Suped

DMARC Manager vs ELK DMARC

Choose DMARC Manager for a hosted solution, ELK DMARC for self-hosted control.
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Manager offers a streamlined web interface for DMARC reporting, providing insights into email authentication results with clear visualizations. It automates the collection and aggregation of DMARC reports, simplifying the process of identifying legitimate and fraudulent email sources. We found its feature set comprehensive for typical DMARC enforcement needs, with an emphasis on ease of use.
The platform focuses on presenting complex DMARC data in an understandable format, making it accessible to users who may not have deep technical expertise. This includes detailed aggregate reports and simplified forensic report views, aiding in quick decision-making regarding DMARC policy adjustments and source identification.
ELK DMARC, being an open-source, self-hosted solution, provides raw access to your DMARC data within the powerful ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana). This means advanced users can build highly customized dashboards and alerts, tailoring the monitoring exactly to their requirements. Its strength lies in its flexibility and the direct control it offers over data storage and analysis.
While it provides robust analytical capabilities, configuring ELK DMARC requires a significant technical understanding of the ELK stack, Docker, and system administration. It's not a plug-and-play solution, but for those with the technical resources, it offers unparalleled depth in data exploration and integration with existing infrastructure. We appreciate the ability to deeply customize reports and investigations.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
The user experience with DMARC Manager is generally intuitive and geared towards simplicity. Its dashboard is well-organized, presenting key DMARC metrics and compliance rates upfront. Navigating through reports and identifying authentication issues feels straightforward, making it suitable for users who prioritize a managed service without heavy configuration.
We found the interface responsive and the data presentation clear. The learning curve is relatively gentle, allowing users to quickly get started with monitoring and understanding their DMARC reports. It's designed to minimize the operational overhead associated with DMARC management.
ELK DMARC's user experience is inherently different due to its self-hosted, open-source nature. The 'interface' is primarily Kibana, where users build their own dashboards and visualizations. This offers immense power and flexibility but comes with a steep learning curve for those unfamiliar with Kibana or Elasticsearch query language.
Initial setup requires considerable technical skill, involving Docker, system configuration, and ELK stack components. Once configured, data exploration is powerful but demands active management and customization. It's an excellent choice for technically proficient teams who prefer full control and a DIY approach, but less so for those seeking an out-of-the-box solution.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As a commercial product, DMARC Manager is expected to offer direct customer support. While specific details on their support channels (email, chat, phone) are not publicly detailed on their homepage, we assume a standard level of support for a SaaS platform. Users would typically rely on the vendor's team for troubleshooting and guidance.
For critical issues or detailed questions about the platform's functionality, customers would engage directly with DMARC Manager's support staff. This usually means a more guided and personalized support experience compared to community-driven models.
ELK DMARC, being an open-source project, relies primarily on community support. Users typically find assistance through GitHub issues, forums, or by consulting the project's documentation. This model means support can be highly variable, depending on the community's activity and the complexity of the issue.
While there isn't a dedicated support team in the traditional commercial sense, the open-source nature allows for direct contribution and peer assistance. However, for immediate or business-critical problems, users must be prepared to self-diagnose or have in-house expertise to resolve issues effectively.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Manager is well-suited for a range of users who prefer a managed, easy-to-use DMARC reporting solution. It's particularly strong for SMBs and mid-sized businesses that need to implement DMARC without the overhead of maintaining their own infrastructure.
For enterprise clients, it offers a scalable solution, provided their feature requirements align with the platform's offerings. MSPs could leverage its multi-tenancy capabilities, if offered, to manage multiple client domains efficiently through a single interface, making it a viable option for managing email security portfolios.
ELK DMARC is ideal for technically advanced organizations, particularly those with existing ELK stack expertise or a strong DevOps team. It's a powerful tool for enterprise users who require granular control over their data, advanced customization, and self-hosting capabilities due to compliance or data residency requirements.
While it can be adapted by MSPs or larger SMBs with technical staff, its complexity makes it less suitable for typical SMBs seeking a quick, low-maintenance solution. It shines in environments where data control and deep analytical insight are paramount, and the resources for setup and maintenance are readily available.

How does DMARC Manager compare with ELK DMARC?

Logo
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARC Manager's main drawback appears to be the lack of transparent pricing and public reviews, making it difficult to assess its overall value and user satisfaction without direct engagement. For ELK DMARC, the primary challenge is its inherent complexity; it demands significant technical expertise and resources for setup and ongoing maintenance, making it less accessible for non-technical users.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
ELK DMARC

Pricing

DMARC Manager offers a free trial but requires contacting them for detailed pricing, while ELK DMARC is free open-source software, incurring only infrastructure costs.
Logo
ELK DMARC
Small
Contact for pricing
Infrastructure costs
Medium
Contact for pricing
Infrastructure costs
Large
Contact for pricing
Infrastructure costs
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Infrastructure costs

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC Manager or ELK DMARC?
Logo
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions