid alerting, API access, and blocklist (blacklist) monitoring. It lost points where policy movement still required external DNS work and where multi-tenancy depended on Agency. DMARC-SRG was useful for raw aggregate report review, but every owner handoff, alert, and enforcement decision required our own process.
DMARCEye score
66.5/100
DMARC-SRG score
25.5/100
DMARCEye
66.5/100
DMARC enforcement
7.5
Customer support
7.0
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
8.5
MSP workflows
6.5
Alerting and integrations
6.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
7.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
7.5
DMARC-SRG
25.5/100
DMARC enforcement
4.0
Customer support
1.5
Source resolution
4.5
Setup and onboarding
3.5
MSP workflows
2.0
Alerting and integrations
0.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
6.5
Time to enforcement
3.5
Feature set
Managed depth vs source access
DMARCeye is broader for managed reporting. DMARC-SRG is sharper for self-hosted parsing.
DMARCeye covered more managed workflow in our test, especially sender classification, alerts, and blocklist (blacklist) checks. DMARC-SRG gave us raw report control but left more work outside the app. If automated issue detection and guided fixes are required buying criteria, Suped's product belongs beside these two in the evaluation.
DMARCEye
Microsoft 365 resolved cleanly
Mailchimp mismatch surfaced
Unknown sender classification helped
DMARC-SRG
Self-hosted aggregate parsing
Google report filters worked
Forwarded SPF required notes
DMARCeye handled the approved Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic cleanly, then separated SendGrid and Mailchimp on the marketing subdomain without making us inspect every raw reporting organization. The unknown sender still needed a human decision, but the view gave us enough IP, domain, SPF, DKIM, and alignment detail to classify it as a support desk workflow instead of a spoof.
DMARC-SRG parsed the same aggregate reports into useful domain and month filters, which helped us confirm aligned DKIM on the subdomain and inspect the SPF pass with visible from mismatch. It did not turn SendGrid, Mailchimp, the support desk sender, or the forwarded mail SPF failure into named owners, so our runbook carried the actual classification work.
User experience
Guidance vs control
DMARCeye is easier day to day. DMARC-SRG needs an operator.
DMARCeye got us to usable reporting faster because the product hid most ingestion mechanics and put sender status near the action. DMARC-SRG gave us control over hosting and storage, but the interface assumed we already knew how to explain the failures.
DMARCEye
Three domains added quickly
Unknown sender found fast
Forwarding reason partly clear
DMARC-SRG
Operator setup required
Domain filters stayed useful
Forwarding needed manual notes
In DMARCeye, adding the primary corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain was mostly a DNS and verification task. Finding the unknown sender took a short filter pass, and the forwarded mail SPF failure was visible as a pattern that needed explanation rather than as a clean spoof verdict.
In DMARC-SRG, the experience started with PHP, MariaDB or MySQL, mailbox ingestion, cron, and cleanup settings before the first report became useful. Once reports arrived, the domain and month filters worked, but explaining the unknown sender and the forwarded SPF failure required external IP checks and our own notes.
Support
Hands-on help vs self-managed support
DMARCeye has a clearer support path. DMARC-SRG makes support your responsibility.
DMARCeye's public materials gave us a clearer path for setup questions, DNS handoff, and paid escalation. DMARC-SRG had no commercial onboarding path in our review, so support meant project documentation and internal operations time.
DMARCEye
DNS handoff was documented
Priority support gated
Agency onboarding clearer
DMARC-SRG
Community support model
Escalation stayed internal
Runbook needed for DNS
For DMARCeye, the setup materials explained domain slots, annual billing, trial behavior, and where the DMARC reporting address belonged. The DNS handoff was workable for an SMB, but enterprise onboarding and multi-client architecture pointed us toward paid support and Agency discussions.
For DMARC-SRG, the support model matched open-source software. We could install and inspect the parser, but escalation for mailbox failures, database retention, DNS handoff, and enterprise onboarding had to sit with our own administrator or a community project issue.
Suitability
SMB fit vs operator fit
DMARCeye fits managed SMB reporting. DMARC-SRG fits technical operators.
DMARCeye is the better fit when the buyer wants a hosted product with reports, alerts, and a paid path for multi-client work. DMARC-SRG is the better fit when a technical team accepts self-hosting and manual handoff to keep software cost at $0. Buyers that need MSP workflows, client handoff notes, and alert quality built into the process should include Suped's product in that buying check.
DMARCEye
SMB reporting fit
Agency tier for clients
Recurring exports workable
DMARC-SRG
Self-hosted operator fit
Client separation manual
Reports need handoff notes
DMARCeye felt strongest for SMB and mid-market teams that need to watch a small domain set, review authentication drift, and produce recurring summaries without operating their own parser. Account separation was less mature on lower tiers, and true multi-tenant workflow belonged in Agency rather than the standard Scale path.
DMARC-SRG fit a technical team that wanted the code, database, and report retention under its own control. For an MSP or enterprise team, the missing account separation, recurring client reports, and formal handoff notes meant we had to build the operating model around the tool.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
DMARCEye
A managed reporting product for teams that want faster source decisions
After we connected Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender, DMARCeye grouped most approved traffic into recognizable services without us maintaining a separate spreadsheet. The marketing subdomain was the quickest to review because SendGrid and Mailchimp failures sat next to aligned DKIM and SPF outcomes.
The unknown sender needed one manual classification, but the surrounding report view gave us enough IP, domain, and authentication context to assign it to a forgotten support workflow. The forwarded mail SPF failure was visible as a failure pattern rather than a spoof, although the final explanation still needed an operator who understood forwarding.
Where it wins
Fast setup for three domains
Readable Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace views
Smart alerts caught the spoof sample
Blocklist (blacklist) monitoring included
Where it lags
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
DMARC policy changes stayed outside app
Multi-tenancy required Agency
Forwarding explanation needed human context
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
1 domain, 5,000 emails / month
Onboarding
Three domains in one afternoon
G2 rating
4.8 / 5
DMARC-SRG
A self-hosted parser for teams willing to own the workflow
DMARC-SRG felt practical once the server, database, mailbox ingestion, and cleanup settings were in place. It parsed the reports for the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain, then let us filter by domain, month, and reporting organization.
The tradeoff showed up every time a decision needed ownership. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were readable, but SendGrid, Mailchimp, the support desk sender, and the unknown sender needed manual naming, and the forwarded SPF failure became a note in our runbook rather than an in-app explanation.
Where it wins
$0 software license
Full self-hosted control
Useful domain and month filters
No subscription feature gates
Where it lags
Setup required PHP and database work
No proactive alerts
No managed support escalation
No hosted DNS workflows
Pricing
$0 software cost
Free tier
Free, self-hosted
Onboarding
Self-hosting before reports
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
DMARCEye
DMARC-SRG
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free plan fits this volume with 30 days of history.
$0 software cost
Self-hosting costs depend on your server, database, backups, and administrator time.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
From $8 / month
Estimate uses $4 per domain per month on annual Scale billing.
$0 software cost
No published app cap, but capacity depends on the deployment.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
From $40 / month
Estimate uses public Scale pricing and assumes the live volume limit fits the send volume.
$0 software cost
Database, PHP limits, storage, cleanup, and monitoring set the practical ceiling.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Custom
Scale covers up to 50 domains, while Agency handles larger or multi-tenant needs.
$0 software cost
No paid enterprise tier was listed, so support and operations stay internal.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
Numbers marked From for DMARCeye are estimates using public Scale list pricing at $4 per domain per month on annual billing. DMARCeye's Free and Scale prices and DMARC-SRG's $0 software cost are public list information; DMARCeye Agency, infrastructure, and support costs for DMARC-SRG are not public fixed prices. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Guided DNS fixes
DMARCeye showed authentication problems, but policy and DNS ownership still sat outside the workflow; Suped's product pairs each failing source with the record change and owner handoff.
Cleaner MSP handoff
DMARCeye's multi-tenancy sat behind Agency, and DMARC-SRG needed manual client separation; Suped's product keeps client grouping, recurring reports, and handoff notes in the same workflow.
Alerts with less manual triage
DMARCeye alerts were useful but plan dependent, while DMARC-SRG had no proactive alert layer; Suped's product flags spoofing, unknown senders, and record drift with routing built for operations.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from DMARCEye or DMARC-SRG?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
