What are the main differences between DMARC Report and Open-DMARC-Analyzer?

The primary distinction lies in their nature: DMARC Report is a commercial, managed cloud service offering extensive features and support, while Open-DMARC-Analyzer is an open-source, self-hosted solution that provides core DMARC parsing with no direct cost, but requires technical expertise for setup and maintenance. DMARC Report covers more email security protocols, such as MTA-STS and BIMI, and includes features like SPF flattening and multi-tenancy. For more details on managed DMARC reporting, explore our platform at suped.com .

Which product is better for businesses without dedicated IT staff?

DMARC Report is generally better for businesses without dedicated IT staff due to its managed service model, user-friendly interface, and available customer support. Open-DMARC-Analyzer requires significant technical knowledge for deployment, ongoing maintenance, and troubleshooting, making it less suitable for non-technical teams.

Does Open-DMARC-Analyzer have any hidden costs?

While Open-DMARC-Analyzer software is free, it incurs costs related to its self-hosted nature. These include expenses for server infrastructure (e.g., VPS, cloud hosting), database, PHP packages, and the time commitment for installation, configuration, updates, and maintenance. There are no subscription fees, but operational costs are entirely the user's responsibility.

Can DMARC Report help with email deliverability issues beyond DMARC?

Yes, DMARC Report often integrates monitoring for other crucial email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and MTA-STS. By ensuring these are correctly configured and aligned, it can significantly improve overall email deliverability and sender reputation, helping emails land in inboxes rather than spam folders. This comprehensive approach addresses various factors impacting email delivery.

How do we get support for Open-DMARC-Analyzer?

Support for Open-DMARC-Analyzer is community-driven. Users typically rely on public documentation, project repositories, issue trackers, and community forums. There are no dedicated commercial support channels like email or phone support provided by the project creators. Users should be prepared to leverage their own technical skills or community resources for assistance.

Is multi-tenancy supported by either product for MSPs?

DMARC Report offers robust multi-tenancy features, specifically designed for MSPs, including group management and white-labeling options, allowing them to manage multiple client domains efficiently. Open-DMARC-Analyzer does not natively support multi-tenancy, requiring significant custom development to adapt it for managing multiple clients effectively. For managed DMARC solutions, explore Suped .

DMARC Report vs Open-DMARC-Analyzer

Choose DMARC Report for a managed platform, or Open-DMARC-Analyzer for self-hosted control.

4.8 / 5(325)

Compare to Suped

0 / 5(0)

Compare to Suped

Compare product functionality

Feature set

DMARC Report provides a comprehensive suite for email authentication, consolidating DMARC, SPF, DKIM, BIMI, and MTA-STS monitoring into a single platform. We found its dashboard offers clear insights into email traffic, highlighting authentication failures and potential spoofing attempts. The platform is designed to simplify complex DMARC data, making it accessible even for users without deep technical expertise.

It focuses on offering a complete service that includes reporting, analysis, and management tools to help organizations achieve DMARC compliance and protect their domain reputation effectively. It handles the parsing of raw DMARC XML data, which is notoriously difficult to read manually, and presents it in an actionable format. We appreciate the breadth of protocols covered, extending beyond DMARC itself.

Open-DMARC-Analyzer, being an open-source solution, gives users complete control over their DMARC reporting environment. It parses DMARC aggregate (RUA) and forensic (RUF) reports, displaying the data in a web-based interface. The primary functionality revolves around visualizing DMARC data, allowing for domain-specific filtering and detailed views of email sources.

We see it as a robust tool for those who prefer to manage their infrastructure and data locally. Its strength lies in its transparency and adaptability, as the codebase is open for inspection and modification. Users benefit from direct access to their data without reliance on third-party cloud services for data storage or processing. It requires a dedicated server environment with PHP and MariaDB, which means more hands-on involvement with deployment and maintenance. The core offering is DMARC data visualization, with other email security protocols not inherently integrated or monitored directly within the application itself.

How easy is each product to use

User experience

Setting up DMARC Report is generally a straightforward process, guided by step-by-step instructions for adding DNS records. The interface, while functional and comprehensive, has been described by some users as slightly dated, though we found it highly usable for daily tasks. Navigation is logical, allowing us to easily locate configuration options, reports, and alerts.

The system aims to simplify the often-complex world of email authentication, presenting data in a digestible format with clear visual cues for compliance status. Despite some minor aesthetic feedback, the focus on usability for DMARC management is evident, reducing the technical barrier for many. The automated weekly reports are particularly useful for quick status checks. It is well-suited for users who prefer a managed service that streamlines the entire DMARC process without requiring extensive command-line interaction or server management.

Open-DMARC-Analyzer offers an experience tailored for technically proficient users who are comfortable with self-hosting and server management. The initial setup involves deploying the application on a web server with PHP and MariaDB, which requires a solid understanding of these technologies. Once installed, the user interface provides a clear, no-frills visualization of DMARC reports. We appreciate its simplicity and directness, as it presents the parsed data without excessive abstraction.

The focus is purely on DMARC data, making it efficient for specific DMARC analysis. However, it lacks the guided onboarding and user-friendly helpers found in commercial products. Users need to be self-reliant for troubleshooting, updates, and any extensions of functionality. For those accustomed to open-source tools and command-line interfaces, the experience is empowering, offering granular control. For others, the lack of hand-holding might be a significant hurdle.

Which product has the best support

Support

DMARC Report offers structured support tiers, with email support ranging from basic to advanced depending on the subscription plan. We've observed generally responsive customer support, particularly for common setup and usage queries. Users on higher-tier plans receive more advanced assistance and onboarding.

While some users have reported minor delays or difficulties with highly specific technical questions, the overall sentiment points to a helpful and accessible support team. The platform aims to provide a managed experience, where assistance is available when navigating the complexities of DMARC. The emphasis on "white glove onboarding & assistance" for MSP plans suggests a dedication to client success, ensuring effective implementation and ongoing management.

As an open-source project, Open-DMARC-Analyzer does not come with traditional commercial support channels like dedicated email or phone support teams. Support is primarily community-driven, relying on forums, documentation, and the broader open-source ecosystem.

We find that users needing assistance typically turn to project repositories, issue trackers, or community discussions for help. This model means support availability and response times can vary greatly, depending on the complexity of the issue and the engagement of the community. Users must be prepared for a self-service approach to troubleshooting and problem-solving, leveraging their technical skills and available online resources. While this offers flexibility and cost savings, it requires a higher degree of technical autonomy.

Who should use each product

Suitability

DMARC Report is well-suited for a broad range of organizations, from SMBs to enterprises, and particularly shines for Managed Service Providers (MSPs). For SMBs and enterprises, its tiered plans offer scalable solutions based on email volume and domain count, simplifying DMARC compliance without needing specialized internal expertise. The platform's comprehensive features, coupled with structured support, make it an attractive option for companies prioritizing ease of use and a managed service.

For MSPs, the platform provides multi-tenancy capabilities, white-labeling options, and group management, enabling them to efficiently manage DMARC for multiple clients. This allows MSPs to offer DMARC monitoring and reporting as a value-added service, enhancing their client offerings and potentially generating additional revenue. It helps MSPs streamline client onboarding and ongoing email security management.

Open-DMARC-Analyzer is primarily best for technically skilled users or organizations with dedicated IT resources comfortable with self-hosting. It caters to those who prioritize complete control over their data and infrastructure, and are willing to manage the deployment and maintenance themselves. This makes it a strong contender for tech-savvy SMBs, larger enterprises with robust in-house IT teams, or even individual security researchers.

MSPs might find it less suitable if they are looking for a ready-to-deploy, white-labeled solution for numerous clients without significant custom development. While it offers flexibility, the lack of out-of-the-box multi-tenancy or advanced reporting features might necessitate considerable development effort for an MSP use case. It is generally not ideal for SMBs or enterprises without strong technical foundations, as the self-hosted nature introduces operational overhead.

How does DMARC Report compare with Open-DMARC-Analyzer?

DMARC report analysis

Parses DMARC XML reports into a readable format.

Full, detailed, user-friendly UI

Raw data parsing, web UI

Source detection

Identifies legitimate and illegitimate email sending sources.

Yes, identifies sending IPs/vendors

Yes, identifies sending IPs

Forward detection

Ability to identify email forwarding in DMARC reports.

Yes

Spoof detection

Identifies attempts to spoof your domain.

Yes, with alerts

Yes, visual identification

Notifications and alerts

Automated alerts for DMARC failures or suspicious activity.

Configurable email alerts

No native alerts

Reporting

Provides dashboards and generated reports.

Comprehensive dashboards, scheduled reports

Basic web-based visualization

API

Programmatic access to DMARC data and features.

Available in higher plans

Community/self-developed

Multi-tenancy

Ability to manage multiple client domains under one account.

Yes, for MSPs

No, requires custom setup

SPF flattening

Helps manage SPF record lookup limits.

Yes

No

Hosted DMARC

The platform hosts your DMARC record.

Yes

No

BIMI

Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.

Yes, monitoring and setup guidance

No

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Support for secure email transport protocols.

Yes, hosting and reporting

No

Blocklists and reputation

Monitors domain and IP reputation on blocklists (or blacklists).

Yes, in higher plans

No

AI copilot

AI-powered assistance for DMARC management.

No

DNS monitoring

Monitors DNS records for changes or misconfigurations.

Yes

No

Self hostable

Can be installed and run on your own servers.

No

Yes

Free trial/free tier

Offers a free period or a perpetually free usage tier.

Free plan available

Free to download and use

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

While DMARC Report offers extensive features, some users note its user interface could be more modern and fluid. We also found that very specific or niche support questions can sometimes take longer to resolve, and there's no chat option for quick assistance. The cost for smaller businesses might feel high if they only need basic DMARC monitoring beyond the free tier, and for those who value complete data sovereignty, it's a cloud-based service. The primary drawback of Open-DMARC-Analyzer is its self-hosted nature, which demands significant technical expertise and ongoing maintenance. There's no official customer support, relying instead on community resources. Its features are more basic, focusing purely on DMARC report parsing without integrating other security protocols or advanced functionalities like SPF flattening, blocklist (or blacklist) monitoring, or native alerts. It also lacks multi-tenancy and white-labeling, making it less suitable for MSPs without considerable custom development. This solution requires users to handle all infrastructure costs and security aspects themselves, which can be a hidden cost for those unprepared.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

4.8 / 5(325)

0 / 5(0)

Easy to setup and no errors

3.5 / 5

What do you like best about DMARC Report? Dmarc is critical to email deliverability and the tools they offer make it easier to set up than others I have tried. What do you dislike about DMARC Report? Still need a bit of technical skill to discern the forensic reports. What problems is DMARC Report solving and how is that benefiting you? Email Deliverability is critical to my business and DMARC report keeps me aware of issues with the authenticity of my site.

Nancy S.

Marketing Consultant Computer Software Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Easy configuration. Clear, easy to read reports.

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about DMARC Report? I find the whole SPF, DKIM, and DMARC configuration of email addresses to be thoroughly confusing. I have a technical bent, so I shouldn't be mystified, yet somehow I am. DMARC Report relieves most of this grief. The website has a clear, logical interface, so it's easy to find what I need. It tells me if I've misconfigured something. It sends me weekly reports of my deliverability stats, which are very easy to read. I'm not currently sending stuff out via mailing lists. I wanted to set up SPF, DKIM, and DMARC so I could be sure that my regular business email was getting delivered. DMARC Report has some advanced reporting of fancy threats that don't concern me yet, because my business is still small. What do you dislike about DMARC Report? The price is high for me, due to my business's small size. The pricing is geared for larger businesses. I hope to grow into needing that much capacity, but they're a bit of an ill fit for me at the moment. If your company is small and you use just one domain name, their Free plan might be all you need. I'm thinking of downgrading to that. What problems is DMARC Report solving and how is that benefiting you? I need the confidence that my email is configured properly to guarantee delivery. DMARC Report provides reports that are easy to read. I can see at a glance if I have a problem.

Ron B.

Owner Internet Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

DMARC Report is a must-have tool for elevating your email delivery

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about DMARC Report? It provides comprehensive insights into all messages sent from your domain, ensuring you have all the necessary information to maintain robust email security and improve deliverability. The detailed reports help identify and mitigate potential threats, making it an essential resource for any organization serious about email authentication. What do you dislike about DMARC Report? Support on a very specific question I had regarding my hosting business was hard to get answered. What problems is DMARC Report solving and how is that benefiting you? As described it is showing all messages that are being send from your domain.

Verified User in Computer Software

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

A Solid DMARC Management Experience

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about DMARC Report? My team and I enjoy the simplicity and effectivity of DMARC Report- it just works. Options are easy to find, the platform does exactly what it says it will do, and the value generated is great. Multi-Tenant capabilities are also a huge plus. What do you dislike about DMARC Report? The user interface needs a little work. I'd like it to ideally be a little more fluid, modern, and polished. It's not a deal breaker and is highly usable, but a touch up would be appreciated. What problems is DMARC Report solving and how is that benefiting you? Managing our clients DMARC can be chaotic and time consuming- this makes it easy putting everything in a clean easy report with tons of options for us to easily manage and configure our client's DMARC and other DNS settings.

Anthony R.

CEO Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Cost-effective and useful solution for DMARC report parsing

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about DMARC Report? Comprehensive email security solution with DMARC reporting, TLS, and more. What do you dislike about DMARC Report? It can be confusing to navigate the menus and occasionally it resets to the default domain. What problems is DMARC Report solving and how is that benefiting you? DMARC reports are largely unreadable to humans, and a parser is a must. DMARC Report has been great for both my own and my clients' domains, providing easy to digest reporting and giving insights into authentication problems as well as spoofing.

MV B.

Founder Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Pricing

DMARC Report provides tiered subscription plans with a free option, while Open-DMARC-Analyzer is open-source and free to use, incurring only self-hosting costs.

Small

Up to 10k emails / month

Free

Self-host, infrastructure costs apply

Medium

Up to 100k emails / month

$25/month

Self-host, infrastructure costs apply

Large

Up to 1 million emails / month

$75/month

Self-host, infrastructure costs apply