Summary
The prevailing opinion among email deliverability experts and marketers is that aligning the 5322.From domain with the DKIM (d=) domain is beneficial for optimal email delivery. This alignment facilitates DMARC compliance, enhances sender reputation, and mitigates spoofing risks. Some advocate for a direct match, while others deem DMARC alignment sufficient. Starting from a new infrastructure, a matching domain is advantageous; however, changes to existing, functional setups may not be necessary. It's generally recommended to minimize discrepancies between 5321, 5322, and d= domains. Finally, DMARC reporting is an important element in spotting failures in authentication.
Key findings
- DMARC Authentication: For messages to pass DMARC checks, either SPF or DKIM authentication is essential.
- Alignment Importance: Alignment of the 5322.From address with the DKIM (d=) or SPF domain is critical for DMARC to pass.
- Sender Authorization: Alignment serves as a verification that the sender has the authorization to transmit emails on behalf of the domain.
- Deliverability: Domain alignment contributes to improved email deliverability and sender reputation.
- Anti-Spoofing: Domain alignment helps prevent email spoofing and phishing attacks.
Key considerations
- Configuration Context: Domain alignment carries more importance for new email infrastructures as compared to established, well-performing setups.
- Strictness of Alignment: Both strict matching and DMARC-aligned matching provide an acceptable alternative.
- Potential Disruptions: Changing a functional existing configuration could potentially disrupt deliverability and requires cautious consideration.
- DMARC Monitoring: Utilizing DMARC reporting to monitor authentication outcomes and identify possible issues.
- User Perception: Modifications to the 5322.From domain, which serves as the email's 'face,' should be carefully evaluated due to its impact on end-users.
- Minimizing Discrepancies: Consider minimizing any discrepancies between 5321, 5322, and d= domains for simpler management.
What email marketers say
9 marketer opinions
The consensus among email marketers and deliverability experts is that aligning the 5322.From domain with the DKIM (d=) domain is a best practice for optimal email delivery. This alignment is crucial for passing DMARC checks, improving sender reputation, and preventing spoofing. While some advocate for strict matching, others suggest that relaxed alignment is sufficient. Changing a well-functioning setup may not be necessary, but for new infrastructures, matching domains is highly recommended. Minimizing discrepancies between 5321, 5322, and d= domains is generally advised, and DMARC reporting is essential for identifying authentication failures.
Key opinions
- DMARC Compliance: Domain alignment (matching 5322.From with d=) is critical for passing DMARC checks.
- Improved Deliverability: Alignment enhances sender reputation and increases the likelihood of emails reaching the inbox.
- Spoofing Prevention: Domain alignment helps prevent email spoofing and phishing attacks.
- Simplicity and Management: Matching domains simplifies email authentication management.
- Best Practice: Using domain alignment is one of the top recommended best practices.
Key considerations
- New vs. Existing Infrastructure: Matching domains is particularly important for new email infrastructures, but may not be necessary for existing setups that are already performing well.
- Relaxed vs. Strict Alignment: While strict matching is ideal, relaxed alignment may be sufficient in some cases.
- Impact of Changes: Changing a well-functioning configuration should be approached with caution to avoid unintended consequences on deliverability.
- DMARC Reporting: Implementing DMARC reporting is crucial for monitoring authentication results and identifying potential issues.
- User Experience: Switching the 5322.From domain should be carefully considered, as it is the "face" of the email and a touchpoint for the end-user.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Hippo notes that SPF and DKIM help prove the authenticity of your emails and improve delivery rates. However they didn't make a determination on matching.
18 Apr 2024 - Email Hippo
Marketer view
Email marketer from Reddit emphasizes the importance of domain alignment for DMARC compliance. They suggest that aligning the 5322.From domain with the DKIM domain is essential for improved deliverability.
12 Nov 2022 - Reddit
What the experts say
4 expert opinions
Experts generally agree that domain alignment, specifically having the 5322.From domain either match or be DMARC-aligned with the d= domain, is a good practice for email deliverability. However, there's also a strong suggestion against changing the 5322.From domain if it's already working well.
Key opinions
- Domain Alignment: Aligning the 5322.From and d= domains improves deliverability.
- DMARC Alignment: DMARC alignment is a key aspect of successful email authentication.
- DKIM Best Practices: Domain alignment is a recognized best practice for DKIM implementation.
- Stability: Avoid unnecessary changes to the 5322.From domain if current settings are effective.
Key considerations
- Alignment Method: Determine if identical matching or DMARC-aligned matching is more appropriate for the specific setup.
- Existing Configuration: Evaluate the performance of the current configuration before making any changes.
- Implementation Complexity: Consider the complexity of implementing domain alignment and ensure proper DKIM and DMARC setup.
- Impact of Change: Assess the potential impact of changing the 5322.From domain on email deliverability.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise (while the page doesn't explicitly state a name, it provides expert-level advice) advises about DKIM and DMARC implementation and aligns with the recommendation to keep domain alignment in mind as a best practice for DKIM.
25 Mar 2022 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests that the 5322.from domain should be either identical to or DMARC-aligned with the d= domain.
5 Apr 2024 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
Email deliverability is enhanced by 5322.from alignment with the DKIM domain, as verified by DMARC authentication standards. To pass DMARC checks, either SPF or DKIM must authenticate, and 5322.from address must align with the domains used for SPF or DKIM. Correct SPF records authorize sending servers, increasing deliverability. The 5322.From Domain needs to align with the DKIM domain to be considered a passing message for DMARC, reinforcing domain matching as a best practice.
Key findings
- DMARC Requirement: DMARC requires either SPF or DKIM authentication for messages to pass.
- 5322.from Alignment: The 5322.From address domain must align with either the SPF or DKIM domain for DMARC to pass.
- Authorized Sender: Alignment verifies that the sender is authorized to send mail on behalf of the domain.
- Best Practice: Alignment of 5322.From with DKIM is considered a best practice to pass DMARC and ensure deliverability.
Key considerations
- RFC Standard: Understand the syntax and semantics of the 'From:' header field as defined by RFC 5322.
- SPF Setup: Properly configure SPF records to authorize sending servers.
- Authentication Reliance: Rely on both SPF and DKIM for robust email authentication.
- Domain Reputation: Monitor and maintain the domain's reputation to ensure ongoing deliverability.
Technical article
Documentation from AuthSMTP focuses on setting up SPF records to authorize sending servers. While it does not address domain matching directly, it implies that proper SPF configuration is crucial for deliverability, which is related to the alignment concept.
15 Aug 2024 - AuthSMTP
Technical article
Documentation from DKIMProxy.org explains that the 5322.From Domain needs to align with DKIM domain to be considered a passing message for DMARC. This suggests it is best practice for the domains to match for best delivery.
14 Nov 2024 - DKIMProxy.org
How do SPF, DKIM, and DMARC email authentication standards work?
How does DMARC impact email deliverability, and what are the pros and cons of using it?
Should SPF records match the 'From:' address or the Return-Path domain when sending from Marketo?
What are common terms for the envelope.from domain in email marketing?
What are the differences between 5321.from and 5322.from in email headers?
What SPF, DKIM, and DMARC settings are needed for Klaviyo and BigCommerce transactional emails?
