Suped

DMARC Director vs ELK DMARC

Choose DMARC Director for a managed solution with active support, or ELK DMARC for a self-hosted, open-source approach.
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Director presents a polished dashboard for DMARC report aggregation and analysis. It excels at visualising DMARC data, making it straightforward to identify authentication issues, sending sources, and forwarding patterns. The platform focuses on providing clear insights without overwhelming users with raw data, which is beneficial for less technical teams.
We found its strength lies in distilling complex DMARC XML reports into actionable intelligence. The interface allows us to quickly pinpoint where DMARC records are failing or passing, offering a guided approach to achieve enforcement. It streamlines the monitoring process, helping to maintain a healthy email sending posture.
ELK DMARC, being an open-source solution built on the ELK stack, offers deep customization and granular control over DMARC data. It requires a solid understanding of Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana to set up and manage effectively. Once configured, it provides powerful querying capabilities and allows for highly specific data analysis and visualization.
The strength of ELK DMARC lies in its raw data access and the flexibility to build custom dashboards and alerts. We can slice and dice the DMARC reports in virtually any way imaginable, which is ideal for power users and organizations with dedicated IT or security teams. However, this flexibility comes with a significant setup and maintenance overhead.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
The user experience with DMARC Director is generally smooth and intuitive. The dashboard is well-organized, making it easy for new users to navigate and understand their DMARC compliance status. We found the setup process to be straightforward, primarily involving adding a DMARC record to point to their service.
However, while user-friendly, its structured nature means less room for deep customization compared to a self-hosted solution. The predefined reports and views are excellent for most use cases, but those with very specific analytical needs might find themselves wishing for more flexibility in data manipulation.
ELK DMARC offers a fundamentally different user experience. It is not an 'out-of-the-box' solution. The initial setup requires significant technical expertise in server management, Docker, and the ELK stack. Deploying it correctly can be a project in itself, and we certainly learned a few new tricks during the process.
Once operational, the user experience heavily depends on one's familiarity with Kibana. For those accustomed to building dashboards and queries in Kibana, it offers immense power. For others, it presents a steep learning curve, as the interface is raw and reflective of its open-source, configurable nature rather than a polished SaaS product.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Director, as a commercial product, offers dedicated support channels. We have experienced responsive assistance when reaching out with queries about report interpretation or platform functionality. This managed approach provides a safety net, especially for organizations that prefer not to handle complex technical issues internally.
The support includes guidance on DMARC policy adjustments and troubleshooting deliverability concerns based on the reports. This level of hands-on support is a significant advantage for businesses that need external expertise to navigate the intricacies of email authentication and DMARC enforcement.
ELK DMARC's support model is community-driven. Being an open-source project, official dedicated support akin to a commercial SaaS offering is not available. We rely on documentation, the GitHub repository, and the wider ELK Stack community for troubleshooting and guidance.
For those comfortable with self-help and engaging with open-source communities, this can be sufficient. However, for critical issues or a rapid resolution, the lack of guaranteed, direct technical support can be a considerable drawback. It requires internal expertise to diagnose and resolve problems with the deployment.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Director is particularly suitable for small to medium businesses (SMBs) and enterprises that prefer a managed solution. Its intuitive interface and direct support make it an excellent choice for organizations that need DMARC compliance without deep technical diving into the reports.
Managed Service Providers (MSPs) would also find DMARC Director appealing due to its streamlined management and reporting capabilities across multiple clients. It simplifies the task of monitoring and enforcing DMARC, allowing MSPs to offer value-added email security services efficiently.
ELK DMARC is best suited for organizations with significant internal technical resources, including large enterprises, or those already heavily invested in the ELK Stack. It appeals to users who prioritize complete control over their data, require extensive customization, and are comfortable with self-hosting and managing their infrastructure.
While not explicitly built for MSPs, a technically proficient MSP could deploy and manage separate instances of ELK DMARC for different clients, given sufficient expertise and resources. However, it's generally less ideal for SMBs due to the high technical barrier to entry and ongoing maintenance requirements.

How does DMARC Director compare with ELK DMARC?

Logo
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARC Director's main drawback is its lack of transparent pricing and potentially limited customization options for advanced users who want granular control over their data. ELK DMARC, while powerful, comes with a significant technical overhead for setup, maintenance, and the absence of direct vendor support, which can be a barrier for many organizations.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
ELK DMARC

Pricing

DMARC Director requires contacting sales for pricing, while ELK DMARC is open-source, incurring costs primarily for hosting infrastructure.
Logo
ELK DMARC
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted), infrastructure costs apply
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted), infrastructure costs apply
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted), infrastructure costs apply
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted), infrastructure costs apply

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC Director or ELK DMARC?
Logo
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions