Suped

DMARC Monitor vs DMARC-SRG

Choose DMARC Monitor for robust features, choose DMARC-SRG for a self-hosted, open-source solution.
DMARC-SRG
Compare to Suped
Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We found DMARC Monitor to be a comprehensive platform for DMARC reporting and enforcement. It offers detailed insights into email authentication, helping users understand SPF, DKIM, and DMARC alignment. The system is designed to provide clear visibility into sending sources, making it easier to identify legitimate and unauthorized email traffic.
DMARC Monitor also includes features beyond basic reporting, such as continuous monitoring and alerting for domain protection. It aims to simplify the complex world of email security, presenting data in an understandable format for various organizational sizes, from SMBs to larger enterprises.
DMARC-SRG, as an open-source tool, provides a different approach to DMARC reporting. Its core functionality revolves around parsing, viewing, and generating summary reports from DMARC aggregate reports. This means users gain granular control over their data, as it is self-hosted.
The strength of DMARC-SRG lies in its flexibility for those comfortable with managing their own infrastructure. While it offers essential DMARC insights, additional features like proactive alerts or advanced threat intelligence typically require custom development or integration with other tools.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our experience, DMARC Monitor offers a polished and intuitive user interface. The dashboards are well-organized, making it relatively straightforward to navigate through reports and identify critical authentication issues. Onboarding is guided, and setting up new domains feels streamlined, even for those new to DMARC.
The platform translates complex DMARC data into actionable insights, utilizing visual aids and clear explanations. This focus on user-friendliness makes it accessible to a wider audience, reducing the learning curve often associated with email security tools.
The user experience with DMARC-SRG is inherently different due to its self-hosted, open-source nature. Users interact with a web-based interface that requires initial setup and configuration. While functional for displaying reports, it lacks the modern polish and advanced interactive elements found in commercial tools.
For users with technical expertise, the raw data presentation and direct control can be appealing. However, those seeking a "plug-and-play" solution or extensive guided workflows might find the initial setup and ongoing management more challenging. It's a tool built for utility, not necessarily for a seamless, guided experience.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Monitor, as a commercial product, provides structured customer support. We'd expect dedicated support channels, likely including email, a ticketing system, and potentially phone support for higher-tier plans. Documentation would be professional and comprehensive, covering setup, troubleshooting, and feature utilization.
Response times would typically adhere to service level agreements, ensuring timely assistance for critical issues. This level of support is crucial for businesses that rely on external expertise to maintain their email security posture.
Support for DMARC-SRG primarily comes from the open-source community and self-help resources. Users can leverage the GitHub repository for issues, discussions, and community-driven solutions. While a maintainer might offer assistance, there are no formal support channels or guaranteed response times.
This model suits users who are self-sufficient, enjoy troubleshooting, and can contribute to or benefit from community knowledge. It means relying on your own technical capabilities or the goodwill of fellow users, rather than a paid support team.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
DMARC-SRG
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Monitor is well-suited for a broad spectrum of organizations. For SMBs, it provides an accessible entry point to DMARC, simplifying setup and reporting without requiring deep technical expertise. Enterprise clients will appreciate its scalability, advanced reporting features, and the potential for dedicated account management and robust support. For MSPs (Managed Service Providers), its multi-tenancy capabilities and comprehensive feature set make it an attractive option for managing DMARC for multiple clients efficiently.
It caters to those who prefer a managed service, allowing them to focus on their core business while relying on the platform for email authentication enforcement and protection against spoofing and phishing attempts.
DMARC-SRG is best suited for organizations with specific technical resources and a preference for open-source solutions. SMBs with limited IT staff might find the self-hosting requirement burdensome. Enterprise users might consider it if they need maximum data control and can integrate it into existing internal systems, but it would likely require significant custom development to match the feature parity of commercial tools. For MSPs, it's generally less suitable unless they have specialized development teams capable of customizing and maintaining separate instances for each client.
It's an excellent choice for individuals or teams who value full control over their data, are comfortable with PHP, and prefer not to incur recurring subscription costs, provided they can handle the operational overhead.

How does DMARC Monitor compare with DMARC-SRG?

Logo
DMARC-SRG
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Based on our observations, a potential drawback for DMARC Monitor is that detailed pricing for all tiers isn't immediately transparent on their main website, requiring further inquiry. While it offers a free plan, the scalability of its features for very large, complex environments might need direct consultation to ensure full alignment with specific needs. The primary drawbacks of DMARC-SRG stem from its open-source nature. It demands technical proficiency for setup, maintenance, and any desired customization. Lacking formal support channels and advanced features out-of-the-box means users are responsible for their own integrations, security, and updates, which can be a significant time investment.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
DMARC-SRG

Pricing

DMARC Monitor offers various paid plans with a free tier, while DMARC-SRG is an open-source tool, free to host and use for those with the technical know-how.
Logo
DMARC-SRG
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC Monitor or DMARC-SRG?
Logo
DMARC-SRG
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions