Suped

DMARCDKIM.com vs DMARC 25

Choose DMARCDKIM.com if you prioritize budget and self-service, choose DMARC 25 if you prefer direct support and custom pricing.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCDKIM.com provides a solid foundation for DMARC monitoring, offering both aggregate and forensic reports starting from its BASIC plan. This dual reporting capability is crucial for understanding email authentication trends and diagnosing issues, allowing us to see both the broad picture and the granular details of email delivery.
Beyond core DMARC analysis, DMARCDKIM.com also includes DNS monitoring as a standard feature across its paid plans. This is a neat bonus, helping us keep an eye on our broader DNS health, not just DMARC related records. However, advanced features such as BIMI, MTA-STS, or SPF flattening are not explicitly highlighted in their offerings.
DMARC 25 focuses on delivering essential DMARC report monitoring. While specific feature details are less transparent without direct inquiry, we can infer that it provides the fundamental tools necessary to analyze DMARC data and gain insights into email authentication results, which is the core purpose of such a service.
Given their 'contact for pricing' model and emphasis on direct engagement, we suspect DMARC 25 might offer a more tailored feature set to larger organizations or those with specific compliance needs. However, the lack of publicly available specifics on advanced features makes it hard to compare their depth of functionality directly against more transparent competitors.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our experience, DMARCDKIM.com offers a relatively straightforward and intuitive user interface. The setup process for adding domains and configuring DMARC records is guided, making it accessible even for those new to DMARC. The dashboards present data clearly, focusing on deliverability trends and authentication results, which we appreciate for quick insights.
The platform aims for a self-service model, allowing users to navigate and manage their DMARC policies independently. While functional, it might not offer the deepest customization options or a highly polished aesthetic compared to some market leaders, but it certainly gets the job done efficiently and without unnecessary complexity.
DMARC 25's user experience appears to be geared towards a more managed approach, especially given their emphasis on direct contact for inquiries. This suggests a less immediate, self-onboarding experience and potentially a more consultative setup process, which can be beneficial for complex enterprise environments.
Without direct access to their dashboard, it's challenging to give a definitive assessment, but the 'contact us' model often implies a more hands-on client relationship rather than a DIY platform. This could mean a personalized setup and reporting tailored to specific client needs, but also potentially a longer time to get fully operational.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCDKIM.com offers a tiered support structure that scales with its pricing plans. The MINI plan includes onboarding support, which is helpful for initial setup. Moving up, the BASIC plan provides ticket support, ensuring that users can get assistance with issues in a structured manner.
For their PRO plan customers, priority support is available, indicating faster response times and dedicated assistance. This layered approach means that the level of support we receive is directly related to our investment, which is a common and practical model in the SaaS industry.
DMARC 25 emphasizes direct contact for support, offering both phone and web inquiry options during business hours. This approach suggests a more personal touch, where we can speak directly with a representative to address our needs or concerns. This can be a significant advantage for users who prefer direct communication over ticket systems.
The lack of specified tiered support indicates that all users, regardless of plan size, might receive a similar level of direct attention. While this is great for personalized service, it might also mean that response times are consistent across the board rather than offering priority options, though this is speculative without direct experience.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCDKIM.com is highly suitable for SMBs, especially with its free plan and affordable MINI and BASIC tiers. These plans offer good value for managing a few domains and moderate email volumes, making it a strong contender for small to medium-sized businesses looking for straightforward DMARC monitoring. For enterprise clients, the PRO plan provides significant email volume and domain capacity, but dedicated enterprise features for advanced security postures are not prominently advertised.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), DMARCDKIM.com could work for managing individual client domains, especially with its 'unlimited seats' feature. However, it does not explicitly offer multi-tenancy capabilities or advanced reporting dashboards tailored for managing numerous clients from a single interface, which might be a consideration for MSPs with a large client base.
DMARC 25, with its 'contact for pricing' model and direct support approach, appears to be best suited for enterprise-level organizations or businesses with complex, specific DMARC requirements that necessitate a tailored solution. The emphasis on direct engagement suggests they cater to clients who prefer a consultative sales and implementation process.
For MSPs, DMARC 25 could be a viable option if they are looking for a highly customized solution for their clients and are prepared for a sales-driven engagement. However, SMBs might find the lack of transparent pricing and a self-service entry point less appealing, making it a less immediate fit for smaller operations.
Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When assessing DMARCDKIM.com, we note its limited data retention on lower plans and the absence of advanced email security features like BIMI or MTA-STS. For DMARC 25, the primary drawback is the opaque pricing and the lack of publicly detailed features, which requires direct engagement to understand its full capabilities and costs. Both products also currently lack a significant public review presence.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARCDKIM.com offers clear, tiered pricing starting with a generous free plan, while DMARC 25 requires direct contact for all pricing inquiries.
Logo
Logo
Small
€4/month (MINI, 10k emails)
Contact for pricing
Medium
€15-€20/month (BASIC, 200k emails)
Contact for pricing
Large
€60-€80/month (PRO, 5M emails)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
€60-€80/month (PRO, 5M emails)
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCDKIM.com or DMARC 25?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions