Suped

DMARCAnalyzer vs ELK DMARC

Choose DMARCAnalyzer for a managed service, or ELK DMARC for a self-hosted, open-source solution.
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCAnalyzer, now part of Mimecast, offers a comprehensive DMARC reporting and analysis platform. It provides detailed insights into email authentication results, aggregating DMARC, SPF, and DKIM data into user-friendly dashboards.
We found its strength lies in its ability to present complex email flows in an accessible format, making it easier for users to identify unauthorized senders and enforce DMARC policies. It's a polished commercial offering, reflecting its enterprise-grade heritage.
ELK DMARC is an open-source, self-hosted solution built on the Elastic Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana). It provides the raw tools for DMARC reporting, allowing for deep customization and control over your data.
While powerful, its feature set is inherently tied to the ELK stack capabilities, meaning a significant portion of its 'features' are what you build or configure yourself. It's a blank canvas for those with the technical chops, offering immense flexibility, but requiring more setup and ongoing management than a SaaS product.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCAnalyzer's user interface is professional and well-structured. We found navigation intuitive, with clear menus and dashboards that guide users through their DMARC journey from monitoring to enforcement.
The dashboards are visually appealing, translating complex DMARC data into digestible charts and graphs. Setting up domains and policies is streamlined, which helps new users quickly get started without feeling overwhelmed.
ELK DMARC's user experience is largely dependent on one's familiarity with Kibana. If you are comfortable with the Elastic Stack, you will find its dashboards and data exploration tools powerful.
However, for those without prior ELK experience, there is a steeper learning curve. The interface is highly configurable, which means it can be as simple or as complex as you make it, but it requires manual effort to optimize the UX to your specific needs. It's less of an out-of-the-box solution and more of a framework.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As a Mimecast product, DMARCAnalyzer benefits from a well-established support infrastructure. We anticipate access to various support channels, including documentation, email support, and potentially phone support for higher-tier plans.
Their resources are generally comprehensive, designed to assist users with both the technical aspects of DMARC and the platform's functionality. This is typical of commercial SaaS offerings, providing a safety net for users.
ELK DMARC, being an open-source project, relies primarily on community support. Users will find help through GitHub issues, forums, and potentially other community-driven channels.
There isn't a dedicated support team in the traditional commercial sense. While this fosters a collaborative environment, it also means solutions might take longer to find, and direct, personalized assistance is not guaranteed. It requires a DIY approach to troubleshooting.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCAnalyzer is highly suitable for organizations of all sizes looking for a managed, user-friendly DMARC reporting solution. Its intuitive interface and comprehensive features make it a strong choice for SMBs that need guidance and enterprises requiring robust reporting and enforcement capabilities.
For MSPs (managed service providers), it offers a streamlined approach to managing DMARC for multiple clients, although specific multi-tenancy features would require direct inquiry. It's a 'set it and forget it' type of tool, minimizing operational overhead.
ELK DMARC is best suited for technically proficient users, IT departments with ELK stack experience, or organizations with strict data residency requirements that prefer self-hosting. It's ideal for enterprise environments with dedicated DevOps teams who can manage and customize the stack.
SMBs might find the setup and maintenance overhead too demanding, while MSPs could leverage its open-source nature for highly customized, cost-effective solutions for clients, provided they have the internal expertise to deploy and support it. It requires significant technical investment but offers unparalleled control.

How does DMARCAnalyzer compare with ELK DMARC?

Logo
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCAnalyzer is a feature-rich, managed service, but its cost can be a barrier for smaller organizations, and it might lack the granular control some highly technical teams desire. ELK DMARC, on the other hand, offers ultimate control and cost-effectiveness for those with the technical expertise, but it demands significant investment in setup and ongoing maintenance. If you're not an Elastic Stack wizard, preparing for a bit of a headache might be wise.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
ELK DMARC

Pricing

DMARCAnalyzer uses a quote-based model, likely scaling with email volume and features, whereas ELK DMARC is free open-source software with costs only tied to your infrastructure.
Logo
ELK DMARC
Small
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, resource costs apply
Medium
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, resource costs apply
Large
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, resource costs apply
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, resource costs apply

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCAnalyzer or ELK DMARC?
Logo
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions