Suped

DMARC Director vs DMARC Visualizer

Choose DMARC Director for a comprehensive DMARC management platform, or DMARC Visualizer for an open-source, self-hosted reporting solution.
DMARC Visualizer
Compare to Suped
Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC Director offers a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting and management features, allowing for detailed analysis of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports. It provides tools for identifying legitimate sending sources, detecting spoofing attempts, and managing DMARC policy enforcement. We find its dashboard provides an overview that helps in understanding DMARC compliance.
The platform includes capabilities for active management of DMARC records, often incorporating elements like SPF flattening and hosted DMARC services to simplify DNS management. It aims to provide a full-service experience for organizations looking to secure their email domains and maintain strong sender reputation.
As an open-source tool, DMARC Visualizer provides core DMARC report visualization by leveraging parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana. It excels at breaking down aggregate reports into digestible graphs and tables, helping users understand DMARC authentication rates for SPF and DKIM, as well as sender compliance.
Its feature set is centered on data presentation, offering granular insights into email sources, DMARC alignment, and reporting over time. While it requires manual setup and configuration of its underlying components, it offers immense flexibility for users who prefer a self-hosted solution and have the technical expertise to manage it.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We find the user interface of DMARC Director to be professional and structured, typical of a commercial SaaS platform. The navigation is intuitive, guiding users through report analysis, policy management, and other settings. It aims for ease of use, reducing the technical burden on the end-user.
The setup process typically involves delegating DMARC report reception to their service, which then processes and presents the data. While effective, there is a learning curve to fully utilize all the advanced features and reporting customizations available within its comprehensive dashboard.
DMARC Visualizer is an open-source project requiring a hands-on approach to deployment and configuration. Users must set up parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana, which demands significant technical expertise in server management and data visualization tools. The "user experience" here is largely about the experience of interacting with Grafana dashboards, which are highly customizable but require effort to build and refine.
There is no plug-and-play installation, it's a DIY solution. For those comfortable with the underlying technologies, the flexibility to create custom dashboards and reports is a major advantage. However, for those lacking technical resources, the initial setup can be quite challenging and time-consuming.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As a commercial product, DMARC Director typically offers structured customer support. This often includes email support, phone support, and potentially a knowledge base or documentation. For enterprise clients, dedicated account managers or priority support might be available. We anticipate prompt responses and guided assistance for setup, troubleshooting, and best practices.
The level of support can vary by pricing tier, but the expectation is that users can rely on the vendor for help with both platform functionality and DMARC-related queries. This is a significant advantage for organizations that require external assistance.
Being an open-source project, formal customer support is not provided for DMARC Visualizer. Support is primarily community-driven, available through GitHub issues, forums, or online communities related to parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana. Users are responsible for their own implementation, maintenance, and troubleshooting.
While the community can be helpful, there are no guarantees of response times or solutions. This model suits users who are self-sufficient and comfortable with researching and resolving issues independently, or who have internal technical teams capable of providing support.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We find DMARC Director to be particularly suitable for enterprise-level organizations and Managed Service Providers (MSPs) managing multiple client domains. Its robust feature set, structured support, and emphasis on policy enforcement align well with the complex needs of larger entities. It provides a more hands-off, managed approach to DMARC.
For Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs) with less technical staff or those seeking a turnkey solution, DMARC Director could also be a strong contender, provided its pricing aligns with their budget. It simplifies the DMARC journey, making it accessible to those who prioritize convenience and comprehensive features.
DMARC Visualizer is best suited for technically proficient individuals or organizations who prefer an open-source, self-hosted solution. This includes developers, system administrators, or security teams within larger organizations that have the resources to deploy and maintain the necessary infrastructure (Elasticsearch, Grafana, parsedmarc).
It is less suitable for SMBs or MSPs looking for a managed service, as it requires significant technical investment and ongoing maintenance. While it offers cost savings in terms of licensing, the operational costs in terms of time and expertise can be substantial. It's ideal for those who want full control over their data and visualization.

How does DMARC Director compare with DMARC Visualizer?

Logo
DMARC Visualizer
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARC Director's main drawback is its lack of transparent pricing, making it hard for prospective users to gauge costs without direct engagement. For DMARC Visualizer, the primary challenge lies in its self-hosted nature, which demands significant technical expertise and ongoing maintenance, making it unsuitable for less technical teams.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
DMARC Visualizer

Pricing

DMARC Director offers a 30-day free trial and requires direct contact for pricing details, while DMARC Visualizer is an entirely free and open-source solution.
Logo
DMARC Visualizer
Small
Contact for pricing
Free
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free
Large
Contact for pricing
Free
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC Director or DMARC Visualizer?
Logo
DMARC Visualizer
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARC Director vs DMARC Visualizer DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped