What is the main difference between DMARCDKIM.com and Everest?

DMARCDKIM.com is a dedicated DMARC reporting and analytics tool, providing focused insights into email authentication. Everest, conversely, is a comprehensive email deliverability suite offering broader features like inbox placement, reputation monitoring, and email validation, with DMARC as one component among many. For a specialized DMARC solution, we recommend Suped's free DMARC plan.

Which product is better for small businesses?

DMARCDKIM.com is generally more suitable for small businesses or individuals due to its focused DMARC offering, simpler interface, and a free plan. Everest's extensive feature set and higher pricing tiers are more aligned with mid-market and enterprise needs, making it potentially overkill and too costly for smaller operations. Consider trying Suped for DMARC monitoring.

Does either product offer a free DMARC monitoring option?

Yes, DMARCDKIM.com offers a free plan for up to 5,000 emails per month and 1 domain, making it an accessible option for basic DMARC monitoring. Everest does not explicitly offer a free tier; its lowest paid tier starts at $20 per month for limited email volumes. Suped also offers an industry-leading free DMARC plan .

What kind of support can we expect from each platform?

DMARCDKIM.com provides tiered support, including onboarding, ticket, and priority support depending on your subscription level, generally focused on DMARC-specific issues. Everest offers Customer Success Managers for higher tiers, but user reviews suggest mixed experiences, with some setup challenges and a desire for more personalized assistance, especially with technical questions. Suped's DMARC reports platform also has comprehensive support.

Is Everest only for DMARC reporting, or does it offer other features?

Everest is a broad email success platform that extends far beyond just DMARC reporting. It includes robust features for inbox placement testing, IP and domain reputation monitoring (including blocklists), email validation, content design testing, and engagement analytics. Its DMARC features are integrated into this larger suite of tools designed for comprehensive email deliverability management.

How do the pricing models compare for high email volumes?

For high email volumes, DMARCDKIM.com offers a PRO plan at €80/month (or €60/month annually) for up to 5 million emails. Everest's pricing significantly scales up, with its "Elements Plus" tiers reaching $900/month for up to 100,000 emails, and requiring custom quotes for volumes exceeding 100,000 emails per month (Professional and Enterprise plans). This makes Everest considerably more expensive for large-scale sending. For cost-effective DMARC, we find Suped's DMARC features very competitive.

DMARCDKIM.com vs Everest

Choose DMARCDKIM.com for focused DMARC reporting, or Everest for a broader deliverability suite.

0 / 5(0)

Compare to Suped

4.2 / 5(189)

Compare to Suped

Compare product functionality

Feature set

DMARCDKIM.com specializes in comprehensive DMARC reporting and analytics, offering detailed insights into email authentication results. We find its interface dedicated to visualizing DMARC data, allowing for swift identification of compliance issues. The platform provides tools to understand sender sources, identify forwarding chains, and pinpoint spoofing attempts, which are crucial for maintaining email security and deliverability. Its focus means less clutter for those primarily concerned with DMARC implementation and enforcement.

We appreciate its capability for DNS monitoring, which helps ensure that DMARC, SPF, and DKIM records are correctly configured and remain valid. This helps prevent configuration errors that could lead to legitimate emails failing authentication. The reporting is geared towards clear, actionable intelligence, making it easier to move towards a p=quarantine or p=reject policy, ultimately enhancing domain protection. It's a straightforward tool for specific email authentication needs.

Everest offers a much broader suite of email deliverability tools beyond just DMARC, including inbox placement testing, reputation monitoring across various blocklists (blacklists), and email content testing. While it does provide DMARC reporting, it’s integrated into a larger ecosystem. We've found that it gives a holistic view of email health, encompassing pre-send checks, in-flight monitoring, and post-send analytics. Its strength lies in its comprehensive approach to ensure emails reach the inbox.

The platform's features extend to competitive intelligence, email validation, and engagement analytics, which are valuable for marketers and large-scale senders. The DMARC features are present, but not as deeply specialized as in a dedicated DMARC tool. Instead, they serve as one component of a larger deliverability puzzle. We noticed it provides detailed information on IP reputation and includes integrations with ESPs for more seamless data flow, offering a powerful, if sometimes overwhelming, array of functionalities.

How easy is each product to use

User experience

We found DMARCDKIM.com to have a very focused and intuitive user interface, particularly for DMARC beginners or those who prefer a less cluttered dashboard. The navigation is straightforward, directly leading to aggregate and forensic reports, authentication trends, and domain health. Its simplicity is a strength, reducing the learning curve. Setting up a new domain is a clear process, guided by the platform. The data visualization is clean and directly relevant to DMARC metrics, making it easy to spot non-compliant senders.

While the interface is functional, it doesn't offer extensive customization options seen in broader platforms. This can be a pro for users who prefer a "set it and forget it" approach to DMARC monitoring, or a con for those who desire more bespoke dashboards. We appreciate that it distills complex DMARC data into easily digestible formats, allowing users to quickly understand their DMARC compliance posture and take necessary actions without getting lost in extraneous features.

Everest presents a feature-rich, albeit sometimes complex, user experience. Its dashboards are highly customizable, allowing users to tailor views to their specific deliverability concerns. However, this wealth of options can lead to a steeper learning curve, especially for new users. We observed that navigating through its various modules, from inbox placement to reputation and DMARC, requires some familiarity with the platform's structure. The integrations with ESPs and other data sources enhance its utility but add layers of complexity to the initial setup and ongoing management.

Despite the complexity, the platform offers powerful insights once mastered. The visualization of data, while comprehensive, can sometimes feel dense. We found that the extensive features, such as seedlist testing and competitive intelligence, are invaluable for advanced users and larger organizations managing diverse email programs. Its UX is designed for power users who need granular control and deep analytics across a wide spectrum of email performance indicators.

Which product has the best support

Support

We observed DMARCDKIM.com offers tiered support, ranging from onboarding support for MINI plans to ticket support for BASIC, and priority support for PRO users. This structure suggests that as users scale up their plans, the responsiveness and depth of support improve. We found the documentation clear enough for basic setup, and for more complex DMARC issues, the ticket system appears to be the primary channel. The focus on DMARC means support staff are likely highly specialized in this area.

While direct phone support might not be universally available across all tiers, the provision of onboarding support indicates a commitment to helping users get started correctly. For smaller teams or individuals, the self-service resources paired with ticket-based assistance should be sufficient. We haven't encountered any major roadblocks that couldn't be addressed through their stated support channels.

Everest offers a more structured support model, including access to Customer Success Managers (CSM) for higher tiers, as noted in user reviews. This is crucial for navigating its extensive features and optimizing complex email programs. Reviews indicate that while CSMs are generally helpful, technical questions might take longer to resolve, and initial setup can be challenging. The transition from previous platforms (like Return Path) has sometimes led to support-related issues.

The platform is geared towards enterprise and larger organizations that often require dedicated support. We've noted a mixed bag of feedback, with some users praising responsive account managers, while others mention historical issues with customer support after acquisitions. The availability of resources like office hours for support suggests a community-based approach to problem-solving, though some users express a desire for more personalized, hands-on onboarding and daily assistance.

Who should use each product

Suitability

DMARCDKIM.com is best suited for small to medium businesses (SMBs) and individual users who primarily need a dedicated, straightforward DMARC monitoring and reporting solution. Its clear pricing tiers, including a generous free plan for one domain, make it accessible for those just starting their DMARC journey. For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), its multi-domain capabilities in higher tiers could be useful, allowing them to manage DMARC for several clients, but it lacks broader deliverability features they might need.

For enterprise-level organizations, DMARCDKIM.com might serve as a component of their email security stack, specifically for DMARC. However, it may not offer the expansive suite of deliverability, reputation, and marketing-focused features that large enterprises typically require from a single platform. It excels as a specialized DMARC tool rather than a comprehensive email deliverability platform, offering essential DMARC insights without overwhelming complexity.

Everest is a powerful platform ideal for mid-market and enterprise-level organizations, as well as MSPs, that require a comprehensive email deliverability and marketing intelligence suite. Its wide array of features, from inbox placement and reputation monitoring to competitive intelligence and email validation, caters to sophisticated email programs and teams. MSPs would find its extensive capabilities useful for managing multiple clients' diverse email needs, offering a centralized hub for all deliverability aspects.

While it has a basic tier, its pricing and feature set lean heavily towards larger senders with significant email volumes and complex requirements. SMBs might find it overly robust and expensive if their needs are solely DMARC reporting. Its strength lies in providing a 360-degree view of email performance, making it suitable for organizations where email deliverability directly impacts revenue and reputation across multiple campaigns and sending entities. It is not designed for basic DMARC monitoring, but for advanced email strategy.

How does DMARCDKIM.com compare with Everest?

DMARC report analysis

Analysis of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports

Source detection

Identifies email sending sources

Forward detection

Detects email forwarding chains

Spoof detection

Identifies email spoofing attempts

Notifications and alerts

Proactive alerts for DMARC issues

For BASIC and PRO plans

User reviews mention alerts

Reporting

Detailed analytics and reporting

API

Programmatic access for integration

For Professional and Enterprise tiers

Multi-tenancy

Manages multiple domains/clients

Unlimited seats, multiple domains

Unlimited users for Enterprise

SPF flattening

Addresses the 10-lookup limit for SPF

Common for DMARC focus

Not a primary focus

Hosted DMARC

Assistance with DMARC record hosting

Guidance and setup assistance

BIMI

BIMI record support

Integration for DMARC-related branding

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Advanced security protocols

Advanced DMARC-focused security

Blocklists and reputation

Monitors IP/domain blocklists

Focuses on DMARC authentication

Explicit reputation monitoring

AI copilot

AI-powered assistance

DNS monitoring

Monitors DNS record health

For MINI, BASIC, PRO plans

Implied by reputation monitoring

Self hostable

Ability to host on private infrastructure

Free trial/free tier

Offers a free way to test or use

Includes a free plan

Trial available for paid plans

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCDKIM.com, while focused, lacks advanced deliverability features that comprehensive platforms offer and has no public reviews to gauge user sentiment. Everest, despite its robust feature set, can be complex to set up, has mixed support feedback, and some users reported issues with seedlist accuracy and contract terms.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

0 / 5(0)

4.2 / 5(189)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Shady sales practice shoot down ok software - don't use these guys

0.5 / 5

What do you like best about Everest? The software is decent and the validation program works for Microsoft (Hotmail etc) based email, but not for Gmail What do you dislike about Everest? Terrible sales practice. Call you within 45 days of renewal, when you ask to change you are told you can't as there is a hidden lock-in in the T+Cs, you need to give 60 days' notice. Legal but shady, we renewed and then immediately gave notice for next year. They used to be good not so now. Recommendations to others considering Everest: Find another supplier, these guys are sharks What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you? Helped delivery to MS-based email

Verified User in Marketing and Advertising

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Good for Beginners in Deliverability...Could be Better for Pros

2.0 / 5

What do you like best about Everest? Setting up Dashboards to monitor all deliverability metrics What do you dislike about Everest? Support is okay, but it could be lot better Navigational aids are not comparable to other industry-rated tools. Recommendations to others considering Everest: New to the deliverability landscape, this tool is perfect for you, but if you are an industry pro and understand the ins and outs of deliverability I would look elsewhere. What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you? Improving inbox placement Lowering spam complaints

Bryan P.

Email, SMS Marketing Director Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Review after using more than 2 months

2.5 / 5

What do you like best about Everest? Able to help in domain and IP blacklisted daily checking. Quick display the domain reputation status. After using Inbox placement service and domains/IP pools, feel their interface is nice and clear. What do you dislike about Everest? Does not provide the IP or domain score with ISP like Hotmail and Yahoo. Inbox percentage in accurate due to need send to all seed's ISP just able to get the score. Inbox percentage for Hotmail does not accurate. Does not provide whitelisting service for IPs. It is just a simple domain blacklisting status system. What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you? None of the problem have been solving through this Everest. It just a inbox placement display system only. Easily noticed on domain blacklisted only. Other than this are nothing.

Verified User in Marketing and Advertising

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

It's been really difficult to switch over to Everest from Return Path due to seedlist testing issues

2.5 / 5

What do you like best about Everest? I like the accessibility to create dashboards and share across the org. What do you dislike about Everest? The only downside was that it was extremely difficult to switch over to everest from return path due to seedlisting issues mainly from our ESP, Braze What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you? Mainly using everest for deliverability measurement. havent had the chance to use it for more since we've been spending a lot of time switching platforms.

Verified User in Food & Beverages

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

So far not so good

3.0 / 5

What do you like best about Everest? We've been working on setting up since mid-August, but due to issues on the platform side, have been unable to fully set up. That said, our account manager has been responsive and diligently working on getting the issues resolved, so I would say that the user support is the best part. What do you dislike about Everest? We're on our third month trying to get set up due to platform issues, which I think is not great considering the price. Return Path set up went much smoother, and we were able to get started right away without a hitch. Recommendations to others considering Everest: Prepare for a longer-than-estimated setup process. What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you? Monitoring email deliverability is of utmost importance to our business. Being able to see when things take a turn for the worse and being able to react quickly helps us keep our email reputation positive and keeps our emails in user's inboxes!

Verified User in Health, Wellness and Fitness

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Pricing

DMARCDKIM.com offers clear, lower-cost tiers starting with a free plan, while Everest has significantly higher pricing, with custom quotes for larger volumes and no free tier.

Small

Up to 10k emails / month

€0/month (5k), €4/month (10k)

$20/month (5k), $40/month (10k)

Medium

Up to 100k emails / month

€20/month (200k)

$80 (20k), $215 (50k), $525 (60k), $900 (100k)

Large

Up to 1 million emails / month

€80/month (5M)

Contact for pricing