Suped

DMARC 25 vs Open-DMARC-Analyzer

Choose DMARC 25 for a managed solution, choose Open-DMARC-Analyzer for self-hosted control.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC 25 offers a robust, cloud-based platform designed for comprehensive DMARC report analysis. From our experience, it excels at consolidating DMARC reports, providing clear visualizations of email authentication results, and simplifying the process of identifying legitimate and fraudulent email sources. We found its interface quite intuitive for understanding complex DMARC data at a glance.
This platform also includes features aimed at improving deliverability beyond just DMARC, such as helping identify issues that might lead to emails landing in spam folders. While it handles the core DMARC aggregation and reporting with aplomb, some of the more advanced features you might find in a dedicated DMARC management tool, such as SPF flattening or active remediation actions, might be less prominent or require manual intervention.
Open-DMARC-Analyzer provides a powerful open-source solution for processing DMARC aggregate reports. We appreciate its commitment to offering a full-featured, self-hosted system, giving users complete control over their data and infrastructure. It's excellent for parsing vast quantities of XML reports and presenting the raw data in a digestible format, helping us understand authentication trends and potential abuse.
As an open-source project, its feature set is primarily focused on the core task of DMARC report analysis. While it effectively identifies sources and authentication failures, it typically doesn't extend into value-added features like DNS monitoring, advanced blocklist checks, or proactive SPF/DKIM record management found in commercial tools. Its strength lies in its transparency and the ability to customize it if you have the technical resources.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Using DMARC 25 is generally a straightforward experience. Its web interface is clean and organized, allowing us to navigate through reports and analytics without much fuss. Setting up new domains and configuring DMARC records felt intuitive, guided by clear instructions.
The dashboards provide good summaries, making it easy for both technical and non-technical users to grasp their DMARC posture. While there's always a learning curve with any DMARC tool, DMARC 25 minimizes this with its user-friendly design and logical flow for managing policies and viewing authentication results.
The user experience for Open-DMARC-Analyzer is significantly different, primarily due to its self-hosted nature. Initial setup requires a solid understanding of web servers (PHP 7.4+), databases (MariaDB 10.5+), and general system administration. For those comfortable with these technologies, the installation process is well-documented.
Once deployed, the interface is functional and provides the necessary data, but it lacks the polish and advanced interactive elements of commercial platforms. It's more about raw data presentation and less about guided workflows. For technical users, this direct access can be powerful, but for others, it might feel like more work than they bargained for.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As a commercial product, DMARC 25 provides dedicated support channels. We found that they offer assistance via phone and web forms, with published reception hours. This structured support is a major advantage for businesses that require timely and direct help with their DMARC implementation or troubleshooting.
Our interactions with their support team were generally positive, with responses being informative and helpful. Having direct access to specialists can significantly ease the burden of managing DMARC, especially when dealing with complex authentication issues or policy adjustments.
Open-DMARC-Analyzer, being an open-source project, relies on community-driven support. This means there isn't a dedicated support team to call or email. Assistance typically comes from forums, GitHub issues, and the project's documentation.
For users who are comfortable with self-help and engaging with a community, this can be effective. However, for organizations needing immediate, guaranteed assistance or those without in-house technical experts, the lack of formal support could be a significant hurdle. It requires more self-sufficiency and problem-solving initiative.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC 25 is best suited for Managed Service Providers (MSPs), Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs), and enterprises that prefer a managed solution for their DMARC needs. If your organization lacks deep in-house email security expertise or simply wants to offload the complexities of DMARC monitoring and reporting, DMARC 25 offers a convenient and accessible platform.
It's particularly strong for MSPs looking to offer DMARC services to multiple clients without the overhead of maintaining individual open-source instances. For enterprises, it provides a streamlined way to oversee domain security without extensive technical integration work.
Open-DMARC-Analyzer is ideal for organizations with strong in-house IT capabilities, developers, or system administrators who prefer self-hosting and full control over their data. This includes tech-savvy SMBs, larger enterprises with specific privacy requirements, or any entity looking to build a customized DMARC solution on their own infrastructure.
While MSPs could technically build their DMARC offering around this open-source tool, it would require significant investment in development and maintenance compared to leveraging a purpose-built multi-tenant commercial platform. It's an excellent choice for those who value flexibility, transparency, and minimal ongoing software costs at the expense of infrastructure management.

How does DMARC 25 compare with Open-DMARC-Analyzer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering the drawbacks, DMARC 25's primary challenge is its lack of transparent pricing, which can complicate initial budget planning. It also means committing to a vendor's roadmap rather than having full control. Open-DMARC-Analyzer, while free in software cost, demands considerable technical investment for setup, maintenance, and ongoing operational costs, and relies solely on community support without any official channels.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

The pricing models are fundamentally different: DMARC 25 operates on an opaque, contact-for-quote basis, while Open-DMARC-Analyzer is open-source software with no direct cost, though it incurs self-hosting expenses.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
For DMARC 25, obtaining pricing details requires direct engagement with their sales team. They offer a one-month free trial, but beyond that, specific costs are not publicly disclosed. To get a quote, one must:
* Contact by phone at 03-5704-9948 during reception hours (9:00-18:00, weekdays).
* Utilize the "Contact by WEB" form available on their website.
Open-DMARC-Analyzer is an open-source solution under the GNU GPLv3 license, meaning the software itself is free to use, study, share, and modify. However, users opting for this solution must account for their own hosting infrastructure costs, including servers (e.g., a webserver supporting PHP 7.4+), databases (e.g., MariaDB 10.5+), and any associated PHP packages or system administration effort.

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC 25 or Open-DMARC-Analyzer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions