Suped

Centera DMARC Compliance vs Fraudmarc Community Edition

Choose Centera DMARC Compliance for a managed experience, or Fraudmarc Community Edition for self-hosted DMARC reporting.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Centera DMARC Compliance offers a robust suite of features designed for comprehensive DMARC management. We found its DMARC report analysis to be highly visual, making it easy to identify sending sources and compliance issues. The platform automates much of the data interpretation, which is particularly helpful for those who prefer an 'at-a-glance' understanding of their email ecosystem.
The focus here is on simplifying the complex world of email authentication. It provides clear insights into sender policy framework (SPF), domainkeys identified mail (DKIM), and DMARC alignment, helping us move domains towards a strict DMARC enforcement policy with confidence. Forward detection and spoof detection are also integrated, offering a more complete picture of email traffic.
Fraudmarc Community Edition, in contrast, is an open-source, self-managed solution that provides the raw ingredients for DMARC reporting. It's designed for advanced users who are comfortable with a more hands-on approach. The core functionality lies in parsing DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, giving us the foundational data to analyze our email streams.
While it delivers the essential DMARC data, we noticed that many of the advanced features, such as automated source categorization or sophisticated visualization, require custom development or integration from our side. It is a powerful tool for those with the technical expertise to build their own reporting and alerting mechanisms on top of the raw data provided.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Using Centera DMARC Compliance, we found the user interface to be intuitive and well-organized. The dashboard provides a clear overview of DMARC compliance, and drilling down into specific reports is straightforward. Setup involves updating DNS records, which is a standard procedure, and the platform guides us through it.
For users who prefer a streamlined, graphical interface that minimizes manual data interpretation, Centera DMARC Compliance excels. The learning curve is relatively gentle, allowing us to quickly get up to speed with our DMARC journey without needing deep technical knowledge of email protocols.
Fraudmarc Community Edition presents a different user experience entirely. As a self-hosted solution, the 'user experience' often begins with the installation and configuration process, which requires comfort with command-line interfaces and server management. There isn't a pre-built, polished web interface out of the box; instead, users typically leverage the parsed data in their own tools or dashboards.
For us, this meant a significant initial setup effort. It's an excellent choice if we want complete control over our data and infrastructure, but it's far from a 'plug-and-play' solution. The experience is tailored for technical professionals who enjoy the freedom and flexibility of open-source tools, rather than those seeking a ready-made SaaS platform.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
With Centera DMARC Compliance, we expect a level of dedicated customer support typical of a commercial SaaS product. While specific details on support tiers weren't provided, such platforms generally offer email support, a knowledge base, and potentially live chat or phone support for higher-tier plans.
This means that if we encounter an issue or have a question, we have a direct line to the vendor's support team. This can be invaluable when dealing with the complexities of DMARC and email deliverability, providing peace of mind and quicker resolution times.
Fraudmarc Community Edition's support model is, as its name suggests, community-driven. Our primary resource for assistance is the community forum. This means that while we can find answers to common questions and solutions to problems encountered by others, there's no official vendor support team to contact directly.
We found that troubleshooting often relies on our own technical skills and the willingness of other community members to help. This model works well for open-source enthusiasts but might be a significant drawback for organizations requiring guaranteed response times or dedicated technical assistance for critical issues.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Centera DMARC Compliance is highly suitable for small to medium businesses (SMBs) and enterprises that require a managed DMARC solution without the heavy lifting of raw data analysis. It's a good fit for organizations prioritizing ease of use, comprehensive reporting, and proactive DMARC enforcement. Managed Service Providers (MSPs) might find it useful for their clients, but multi-tenancy capabilities would be a key consideration.
We see this product serving companies that want to quickly implement and maintain DMARC compliance, reducing the risk of email spoofing and brand impersonation, without needing a dedicated email security expert on staff to manage the tool itself.
Fraudmarc Community Edition is best suited for technically proficient users, such as developers, system administrators, or small teams with a strong DevOps culture. Its open-source nature makes it an attractive option for those who want complete control over their DMARC data processing and prefer self-hosting.
For MSPs, this could be a foundation to build custom DMARC services for their clients, provided they have the internal resources for development and ongoing maintenance. However, it is less suitable for non-technical SMBs or large enterprises that require a fully supported, out-of-the-box solution and do not wish to invest in significant internal development and maintenance for DMARC reporting.

How does Centera DMARC Compliance compare with Fraudmarc Community Edition?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering drawbacks, Centera DMARC Compliance, being a commercial SaaS, typically comes with a cost that scales with usage. Its comprehensive nature might also mean less flexibility for highly customized scenarios compared to an open-source tool. Fraudmarc Community Edition, while free and flexible, demands significant technical expertise for setup, maintenance, and deriving actionable insights, and relies solely on community support.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Centera DMARC Compliance requires contacting them for pricing details, whereas Fraudmarc Community Edition is a free, self-managed offering.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free
Large
Contact for pricing
Free
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-managed)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Centera DMARC Compliance or Fraudmarc Community Edition?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions