Suped

DMARC360 vs ELK DMARC

Choose DMARC360 for a comprehensive managed platform, or ELK DMARC for a self-hosted, open-source solution.
LogoCompare to Suped
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC360 (part of CTM360) offers a robust, all-in-one platform for digital risk protection, with DMARC reporting being a significant component. We found it provides extensive visibility into email authentication, helping identify spoofing attempts and misconfigurations. Its focus extends beyond DMARC to encompass broader external attack surface management, anti-phishing, and brand protection, which can be beneficial for a holistic security approach.
The platform includes detailed DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, parsed and presented in an understandable format. It also integrates features like source detection, forward detection, and spoof detection, giving a clear picture of email traffic. While comprehensive, we sometimes noticed that the sheer breadth of features could lead to a steeper learning curve, especially for those primarily focused on DMARC.
ELK DMARC is an open-source, self-hosted solution built on the Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana (ELK) stack. As such, its feature set is fundamentally different from a commercial managed service. It provides the core functionality for DMARC reporting, allowing you to ingest DMARC aggregate reports, store them, and visualize the data in Kibana dashboards. We appreciate the flexibility and control this offers, as you're entirely responsible for its deployment and configuration.
The key benefit here is the ability to customize every aspect of the reporting and data retention. However, this also means that advanced features like automated SPF flattening, integrated blocklist monitoring, or AI-driven insights are not out-of-the-box functionalities. You'd need to develop or integrate these yourself, which requires significant technical expertise in the ELK stack and email security protocols. It’s a powerful engine, but you need to build the car around it.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our experience, DMARC360 generally offers a user-friendly interface designed for a broad audience, from security analysts to IT managers. The dashboards are visually rich, providing quick insights into DMARC compliance and threat landscapes. Navigation is intuitive, and data is presented in a way that allows for easy drill-down into specific issues.
However, with its extensive feature set, we sometimes found that the learning curve for mastering all modules, particularly email security metrics, could be a bit steep for new users. While powerful, the filtering features could occasionally be confusing, requiring some time to get accustomed to the platform's specific logic. More tailored onboarding, as some users suggest, could further enhance the initial user experience.
ELK DMARC's user experience is inherently tied to the ELK stack, which means it caters to a more technical audience. While the Kibana dashboards can be highly customized to present DMARC data beautifully, setting this up requires expertise in Elasticsearch queries, Logstash configurations, and Kibana visualizations. This isn't a plug-and-play solution, but rather a framework for building your own.
We've seen that once configured, the dashboards provide deep, granular control over DMARC data analysis. The initial setup and ongoing maintenance, however, demand a strong understanding of command-line interfaces, Docker, and Linux environments. If you enjoy getting under the hood and crafting your own monitoring solution, ELK DMARC offers unparalleled customization. If you prefer a managed service, prepare for a steep ascent.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Based on our observations and user feedback, DMARC360 provides a strong, responsive support model. As a commercial platform, it offers dedicated customer service, technical assistance, and often a managed service component for complex issues. Users frequently praise the team's professionalism, responsiveness, and willingness to assist with various security concerns, not just DMARC.
We've found their support team to be knowledgeable and helpful, especially when navigating the platform's broader digital risk protection features. This kind of hands-on support is invaluable for organizations that prefer a partner-led approach to cybersecurity, ensuring that issues are resolved efficiently and that teams are guided through the platform's capabilities.
ELK DMARC, being an open-source project, relies primarily on community support. This means that direct, dedicated support channels typically found with commercial products are absent. Users needing assistance would turn to GitHub issues, forums, or other community resources. This can be a double-edged sword: you benefit from the collective knowledge of the open-source community, but response times and the depth of assistance can vary greatly.
While we appreciate the collaborative nature of open-source projects, organizations considering ELK DMARC must account for their internal technical resources. Effectively, your support team *is* your internal IT and security team, coupled with any open-source community contributions. If you're encountering a complex issue specific to your deployment, you might find yourself doing a lot of the troubleshooting work.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC360 is highly suitable for a range of organizations, particularly those looking for a comprehensive, managed digital risk protection platform that includes DMARC. We see it as an excellent fit for mid-market to enterprise companies that need robust security features, proactive monitoring, and a responsive support team without the burden of managing the infrastructure themselves. MSPs (managed service providers) could also leverage DMARC360 for their clients, benefiting from its all-in-one approach.
For SMBs, the offering may be more feature-rich than strictly necessary, but their Community Edition provides an entry point. Its strengths lie in providing actionable insights and brand protection alongside DMARC, making it ideal for organizations where email security is part of a broader external threat management strategy.
ELK DMARC is best suited for organizations with significant internal technical expertise in DevOps, Linux administration, and the ELK stack. It's a prime choice for those who prefer complete control over their data, infrastructure, and customization. This might include technically advanced SMBs, security teams within larger enterprises who want to integrate DMARC data into their existing ELK deployments, or even individual developers.
For MSPs, adopting ELK DMARC would require significant investment in developing a managed offering around it, as it's not multi-tenant out-of-the-box. Enterprises that lack dedicated resources for self-hosting and maintaining complex open-source solutions might find it too demanding. It's truly for the do-it-yourselfers who aren't afraid of a command line or a hefty memory allocation.

How does DMARC360 compare with ELK DMARC?

Logo
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When assessing both platforms, we note that DMARC360, while comprehensive, sometimes struggles with UI fluidity and integration capabilities as reported by users, and its extensive features can lead to a learning curve. ELK DMARC's primary drawback is the significant technical expertise required for setup, maintenance, and the absence of out-of-the-box advanced features or dedicated support, making it less accessible for teams without strong in-house DevOps skills.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
ELK DMARC
delivers a seamless, proactive brand protection experience
What do you like best about CTM360? CTM360 consolidates external attack surface management, brand protection, anti‑phishing, and takedowns into a single, unified platform. It cuts through the noise with pre‑populated threat data specific to our brand—no extra setup required—and consistently delivers highly actionable alerts What do you dislike about CTM360? While takedowns are fast and effective, expanding reach across more platforms and registrars would enhance the impact What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? Data leakage, Breaches, Brand imposters or VIP
Verified User in Airlines/Aviation
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
It's Good
What do you like best about CTM360? The detection works. Really good information given on breached credentials and fake apps that a takedown was so easy. What do you dislike about CTM360? The interface is not user friendly. Sometimes it takes more than a couple of clicks to get the information needed. What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? It allows us to view breached credentials and also fake website & apps.
Zulfa J.
CTO Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
CTM360 give whole experience as a user. The detection for cases is okay overall
What do you like best about CTM360? The support of the CTM360 team is totally responsive and helpful. The platform also user friendly and easy to use What do you dislike about CTM360? Sometimes we got confuse with the filtering features. However, the support team has guide us accordingly What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? Detection for EASM cases - features of deep scanning brand monitoring. By connecting with the CIRT team globally. CTM360 Sometimes able to take down cases faster than other platform
Verified User in Financial Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Recommmended
What do you like best about CTM360? quick Threat intelligence and insights about the related issues and leaks What do you dislike about CTM360? Sometime shows repeated or resolved issues and vulnerabilities What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? TI feeds, Data leaks etc
Hafiz T.
Unit Head Cyber Security Operations Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
A Proactive Platform for External Threat Monitoring and Email Security
What do you like best about CTM360? CTM360's HackerView platform provides unmatched visibility into our exposed digital assets and misconfigured email settings. Its clear remediation guidance and intuitive UI help our team quickly prioritize and resolve security risks. The support team’s engagement and resource library are also major strengths. What do you dislike about CTM360? While CTM360 offers comprehensive features, the learning curve for understanding all modules—especially email security metrics—can be steep for first-time users. Some reports could benefit from more contextual detail or severity scoring to help teams triage more efficiently. More tailored onboarding would be helpful. What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? CTM360 helps us identify and resolve external cyber risks like exposed assets, DMARC misconfigurations, and domain spoofing. By proactively detecting vulnerabilities and offering clear remediation steps, it enhances our cyber resilience, improves email security, and reduces the risk of exploitation—all from a single, easy-to-use platform.
Ebrima S.
Computer Security Analyst Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

Pricing

DMARC360 offers a Community Edition for free, with detailed pricing for paid tiers requiring direct contact, whereas ELK DMARC is open-source and free to use, but incurs costs for self-hosting infrastructure.
Logo
ELK DMARC
Small
Contact for pricing (Community Edition available)
Free (self-hosted, requires hardware/cloud costs)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted, requires hardware/cloud costs)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted, requires hardware/cloud costs)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted, requires hardware/cloud costs)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC360 or ELK DMARC?
Logo
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions