Suped

DMARCAnalyzer vs Fraudmarc Community Edition

Choose DMARCAnalyzer for a comprehensive, managed DMARC service, or Fraudmarc Community Edition for a free, self-managed open-source solution.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCAnalyzer, now part of Mimecast, offers a robust suite of DMARC reporting and analysis features designed for ease of use. It provides clear visibility into email channels, making it simpler to identify and mitigate spoofing attempts. We found its dashboard intuitive for monitoring DMARC compliance and authentication results.
The platform excels in detailed reporting, helping users understand why emails pass or fail DMARC, SPF, and DKIM. It includes features like forensic reports, aggregate data visualization, and the ability to export data for further analysis. We appreciate its comprehensive approach to email authentication, making it suitable for organizations that require a managed and analytical solution.
Fraudmarc Community Edition (CE) provides the raw power of DMARC reporting in an open-source, self-managed package. It's built for those who prefer to have full control over their data and infrastructure, offering a transparent view into the DMARC reporting process. We found that deploying and configuring it requires a significant level of technical expertise.
While it delivers essential DMARC reports, the interpretation and actionability of the data largely depend on the user's skill set. Fraudmarc CE offers core DMARC aggregation and parsing, but advanced features like guided remediation or detailed threat intelligence are not integrated. It's a foundational tool, best for users comfortable with a hands-on approach and community-based support.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCAnalyzer offers a polished and guided user experience, prioritizing simplicity and clarity. Its dashboards are designed to be easily digestible, even for those new to DMARC. We found the navigation straightforward, with clear pathways to aggregate reports, forensic data, and configuration settings.
The interface provides actionable insights, often suggesting steps for DMARC policy enforcement. Automation features and visual aids contribute to a smooth workflow, reducing the manual effort required for DMARC management. This makes it an approachable option for teams that prefer a 'set it and forget it' (mostly) solution with minimal friction.
Fraudmarc Community Edition's user experience is inherently different, as it is a self-hosted, open-source solution. There isn't a traditional 'interface' in the same way a SaaS product offers. Users interact with it through command-line tools, configuration files, and possibly custom dashboards built on top of the raw data.
This requires a strong technical background and comfort with server management and data analysis. While it offers immense flexibility, the initial setup and ongoing maintenance contribute to a steeper learning curve. Its UX is less about intuitive clicks and more about powerful control for those who know how to wield it.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As a commercial product, DMARCAnalyzer provides structured customer support. Users can expect access to a dedicated support team through various channels, likely including email, phone, and a ticketing system. We anticipate comprehensive assistance for setup, configuration, and troubleshooting, aligning with Mimecast's broader service offerings.
The level of support typically scales with the chosen plan, offering professional guidance crucial for businesses of all sizes. This managed approach ensures that even complex DMARC issues can be resolved with expert assistance, providing peace of mind and reducing the internal burden on IT teams.
Support for Fraudmarc Community Edition is, as the name suggests, community-driven. This means assistance is primarily available through their community forum. Users rely on shared knowledge, peer advice, and self-help resources like documentation and GitHub discussions.
While the community can be a valuable resource for specific technical questions, it does not offer the immediate, guaranteed response times or dedicated troubleshooting that a commercial support plan provides. Users must be self-reliant and comfortable seeking solutions within a public forum, which might not suit time-sensitive or critical issues.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCAnalyzer is best suited for organizations that prefer a comprehensive, managed DMARC solution with a user-friendly interface. It's ideal for:
SMBs: Provides an accessible entry point to DMARC enforcement without requiring deep in-house expertise. Enterprise: Offers scalable reporting and robust features for large, complex email infrastructures. MSPs: Can be integrated into service offerings for clients needing managed DMARC, though direct multi-tenancy features might need clarification.
We've found it to be a strong choice for businesses aiming to quickly achieve DMARC compliance and enhance email security with minimal operational overhead.
Fraudmarc Community Edition is perfect for technically proficient users and organizations with specific needs for control and customization. It is most suitable for:
SMBs: Only for those with strong in-house technical resources willing to self-manage. Enterprise: Less suitable due to the lack of commercial support and managed features, unless integrated into a custom security stack. MSPs: Can be leveraged by MSPs with advanced development capabilities to build custom solutions for clients, but requires significant integration effort.
We would recommend it for individuals or small teams with the expertise and resources to deploy, maintain, and troubleshoot an open-source DMARC reporting system.

How does DMARCAnalyzer compare with Fraudmarc Community Edition?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCAnalyzer, while robust, can become costly for larger organizations, and its comprehensive features might be an overkill for those with simple needs. Fraudmarc Community Edition, conversely, demands significant technical prowess and a willingness to self-manage, lacking the creature comforts of a commercial platform like dedicated support or a polished UI.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARCAnalyzer operates on a quote-based model for its full services, while Fraudmarc Community Edition is a free, open-source solution requiring self-management.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free
Large
Contact for pricing
Free
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCAnalyzer or Fraudmarc Community Edition?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions