Suped

DMARCDKIM.com vs ELK DMARC

Choose DMARCDKIM.com for a managed solution, or ELK DMARC for a self-hosted, open-source approach.
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCDKIM.com provides a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting features, offering aggregate and forensic reports that help us analyze email authentication results. We found its dashboard intuitive for identifying DMARC compliance issues, unauthorized sending sources, and potential spoofing attempts.
Beyond core DMARC analytics, it includes DNS monitoring and actionable alerts. The platform aims to simplify the often complex task of DMARC implementation and enforcement, making it accessible even for users new to email security protocols.
ELK DMARC, being an open-source, self-hosted solution, offers immense flexibility in its feature set. At its core, it parses DMARC aggregate reports and stores them in an Elasticsearch (ELK Stack) database, allowing for powerful querying and visualization using Kibana.
While it requires manual setup and configuration for all its components, the potential for customization is vast. Users can build their own dashboards, create specific alerts using ElastAlert, and integrate it with other systems, limited only by their technical expertise and imagination.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our hands-on experience, DMARCDKIM.com offers a streamlined and managed user experience. The setup process is guided, and once DMARC records are correctly configured, reports flow in automatically. The dashboard presents data clearly, with easy-to-read graphs and tables.
Its strength lies in abstracting away much of the underlying complexity of DMARC, allowing us to focus on interpreting the data and taking necessary actions rather than managing infrastructure. It's a plug-and-play solution designed for quick insights.
ELK DMARC, by its very nature, demands a higher level of technical proficiency for its user experience. We found that deploying it involves setting up a full ELK stack, configuring Docker, and managing server resources (at least 8GB memory for Elasticsearch).
Once deployed, the user experience is primarily through Kibana. This means flexibility but also a steeper learning curve for crafting dashboards and queries. It's an excellent choice for those who are comfortable with server administration and data visualization tools, offering total control over the data presentation and analysis.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCDKIM.com provides structured support based on its pricing plans, ranging from onboarding assistance in the MINI plan to priority support in the PRO plan. We observed that ticket-based support is available for BASIC and PRO users, offering a reliable channel for assistance with platform issues or DMARC record configuration.
This level of support is typical for SaaS (Software as a Service) platforms, providing direct access to the vendor's expertise. For users who prefer direct assistance and guidance, this managed support model is a significant advantage, ensuring a smoother DMARC journey.
As an open-source project, ELK DMARC's support model is fundamentally different. We found that primary support comes from the community and documentation available on its GitHub repository. This means troubleshooting often involves searching existing issues, submitting new ones, or relying on community forums for help.
While there isn't a dedicated support team in the traditional commercial sense, the open-source nature means that solutions and improvements can sometimes come directly from other users or contributors. This model suits those who are self-sufficient and comfortable navigating technical documentation and community-driven assistance.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCDKIM.com is best suited for organizations that prefer a fully managed DMARC reporting service without the overhead of maintaining their own infrastructure. It's a strong fit for SMBs (small to medium businesses) looking for an easy entry into DMARC, and also for larger enterprises that need reliable reporting and support.
For MSPs (managed service providers), it offers a straightforward way to offer DMARC monitoring to their clients, allowing them to scale without significant technical investment in setting up and maintaining the reporting solution itself. Its tiered plans accommodate varying email volumes and domain needs.
ELK DMARC is ideal for technically proficient organizations, particularly those with existing ELK Stack deployments or a strong DevOps culture. It suits enterprises with complex data privacy or self-hosting requirements that want full control over their DMARC data pipeline.
MSPs with the internal expertise to deploy and manage open-source solutions can leverage ELK DMARC to build a highly customized DMARC reporting offering for their clients. However, it is generally less suitable for SMBs or organizations without dedicated IT resources, as the setup and ongoing maintenance are substantial.
Logo
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCDKIM.com primarily relies on a managed service model, which means less control over raw data access and potential limitations on custom reporting outside of the platform's predefined options. Its pricing model might also become a significant factor for very high-volume senders. ELK DMARC's main drawback is its inherent complexity, demanding considerable technical skill and resources for initial setup and ongoing maintenance, making it unsuitable for teams without dedicated IT or DevOps support. This also means no dedicated commercial support channel.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
ELK DMARC

Pricing

DMARCDKIM.com offers a clear tiered pricing structure, whereas ELK DMARC is open-source and free, but incurs costs for self-hosting resources.
Logo
ELK DMARC
Small
€4/month (MINI)
Self-hosted, resource costs apply
Medium
€15-€20/month (BASIC)
Self-hosted, resource costs apply
Large
€60-€80/month (PRO)
Self-hosted, resource costs apply
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, resource costs apply

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCDKIM.com or ELK DMARC?
Logo
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARCDKIM.com vs ELK DMARC DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped