Suped

DMARC 25 vs DMARCLytics

Choose DMARC 25 for deep analytics or DMARCLytics for a structured, user-friendly approach.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our experience, DMARC 25 offers a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting and analysis tools. It focuses heavily on deep insights, providing granular data that allows for meticulous policy enforcement and domain protection. We find its data presentation to be thorough, especially for technical users who need to drill down into specifics.
The platform provides robust monitoring capabilities, helping us identify authentication failures and potential spoofing attempts efficiently. Its core strength lies in its ability to handle complex DMARC environments, making it suitable for organizations with diverse email sending infrastructure.
DMARCLytics presents a well-rounded feature set, emphasizing ease of use alongside essential DMARC reporting functionalities. We observed that it delivers clear, actionable insights, simplifying the process of achieving DMARC enforcement. It’s designed to guide users through the DMARC journey effectively.
Beyond basic reporting, DMARCLytics includes features like service tracking and inbox placement testing in its higher tiers, which extend its utility beyond just DMARC. These additions provide a more holistic view of email deliverability, a welcome inclusion for those looking for broader email health metrics.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Navigating DMARC 25’s interface is generally straightforward, though it can feel a bit dense for new users due to the sheer volume of data and options. We appreciate its functional design, which prioritizes detailed information over flashy aesthetics. It’s clearly built for power users who know exactly what they’re looking for.
The learning curve is manageable, but some areas might require a deeper understanding of DMARC specifics to fully leverage its capabilities. Once accustomed, we found the dashboards to be efficient for monitoring large email ecosystems.
DMARCLytics shines in its user experience, offering an intuitive and clean interface. We found it very easy to get started and understand the core reports, even for those new to DMARC. The dashboards are visually appealing and present information in an easily digestible format.
The platform's guided approach helps users interpret data and make informed decisions without feeling overwhelmed. Its focus on clear visualizations and simplified workflows makes it highly accessible for teams of varying technical expertise.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC 25 emphasizes direct contact for support, as indicated by their pricing information. We found that their approach leans towards personalized assistance, suggesting that complex issues are handled with dedicated attention. This often implies a more hands-on, consultative support model.
While we didn't experience the full breadth of their support, the emphasis on direct communication via phone and web form suggests a more traditional, perhaps less self-service, support structure. This can be beneficial for those who prefer direct human interaction for troubleshooting.
DMARCLytics offers email support across all its plans, providing a reliable channel for assistance. For higher-tier plans, specifically Enterprise, they include a dedicated DMARC engineer, which is a significant value add for larger organizations needing specialized expertise.
Their support model appears well-structured, scaling with the complexity and needs of different user tiers. The provision of a dedicated engineer for enterprise clients suggests a commitment to ensuring advanced users receive tailored and proactive assistance.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC 25 appears best suited for enterprises and larger organizations that require deep DMARC analytics and a hands-on approach to email security. Its comprehensive data presentation caters to technical teams who need to meticulously manage and enforce DMARC policies across complex infrastructures.
For MSPs (managed service providers), its robust data capabilities could be valuable, but the lack of explicit multi-tenancy features in public information might require custom solutions. SMBs might find its depth overkill or its pricing structure less transparent compared to tiered solutions.
DMARCLytics is a strong contender for SMBs and growing businesses, especially with its clearly defined tiered pricing and user-friendly interface. Its advanced features in business and enterprise plans also make it suitable for larger organizations looking for a balance of ease of use and comprehensive tools.
MSPs could benefit from DMARCLytics, particularly with its unlimited domains offering in the Enterprise plan, which facilitates managing multiple client domains efficiently. Its structured feature set allows businesses to scale their DMARC protection as their needs evolve, without immediate heavy investment.

How does DMARC 25 compare with DMARCLytics?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When evaluating DMARC 25, a notable drawback is its lack of transparent public pricing, which requires direct contact for quotes. This can be a barrier for initial comparison and budgeting. Its interface, while functional, might also present a steeper learning curve for users less familiar with granular email authentication data. For DMARCLytics, while it offers clear pricing for its Starter and Business plans, its Enterprise pricing also requires direct inquiry. Furthermore, some advanced features like BIMI and MTA-STS are not explicitly mentioned in their offerings, which could be a consideration for organizations with highly specific security requirements.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARC 25 operates on a contact-for-pricing model for all its paid services, whereas DMARCLytics offers transparent tiered pricing for smaller to medium-sized needs before requiring enterprise-level quotes.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
£9.99/month (Starter)
Medium
Contact for pricing
£9.99/month (Starter)
Large
Contact for pricing
£30/month (Business)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC 25 or DMARCLytics?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARC 25 vs DMARCLytics DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped