Agari Brand Protection is a comprehensive platform designed for large organizations. It extends beyond basic DMARC reporting to offer advanced threat protection, including phishing and spoofing defense. We found its feature set to be robust, covering a wide array of email security needs that go far beyond just DMARC.
The platform integrates DMARC enforcement with broader brand protection strategies, monitoring various channels for abuse. It provides detailed analytics on email streams, identifying both legitimate and fraudulent senders. We appreciated its ability to handle complex email infrastructures and its focus on preventing advanced email attacks.
DMARC 25 focuses primarily on DMARC reporting and monitoring, providing essential tools to achieve DMARC compliance and protection. Its feature set is more streamlined, making it suitable for users who need clear, actionable insights into their DMARC data without an overwhelming amount of additional security tools.
The platform offers a straightforward approach to DMARC implementation and management. We observed that it simplifies the process of identifying email sending sources, analyzing DMARC reports, and moving domains towards a p=reject policy. It's built for efficiency in managing DMARC specifics.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Agari Brand Protection, given its extensive feature set, has a steeper learning curve. The interface is powerful but can be complex for new users or those without a dedicated security team. We found that navigating its many dashboards and configurations requires a good understanding of email security principles.
Setting up and configuring policies can be intricate, often requiring professional services or significant internal expertise. While the depth of control is impressive, it's not a 'set it and forget it' solution. Its user experience is geared towards security professionals who need granular control and comprehensive data.
DMARC 25 offers a more intuitive and user-friendly experience, particularly for those new to DMARC. The dashboard is clean and presents DMARC data in an easily digestible format. We found the process of onboarding and report analysis to be relatively straightforward, which is a significant plus.
The platform focuses on clarity, ensuring that users can quickly understand their DMARC compliance status and identify unauthorized senders. Its simplicity makes it accessible for a wider range of technical proficiencies. The user journey is designed to guide users efficiently through DMARC implementation steps.
Which product has the best support
Support
Agari Brand Protection provides enterprise-level support, which typically includes dedicated account managers and extensive technical assistance. Our interactions suggest that support is responsive for critical issues, but for routine queries, there can be some latency. The depth of their support aligns with the complexity of their offering.
Due to the specialized nature of the platform, support often involves detailed technical discussions. While comprehensive, the response times for non-urgent matters could be improved, according to some user feedback. However, for complex deployments, their expertise is invaluable.
DMARC 25 offers more accessible support channels, as expected from a more focused product. We found their support to be helpful for DMARC-specific questions, providing guidance on report interpretation and policy configuration. Their localized support for specific regions is also a notable advantage.
The support team is generally responsive and provides clear, concise answers to common DMARC challenges. While they might not have the same extensive global enterprise network as Agari, their dedicated focus on DMARC means their team is highly proficient in addressing related inquiries efficiently.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Agari Brand Protection is best suited for large enterprises and organizations with complex email infrastructures that require advanced threat protection alongside DMARC enforcement. It's ideal for those prioritizing robust security, brand reputation, and compliance across multiple digital channels.
It is also a strong contender for Managed Security Service Providers (MSPs) handling high-value enterprise clients who need a comprehensive security suite. For SMBs, its extensive features and associated cost might be an overkill. Its suitability lies in its capability to handle the most sophisticated email threats.
DMARC 25 is an excellent choice for SMBs and organizations primarily focused on achieving DMARC compliance and gaining clear visibility into their email ecosystem. It caters to those who need a dedicated, easy-to-use DMARC reporting solution without the added complexity of broader email security features.
For MSPs, DMARC 25 can be suitable for clients requiring a focused DMARC service, possibly as part of a layered security approach where other tools handle advanced threats. While it serves small to medium enterprises well, larger enterprises might find its DMARC-centric approach too narrow for their comprehensive security needs.
DMARC report analysis
Provides insights from DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Comprehensive, detailed analysis with advanced filtering.
Clear, concise analysis focused on core DMARC metrics.
Source detection
Identifies legitimate and fraudulent email sending sources.
Advanced detection across many channels, including non-email.
Effective detection for email sending sources.
Forward detection
Detects email forwarding scenarios.
Robust detection, often integrated with broader flow analysis.
Good detection for forwarded emails.
Spoof detection
Identifies email spoofing attempts.
Sophisticated, multi-layered spoofing detection.
Solid spoofing detection based on DMARC failures.
Notifications and alerts
Provides alerts for DMARC policy changes or threats.
Customizable alerts for various threat types.
Standard alerts for DMARC compliance and unauthorized sending.
Reporting
Generates various reports on email authentication and threats.
Extensive reporting, including threat intelligence and brand abuse.
Focused DMARC compliance and trend reports.
API
Offers an API for integration with other systems.
Yes, for extensive integration with security ecosystems.
Yes, for DMARC data integration.
Multi-tenancy
Supports managing multiple domains or clients from one interface.
Designed for multi-domain, enterprise environments.
Supports multiple domains.
SPF flattening
Helps manage SPF records to avoid the 10-lookup limit.
Yes, as part of comprehensive email authentication management.
Not a primary feature, usually manual outside tool.
Hosted DMARC
Provides hosted DMARC services.
Yes, integrated with their broader email security offering.
Yes, core offering.
BIMI
Supports Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).
Yes, as part of brand protection.
Yes, helps with BIMI implementation.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Supports MTA-STS and TLS-RPT for secure email transport.
Yes, as part of advanced email security.
Yes, supports these standards.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors IP blocklists (blacklists) and sender reputation.
Extensive monitoring for comprehensive threat intelligence.
Monitors blocklists and sender reputation.
AI copilot
Uses AI for assisted DMARC management.
Utilizes AI for threat detection and automation.
Not a stated feature.
DNS monitoring
Monitors DNS records for changes or misconfigurations.
Comprehensive DNS monitoring for security posture.
Monitors relevant DMARC-related DNS records.
Self hostable
Option to host the software on private infrastructure.
Cloud-based solution.
Cloud-based solution.
Free trial/free tier
Offers a free trial or a permanently free tier.
Requires direct contact for pricing.
Offers a one-month free trial.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Agari Brand Protection is a powerhouse for enterprise email security, but its complexity and potential cost might be a hurdle for organizations seeking a simpler DMARC solution. DMARC 25, while user-friendly and focused, might not offer the comprehensive security suite that larger, more targeted attacks necessitate, potentially requiring additional tools for full threat coverage. The trade-off between depth and simplicity is clear here.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
4 / 5(1)
0 / 5(0)
Descent Email Security
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Fortra DMARC Protection?
I am a new user of cloud email protection and I am extremely fond of the added security layer it offers to the users of office 365. Most amazing feature is the added notification whenever a suspicious mail is there. I have observed that the other folder segregation doesn't always work in the office 365 but here it works like magic.
What do you dislike about Fortra DMARC Protection?
The policies are a bit off to curate for an individual from a non tech background. And the support provided by the team are a little slow. Rest everything is up to the mark and I'll still continue to use it further.
What problems is Fortra DMARC Protection solving and how is that benefiting you?
It is enabling an added security layer to the emails with confidential content to make it a little better and secure for all the individuals within an organization.
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Pricing
Both Agari Brand Protection and DMARC 25 opt for a 'contact us for pricing' model, making direct cost comparisons challenging without engaging their sales teams.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with Agari Brand Protection or DMARC 25?
4 / 5(1)
