Suped

DMARC Monitor vs Open-DMARC-Analyzer

Choose DMARC Monitor for a managed service, Open-DMARC-Analyzer for self-hosting.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Monitor provides a robust, cloud-based platform for DMARC reporting and enforcement. We find its strength in simplifying complex DMARC data into actionable insights, making it accessible even for those new to email authentication. The platform is designed to handle the full lifecycle of DMARC implementation.
Beyond core DMARC aggregation, it offers features such as detailed source identification, spoofing detection, and tools to help achieve DMARC enforcement. It aims to provide a clear path to understanding email streams and protecting domain reputation, with a focus on a guided user experience.
Open-DMARC-Analyzer offers a powerful open-source solution for processing DMARC aggregate reports. Its core strength lies in providing direct access to raw DMARC data, allowing for highly customizable analysis and integration into existing infrastructure. It's ideal for users who prefer full control over their data.
While it provides fundamental DMARC reporting capabilities, such as SPF and DKIM authentication results and DMARC policy enforcement, its feature set is more foundational. Advanced features often require additional configuration, scripting, or integration with other tools, leaning heavily on the user's technical expertise.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
The user experience with DMARC Monitor is clearly designed for simplicity and efficiency. We found the dashboard intuitive, presenting key DMARC metrics and trends at a glance. Onboarding is guided, and the platform aims to reduce the steep learning curve often associated with DMARC implementation.
Data visualization is a strong point, with interactive charts and granular filters that allow us to drill down into specific email sources or authentication failures. It effectively translates complex email data into digestible formats, helping users make informed decisions quickly without needing extensive DMARC expertise.
Open-DMARC-Analyzer provides a functional interface, but its user experience is inherently tied to its self-hosted, open-source nature. We observe that initial setup requires technical proficiency in web server management, database configuration, and PHP. The interface, while clear, is less polished than commercial alternatives.
While it displays DMARC data effectively, including aggregate reports and authentication statistics, it lacks the advanced filtering, guided workflows, and proactive alerts found in managed solutions. Users should be comfortable with command-line operations and manual configurations to fully leverage its capabilities.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Monitor, being a commercial product, offers structured support channels. We found access to customer support, likely via email or a ticketing system, which is crucial for troubleshooting and guidance during DMARC deployment. The expectation is for timely and expert assistance.
Additionally, we expect a comprehensive knowledge base and documentation to be available, covering common issues, setup guides, and feature explanations. This level of support is invaluable for organizations seeking a managed solution with reliable assistance.
Support for Open-DMARC-Analyzer primarily comes from the open-source community. This means assistance is often found through forums, GitHub issues, or dedicated community channels. While helpful, responses might not be immediate or guaranteed.
For technical challenges or specific integrations, users rely heavily on self-sufficiency and the publicly available documentation. We've seen that deeper issues may require reviewing source code or reaching out to experienced developers, which can be a significant undertaking for those without in-house expertise.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Monitor is well-suited for a broad range of organizations, from SMBs seeking a straightforward DMARC solution to larger enterprises requiring comprehensive email security. Its managed service approach reduces the operational burden, making it attractive for companies without dedicated email security teams.
For MSPs (managed service providers), it offers a centralized platform to manage DMARC for multiple clients, potentially simplifying reporting and enforcement at scale. Its scalability and professional support make it a viable option for organizations prioritizing ease of use and a hands-off approach to DMARC management.
Open-DMARC-Analyzer is best suited for organizations with strong internal IT resources and a preference for self-hosting. This includes larger enterprises or tech-savvy SMBs that want complete control over their data and infrastructure, and are comfortable with the technical demands of managing an open-source solution.
MSPs could potentially adapt it for multi-tenancy, but this would require significant development effort and maintenance. It is an excellent choice for developers who wish to integrate DMARC reporting directly into their existing systems or customize the analytics to their specific needs.

How does DMARC Monitor compare with Open-DMARC-Analyzer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

While feature-rich, DMARC Monitor's pricing structure can be less transparent for higher volumes, and its dependency on a proprietary platform means less customization flexibility for highly specific use cases. The main drawbacks of Open-DMARC-Analyzer revolve around the significant technical overhead required for setup, maintenance, and the lack of dedicated professional support, making it less suitable for organizations without strong in-house IT expertise.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARC Monitor offers various tiered plans, including a free option, while Open-DMARC-Analyzer is open-source and free, incurring only self-hosting infrastructure costs.
Logo
Logo
Small
Free plan available
Self-hosted, minimal infrastructure
Medium
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, moderate infrastructure
Large
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, scaled infrastructure
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, scaled infrastructure

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC Monitor or Open-DMARC-Analyzer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions