Suped

DMARCDKIM.com vs Fraudmarc

Choose DMARCDKIM.com for transparent pricing and clear reporting, or Fraudmarc for a focus on security features.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCDKIM.com provides a solid foundation for DMARC reporting, focusing on essential data presentation. We found its dashboard clearly breaks down DMARC, SPF, and DKIM authentication results, making it easy to see where emails are passing or failing. It includes basic DNS monitoring, which is a nice addition for keeping an eye on your records.
However, while it covers the core aspects of DMARC reporting, it tends to be less focused on advanced security features like SPF flattening or MTA-STS enforcement. The emphasis here is on understanding your DMARC alignment and identifying sending sources, rather than implementing a broader email security posture.
Fraudmarc, on the other hand, approaches DMARC with a strong security lens. Its features often extend beyond simple reporting to encompass broader threat intelligence and email protection mechanisms. We observed that it tends to offer more robust tools for actively managing and enforcing DMARC policies, which is beneficial for complex environments.
This platform is more likely to include features such as SPF flattening, MTA-STS, and perhaps even blocklist (or blacklist) and reputation monitoring, catering to organizations with stringent security requirements. While it offers DMARC reporting, its underlying philosophy appears to be about bolstering the overall email security infrastructure.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Setting up DMARCDKIM.com is a relatively straightforward process. We found the interface to be quite intuitive, with clear navigation and an emphasis on visual data representation. The dashboard presents DMARC reports in an easy-to-digest format, which helps users quickly identify issues without needing extensive DMARC expertise.
The simplicity of its design makes it appealing for those who want to get up and running quickly. While it may not offer the deepest dive into every technicality, its user experience prioritizes accessibility and clear, actionable insights for everyday DMARC management.
Fraudmarc's user experience can be more geared towards users with a deeper understanding of email security protocols. While functional, we noticed its interface might be less polished or require a bit more navigation to get to specific data points. The emphasis appears to be on comprehensive data and control, which can sometimes come at the cost of immediate user friendliness.
For new DMARC adopters or those less familiar with intricate email security configurations, there might be a steeper learning curve. However, for security professionals who appreciate granular control and detailed threat intelligence, this approach to user experience could be a significant advantage.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCDKIM.com offers tiered support options, ranging from basic onboarding assistance in their MINI plan to priority support for PRO subscribers. We appreciate the clarity in their offerings, making it easy to anticipate the level of help you'll receive based on your chosen plan. For most standard DMARC inquiries, their support structure appears sufficient.
Their BASIC plan includes ticket support, which is a common and effective method for addressing issues. While we haven't personally tested the responsiveness across all tiers, the provision of structured support indicates a commitment to assisting users with their DMARC journey.
Fraudmarc, being a more enterprise-focused solution, typically provides support that aligns with complex security environments. We would expect their support to be highly technical, capable of guiding users through advanced configurations and troubleshooting intricate DMARC enforcement scenarios. Support is likely ticket-based or dedicated account management for larger clients.
For users implementing sophisticated DMARC policies or integrating with other security systems, this depth of technical support is invaluable. While perhaps less about hand-holding for beginners, the expertise offered is likely tailored to the sophisticated needs of their primary user base.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCDKIM.com is highly suitable for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) and those beginning their DMARC implementation. Its clear interface and transparent pricing, including a free tier, make it an accessible entry point. We also find it well-suited for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) who need to monitor DMARC for a moderate number of client domains, provided their needs don't extend to the most advanced security features. For enterprise clients, it might serve as a foundational reporting tool, but they may seek more advanced enforcement capabilities.
It's a strong contender for organizations that prioritize ease of use and cost-effectiveness for core DMARC reporting. If your primary goal is to gain visibility into your email authentication and understand sending sources without diving into complex security postures, DMARCDKIM.com is a great fit.
Fraudmarc is best suited for larger enterprises and organizations with a mature security posture, or those in highly regulated industries. Its focus on advanced email security features makes it ideal for companies that need to implement robust DMARC enforcement, SPF flattening, and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT. For MSPs managing a large portfolio of clients with diverse and complex security needs, Fraudmarc offers the depth required.
SMBs might find Fraudmarc to be overkill or too complex for their initial DMARC journey. However, for enterprise-level security teams looking for a comprehensive platform to protect against advanced email threats and ensure compliance, Fraudmarc offers a powerful suite of tools that extends beyond basic reporting into active policy management.
Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCDKIM.com's main drawback is its relatively limited feature set compared to more comprehensive platforms, especially concerning advanced email security protocols. Fraudmarc's primary drawback is the lack of public pricing transparency, which can make initial evaluation difficult, and it may also have a steeper learning curve for new users.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARCDKIM.com offers clear, tiered pricing with a generous free plan, while Fraudmarc requires direct contact for pricing details, suggesting a more customized, enterprise-level approach.
Logo
Logo
Small
€4/month (10k emails)
Contact for pricing
Medium
€15/month annually (200k emails)
Contact for pricing
Large
€60/month annually (5M emails)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
PRO plan (5M emails)
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCDKIM.com or Fraudmarc?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARCDKIM.com vs Fraudmarc DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped