Suped

DMARC Digests by Postmark vs KDmarc

Choose DMARC Digests by Postmark if you need a simple, hosted solution. Choose KDmarc if you need a self-hostable, open-source platform.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We found DMARC Digests to be a focused tool, providing clear, actionable insights into DMARC reports. It helps us quickly understand who is sending email on our behalf and identify potential abuse. The simplicity is a strong point here, as it cuts through the noise to give us just what we need to enforce DMARC.
It excels at presenting DMARC data in an easily digestible format, making it straightforward to see authentication results for SPF and DKIM. While it doesn't offer a vast array of advanced features, its core functionality for DMARC monitoring is robust and reliable, providing sufficient data for most users looking to get started with DMARC enforcement.
KDmarc provides a more hands-on approach, being a self-hostable and open-source solution. This gives us immense flexibility and control over our DMARC data. We can customize it to fit our specific infrastructure and reporting needs, which is a significant advantage for those with technical expertise.
Beyond basic reporting, KDmarc's open-source nature means we can integrate it deeply with other systems and build custom analytics. While it requires more effort to set up and maintain compared to a hosted solution, its extensible architecture allows for a comprehensive DMARC management system tailored to unique requirements, especially for larger organizations or MSPs.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We appreciate the clean and intuitive interface of DMARC Digests. Setting up a domain is quick and straightforward, and the reports are presented clearly, making it easy to spot trends and issues. For anyone who prefers a minimalist dashboard without unnecessary complexity, this is a breath of fresh air. It's designed for efficiency, allowing us to get our DMARC reporting done without a steep learning curve.
The guided actionable advice is particularly helpful for DMARC newcomers. It tells us exactly what steps to take, removing much of the guesswork. While it lacks some of the deep-dive analytical tools of more complex platforms, its focus on clarity and ease of use makes DMARC management accessible to a wider audience.
The user experience with KDmarc is inherently different, given its self-hostable nature. Setting it up requires technical proficiency, involving server configuration and possibly database management. However, once deployed, the web interface is functional and provides comprehensive data. It's less "out-of-the-box" polished than a commercial SaaS, but it offers powerful data views for those who know how to wield them.
Because it's open source, the UI can be adapted or enhanced by users. We found that while it may not have the instant appeal of a managed service, its raw data access and customizable dashboards provide a superior experience for engineers or those who prefer to build their own reporting environment. It's a tool built for technical users by technical users.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
We've found Postmark's support to be responsive and knowledgeable. Their "friendly human support" lives up to its name, providing clear answers and helpful guidance for any issues we encountered. For a service that emphasizes simplicity, good support is crucial, and they deliver.
Their support team is well-versed in DMARC intricacies, making it easy to troubleshoot authentication failures or reporting anomalies. The comprehensive documentation also complements their direct support, providing self-help resources that are quite effective.
Support for KDmarc primarily comes from its vibrant open-source community. While there isn't a dedicated support team in the traditional sense, we've found the forums and community channels to be excellent resources for troubleshooting and best practices. For those comfortable with community-driven support, this model works well.
For organizations needing guaranteed service levels, this might be a consideration, but the active development and user base mean that solutions and advice are often readily available. The nature of open-source software often means a collaborative problem-solving environment, which can be very effective if you know where to look.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
This product is ideally suited for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) or individuals who need a straightforward and reliable DMARC monitoring solution without heavy technical overhead. It's excellent for those just starting their DMARC journey or who prefer a hands-off approach to infrastructure.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), it could be suitable for managing a few client domains, but its per-domain pricing model and lack of native multi-tenancy features might make it less scalable for a large number of clients. Enterprise-level organizations might find it too simplistic if they require extensive customization, integration, or deep-dive analytics across many domains.
KDmarc is an excellent fit for organizations with strong technical teams, particularly those in the enterprise sector or MSPs who require full control and customization. Its self-hostable and open-source nature makes it perfect for environments with strict data sovereignty requirements or those needing to integrate DMARC reporting deeply into existing security and reporting systems.
MSPs can leverage its flexibility to build a tailored DMARC offering for multiple clients under a single, controlled infrastructure. For SMBs, the initial setup and ongoing maintenance might be a barrier, making it less suitable unless they have dedicated IT staff with the necessary expertise. It provides the power, but also demands the technical investment.

How does DMARC Digests by Postmark compare with KDmarc?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARC Digests by Postmark is a simple tool, which is both a strength and a weakness, limiting advanced features. Its per-domain pricing can also add up. KDmarc, while powerful, demands significant technical expertise for setup and maintenance, and relies on community support rather than a dedicated team, which might not suit all organizations.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARC Digests by Postmark offers a flat per-domain fee, while KDmarc is free, being an open-source solution.
Logo
Logo
Small
$14/month/domain
Free (open source)
Medium
$14/month/domain
Free (open source)
Large
$14/month/domain
Free (open source)
Enterprise
$14/month/domain
Free (open source)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC Digests by Postmark or KDmarc?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARC Digests by Postmark vs KDmarc DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped