Suped

DMARC 25 vs DMARC report viewer

Choose DMARC 25 for comprehensive managed services or DMARC report viewer for a self-hosted, open-source solution.
DMARC report viewer
Compare to Suped
Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC 25 provides a robust set of features tailored for organizations seeking a managed approach to DMARC. It focuses on offering a complete service package, including detailed DMARC report analysis, clear sender identification, and actionable insights. The platform aims to simplify the complexities of email authentication for its users.
We found that DMARC 25 is designed to handle the full lifecycle of DMARC implementation and monitoring, from initial setup to ongoing enforcement. Its emphasis is on providing a comprehensive, hands-off solution, allowing businesses to secure their email without needing deep internal DMARC expertise.
The DMARC report viewer offers a foundational set of features primarily centered around parsing and visualizing DMARC aggregate reports. As an open-source tool, its core functionality is to take raw DMARC XML data and present it in a more human-readable format, making it easier to understand email authentication results.
Our experience indicates that while it covers the basics of DMARC report analysis, it does not extend to the more advanced, proactive security features found in commercial offerings. It's a great starting point for those who want direct control over their data and a transparent understanding of how DMARC reports are processed.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our testing, DMARC 25 offers a streamlined and intuitive user interface. The dashboards are well-organized, providing clear overviews of DMARC compliance, threat landscapes, and sending sources. The commercial nature of the product means significant effort has been invested in making the user journey as smooth as possible, even for those new to DMARC.
We appreciate the guided setup processes and the logical flow of information. It feels like a professionally crafted tool where ease of use is a priority, allowing users to quickly grasp their DMARC posture without getting bogged down in technical jargon or complex navigation.
The user experience for the DMARC report viewer is inherently different due to its open-source, self-hosted nature. While the interface for viewing reports is functional, the initial setup requires a good understanding of server environments and configuration. It's less of a 'plug-and-play' solution and more of a 'roll-up-your-sleeves-and-configure' experience.
Once set up, the report visualization is clear, though perhaps not as aesthetically refined as a dedicated commercial product. For users comfortable with command lines and server administration, this presents no significant barrier, but for others, it could be a steep learning curve.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As a commercial offering, DMARC 25 provides dedicated support channels. We expect direct access to assistance via phone and web contact forms, indicating a more structured and professional support system. This is crucial for businesses that rely on prompt resolution of DMARC-related issues and prefer personalized guidance.
The availability of business hours for phone support, along with an online contact form, suggests a commitment to helping users navigate the platform and address any DMARC challenges. This level of direct support can be invaluable for maintaining email security and deliverability.
The DMARC report viewer, being an open-source project, relies on community-driven support. This means users typically find help through GitHub issues, online forums, or by consulting the project's documentation. There isn't a dedicated support team to call or email for immediate assistance.
While community support can be highly effective, especially for well-maintained open-source projects, it often requires more self-sufficiency and patience. For organizations that need guaranteed service level agreements (SLAs) or immediate expert intervention, this model might not be suitable.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
DMARC report viewer
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARC 25 is best suited for organizations that prioritize a comprehensive, managed DMARC solution. This includes SMBs and enterprises looking for an external provider to handle the complexities of email authentication. Its structured support and polished user experience make it ideal for teams with limited internal DMARC expertise.
Managed Service Providers (MSPs) would also find DMARC 25 appealing for its potential to offer a robust DMARC service to their clients without significant overhead in development or management. If you need a full-service partner for DMARC, DMARC 25 is certainly worth considering.
The DMARC report viewer shines for technical users, developers, and organizations with the in-house IT resources and expertise to self-host and manage an application. It is a fantastic choice for those who prefer an open-source solution, want full control over their data, and are comfortable with the initial setup and ongoing maintenance.
For very small businesses (SMBs) with technical capabilities, or individuals and smaller teams operating on a tight budget, it offers a cost-effective way to gain DMARC visibility. However, enterprises and MSPs requiring robust support and a fully managed solution may find its self-hosted nature and community support model less suitable.

How does DMARC 25 compare with DMARC report viewer?

Logo
DMARC report viewer
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering drawbacks, DMARC 25's main challenge is its lack of transparent pricing, which requires direct contact for quotes. This can be a hurdle for organizations looking for immediate cost estimates. For the DMARC report viewer, the primary drawback is the necessity for self-hosting and the associated technical expertise required for setup, maintenance, and ongoing management, as it lacks dedicated vendor support and more advanced features found in commercial solutions.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
DMARC report viewer

Pricing

DMARC 25's pricing is not publicly disclosed, requiring a direct quote, while the DMARC report viewer is an entirely free, open-source solution that users self-host.
Logo
DMARC report viewer
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARC 25 or DMARC report viewer?
Logo
DMARC report viewer
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARC 25 vs DMARC report viewer DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped