This tool offers a solid, if somewhat traditional, approach to DMARC reporting. It parses aggregate (RUA) reports and presents them in a series of web pages, providing a clear overview of DMARC compliance, authentication results, and traffic sources.

We find its data presentation to be functional and straightforward, focusing on the raw DMARC data without much embellishment. While it effectively displays DMARC records and authentication results, it prioritizes a bare-bones, data-centric view over elaborate visualizations.

Techsneeze provides a more visually appealing interface for DMARC report viewing. It also processes RUA reports, but offers a dashboard-like experience with graphs and charts that make it easier to digest the information at a glance.

We appreciate its effort to modernize the self-hosted DMARC reporting experience. The tool aims to simplify the interpretation of complex DMARC data, making it more accessible for users who prefer graphical summaries and interactive elements.

Deploying DMARC-SRG requires a bit of manual effort, involving cloning a repository and configuring a PHP environment. Users comfortable with command-line operations and web server setup will find it manageable.

Once set up, navigating the reports is intuitive, though the interface is purely functional, reminding us of web applications from an earlier era. For those comfortable with a simpler, text-heavy display, it serves its purpose well, but it won't win any design awards.

Techsneeze aims for a more polished user experience. Its installation process is similar, requiring a PHP and database setup, which means a certain level of technical proficiency is still needed.

The resulting web application, however, feels more responsive and modern. The interactive charts and filters enhance the analysis process, making it slightly more user-friendly for those accustomed to contemporary web dashboards and seeking a more dynamic way to explore their DMARC data.

As an open-source project, support for DMARC-SRG primarily comes from the community and the project's GitHub repository. While the documentation is available, direct, real-time support is not part of the package.

Users are expected to be self-reliant or lean on community forums for troubleshooting. If you encounter an issue, you'll likely be delving into the code or posting a question on the repository's issue tracker, hoping for a community member to respond.

Similarly, Techsneeze DMARCts is an open-source project. Support is community-driven, often through its GitHub repository or related developer forums. Its documentation is generally good, but like DMARC-SRG, it doesn't offer dedicated customer support channels.

Both tools are for those who prefer to "figure it out" themselves or have in-house technical expertise. Don't expect a support ticket system or a phone line; your best bet is usually a well-structured GitHub issue.

DMARC-SRG is particularly well-suited for individuals and small businesses (SMBs) who have a technical background and prefer a lightweight, self-hosted solution without complex features. It's a good fit for developers or system administrators who want to closely monitor DMARC compliance on their own infrastructure.

It's less ideal for large enterprises or managed service providers (MSPs) who require advanced reporting, multi-tenancy, or extensive support. For these larger entities, the manual overhead and lack of scalable features would quickly become a bottleneck. We wouldn't recommend it for mission-critical, high-volume environments.

Techsneeze DMARCts also caters to technical users and SMBs, offering a slightly more modern interface. It's a good choice for those who want a bit more visual flair than DMARC-SRG provides, but still prefer a self-hosted, open-source approach.

Like DMARC-SRG, it falls short for enterprise-level demands or MSPs needing comprehensive client management features, dedicated support, or advanced integrations. While its interface is a step up, its core functionality and self-hosted nature position it firmly in the realm of individual or small-team use, where direct control over data and infrastructure is paramount.