Summary
The general consensus from email marketers, experts, and DMARC documentation is that a 'reject' policy in DMARC does **not** require the 'From' and 'Return-Path' headers to be strictly aligned. Instead, the critical requirement is that either SPF or DKIM authentication methods align with the domain presented in the 'From' header. This alignment validates the sender's authorization to use the 'From' domain, even if the underlying infrastructure uses a different domain for the 'Return-Path'. Emails that fail to meet the SPF or DKIM alignment criteria, will be rejected by recipient mail servers when the 'reject' policy is enforced.
Key findings
- No Strict 'From'/'Return-Path' Alignment Required: DMARC's 'reject' policy doesn't mandate that the 'From' and 'Return-Path' domains must be identical.
- SPF or DKIM Alignment is Crucial: Passing DMARC depends on the successful alignment of either SPF or DKIM authentication with the domain found in the 'From' header.
- 'Reject' Policy Enforces Authentication: With a 'reject' policy, emails failing the DMARC authentication check (SPF or DKIM alignment failure) should be rejected by the recipient's mail server.
Key considerations
- Proper SPF/DKIM Configuration: Ensure that either SPF or DKIM is correctly configured and aligns with your 'From' domain to comply with DMARC.
- DMARC Policy Implementation: Understanding the impact of the 'reject' policy is essential for managing email deliverability and sender reputation.
- DMARC Monitoring and Reporting: Utilize DMARC reporting to monitor authentication results and identify any configuration or alignment issues that could affect email delivery.
What email marketers say
8 marketer opinions
The consensus among email marketers and experts is that a DMARC 'reject' policy does not mandate a strict alignment between the 'From' and 'Return-Path' headers. Instead, it requires that either SPF or DKIM authentication mechanisms align with the domain presented in the 'From' header. This ensures that emails failing DMARC checks due to authentication failures are rejected, while still allowing legitimate emails to pass even if the 'From' and 'Return-Path' domains differ, provided they are properly authenticated.
Key opinions
- Alignment Focus: DMARC 'reject' primarily focuses on the alignment of authentication methods (SPF or DKIM) with the 'From' domain, rather than direct alignment between 'From' and 'Return-Path'.
- Authentication Prerequisite: For an email to pass DMARC with a 'reject' policy, either SPF or DKIM must authenticate and align with the 'From' domain.
- Rejection on Failure: Emails failing both SPF and DKIM alignment checks are intended to be rejected by receiving mail servers when the DMARC policy is set to 'reject'.
Key considerations
- Authentication Method: Ensure that either SPF or DKIM is properly configured and aligned with the 'From' domain to pass DMARC, regardless of the 'Return-Path'.
- DMARC Policy Impact: Understand that the 'reject' policy tells receiving servers to reject unauthenticated emails, improving domain security and deliverability.
- Monitoring and Reporting: Implement DMARC reporting to monitor authentication results and identify any issues with SPF or DKIM alignment.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Mailhardener Blog explains that when DMARC policy is set to reject, it means that emails failing DMARC checks should be rejected by the recipient's mail server. However, this doesn't inherently mandate that 'From' and 'Return-Path' must be aligned, but it's crucial that either SPF or DKIM aligns for DMARC to pass.
8 Dec 2024 - Mailhardener Blog
Marketer view
Email marketer from Reddit explains that the reject policy in DMARC tells receiving mail servers to reject messages that fail DMARC checks. While alignment between the 'From' header and 'Return-Path' isn't explicitly enforced, it's implied because either SPF or DKIM needs to pass and align with the 'From' domain for a message to be considered legitimate.
2 Jul 2021 - Reddit
What the experts say
3 expert opinions
Experts agree that a DMARC 'reject' policy doesn't necessitate a direct match between the 'From' and 'Return-Path' headers. The core requirement is that either SPF or DKIM authentication aligns with the 'From' domain. This alignment verifies that the sender is authorized to use the 'From' domain, even if the 'Return-Path' differs, as long as the authentication passes.
Key opinions
- Authentication Alignment is Key: DMARC relies on SPF or DKIM alignment with the 'From' domain for validation.
- Flexible Header Requirements: Strict matching of 'From' and 'Return-Path' is not a mandatory condition for passing DMARC.
- Authorization Verification: Alignment of SPF or DKIM with the 'From' domain serves to verify the sender's authorization.
Key considerations
- Ensure SPF/DKIM Alignment: Properly configure SPF or DKIM so that one of these methods aligns with your 'From' domain.
- Understand DMARC Rejection Impact: Emails that fail both SPF and DKIM alignment will be rejected by receiving servers under a 'reject' policy.
- Monitor DMARC Reports: Regularly review DMARC reports to ensure proper authentication and alignment and to identify any potential issues.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that either SPF or DKIM must align (and pass) for DMARC to pass.
26 Jul 2021 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that DMARC policies (including 'reject') do not require that the 'From' and 'Return-Path' domains match exactly. The key requirement is that the email passes either SPF or DKIM authentication and that the authenticating domain aligns with the domain presented in the 'From' address. This ensures that the sender is authorized to use the 'From' domain, even if the underlying infrastructure uses a different domain for the 'Return-Path'.
31 Dec 2021 - Spam Resource
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
DMARC documentation from various sources consistently indicates that while a 'reject' policy increases the stringency of DMARC enforcement, it doesn't mandate a direct match between the 'From' and 'Return-Path' domains. Instead, DMARC relies on the alignment of either SPF or DKIM with the 'From' domain. For DMARC to pass, at least one of these authentication methods must successfully validate and align with the 'From' domain, allowing flexibility in the 'Return-Path' as long as authentication is solid.
Key findings
- Authentication Alignment: DMARC's primary requirement is the alignment of either SPF or DKIM with the 'From' domain, rather than strict 'From' and 'Return-Path' alignment.
- Flexible 'Return-Path': The 'Return-Path' domain doesn't necessarily need to match the 'From' domain, as long as SPF or DKIM authenticates and aligns.
- DMARC Policy Impact: The 'reject' policy dictates how receiving mail servers should handle messages that fail DMARC validation, typically by rejecting them.
Key considerations
- Proper Authentication Setup: Ensure that either SPF or DKIM is correctly configured and aligned with the 'From' domain to achieve DMARC compliance.
- DMARC Monitoring: Regularly monitor DMARC reports to verify proper alignment and authentication, and to identify and address any potential issues.
- SPF for DMARC: When using SPF for DMARC validation, ensure that the 'From' domain aligns with the domain used to authenticate with SPF (the domain in the 'Return-Path').
Technical article
Documentation from Valimail explain that one of the requirements for DMARC is to meet either SPF or DKIM alignment. The From and Return-Path do not need to be aligned, only one of the authentication methods.
17 Jan 2024 - Valimail
Technical article
Documentation from DMARC.org details that for DMARC to pass based on SPF, the 'From' domain and the domain used to authenticate with SPF (i.e., the domain in the 'Return-Path') must align. Alignment can be strict or relaxed depending on the configuration but is necessary for SPF to be a valid authenticator under DMARC.
22 Feb 2022 - DMARC.org
Can DMARC reports be sent without RUA or RUF addresses?
Does BIMI require strict alignment between From and return-path domains?
How do DMARC policies and RUA/RUF settings inherit or override each other between a domain and its subdomains?
How do SPF, DKIM, and DMARC email authentication standards work?
How do SPF records and DKIM keys work with multiple email services like Klaviyo and Shopify?
What DMARC policy settings are required for BIMI and how do I determine the best setting for sp=?
