Summary
The reliability of ReturnPath's inbox rate is questionable, and its correlation with open rates is often weak due to various factors. Third-party reports inherently vary in accuracy, and discrepancies arise from ISP weighting differences between ReturnPath's data and the sender's list. Seed list testing, used by ReturnPath, provides a limited snapshot, failing to account for variations across all mailbox providers and user engagement levels. Sender reputation, spam traps, blacklists, and authentication issues significantly influence inbox placement. Even with successful inbox placement, factors like subject line relevance, preheader text, and sender recognition affect open rates. User engagement, varying spam filter algorithms across ISPs, high spam complaint rates, and the impact of feedback loops further contribute to inconsistencies. A comprehensive deliverability strategy requires holistic monitoring beyond ReturnPath metrics, focusing on content quality, list hygiene, and authentication.
Key findings
- Third-Party Report Variance: Third-party inbox rate reports exhibit inherent unreliability.
- ISP Weighting Discrepancies: Differences in ISP weighting between ReturnPath and sender's list skew results.
- Seed List Limitations: Seed list testing offers a limited view, neglecting variations across providers and engagement.
- Reputation and Authentication: Sender reputation, spam traps, and authentication heavily influence inbox placement.
- Content and Engagement Impact: Content relevance, preheader text, and sender recognition affect open rates.
- Spam Complaints and Feedback Loops: High spam complaint rates and feedback loops suppress open rates despite inbox placement.
- Diverse Filtering Algorithms: Varying spam filter algorithms across ISPs contribute to deliverability inconsistencies.
Key considerations
- Holistic Deliverability View: Adopt a holistic strategy beyond ReturnPath metrics, incorporating diverse factors.
- ISP Alignment: Align email list's ISP distribution with ReturnPath's weighting for greater accuracy.
- User Engagement Focus: Prioritize user engagement to improve inbox placement and open rates.
- Authentication Best Practices: Implement strong authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) for better sender reputation.
- List Hygiene Maintenance: Maintain meticulous list hygiene to prevent spam traps and maintain a positive sending reputation.
- Content Optimization: Craft relevant, engaging content and subject lines to maximize open rates.
- Monitor Feedback: Monitor feedback loops and complaint rates to address deliverability issues proactively.
What email marketers say
11 marketer opinions
Several factors contribute to the unreliability of ReturnPath's inbox rate and its potential lack of correlation with open rates. Third-party inbox rate reports can vary in accuracy. ISP weighting differences between ReturnPath's data and the sender's list, consistent engagement from a subset of recipients, and the limitations of seed list testing can skew results. Sender reputation, spam traps, blacklists, and authentication issues also play a crucial role. Even with successful inbox placement, factors like subject line relevance and user engagement impact open rates. The varying spam filter algorithms across ISPs and the limited scope of seed lists further contribute to inconsistencies.
Key opinions
- Third-Party Unreliability: Third-party inbox rate reports are inherently unreliable to varying degrees.
- ISP Weighting Discrepancies: Differences in ISP weighting between ReturnPath's data and the sender's list can skew metrics.
- Consistent Engagement: A consistently engaged subset of recipients may bias inbox placement results.
- Seed List Limitations: Seed list testing provides a limited snapshot and doesn't account for variations across all mailbox providers or user engagement.
- Sender Reputation Impact: Poor sender reputation and authentication issues can lead to inaccurate inbox rate calculations.
- Content and Engagement: Even with inbox placement, factors like subject line relevance and user engagement directly affect open rates.
- Algorithm Variance: Different ISPs use varying spam filter algorithms, leading to inconsistencies in inbox placement.
Key considerations
- Holistic Deliverability: Relying solely on ReturnPath's inbox rate can be misleading; consider a more holistic view of deliverability.
- ISP Alignment: Ensure your email list's ISP distribution aligns with ReturnPath's weighting to improve accuracy.
- Engagement Focus: Prioritize strategies to improve overall user engagement, as it influences inbox placement and open rates.
- Authentication: Maintain a strong sender reputation by ensuring proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC).
- List Hygiene: Implement rigorous list hygiene practices to avoid spam traps and maintain a clean sending reputation.
- Content Quality: Focus on crafting relevant, engaging content and subject lines to improve open rates.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Mailjet explains that factors like spam traps, blacklists, and authentication issues can affect email deliverability, leading to discrepancies between Return Path's reported inbox rates and actual open rates due to bad sending practices.
3 Jun 2022 - Mailjet
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks suggests that if ISP weighting is different than what ReturnPath is using, it could skew the metrics. If an ISP is heavily represented in the ReturnPath list, but you have almost none of that ISP in your list, that could certainly skew the metrics in this fashion.
11 May 2025 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
3 expert opinions
Experts emphasize that ReturnPath's inbox rate, based on seed list data, offers a limited view of overall deliverability and may not correlate with open rates due to several factors. Content quality, sender authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and list hygiene significantly influence inbox placement beyond ReturnPath metrics. Additionally, high complaint rates can negatively impact deliverability, even with positive seed-based testing results. The diverse range of mailbox providers and filtering technologies that real users encounter also contributes to the discrepancy.
Key opinions
- Beyond ReturnPath Metrics: Factors such as content quality, sender authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and list hygiene significantly influence inbox placement and thus open rates, independent of ReturnPath's metrics.
- Impact of Complaint Rates: High complaint rates can negatively impact deliverability and open rates, even when ReturnPath's seed-based testing suggests good inbox placement.
- Limited Seed List View: Seed list data provides a limited view of overall deliverability and doesn't account for the diverse landscape of mailbox providers and filtering technologies.
Key considerations
- Holistic Deliverability Strategy: Develop a holistic deliverability strategy that encompasses content quality, authentication, list hygiene, and monitoring complaint rates.
- Monitor Feedback Loops: Actively monitor feedback loops and promptly address any complaints to maintain a good sender reputation.
- Diverse Testing Methods: Supplement seed list testing with other methods to gain a more comprehensive understanding of deliverability across various mailbox providers and user engagement levels.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that factors beyond Return Path metrics like content quality, sender authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), and list hygiene significantly influence inbox placement, leading to discrepancies between reported inbox rates and actual open rates.
17 Apr 2022 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that seed list data, like that used by Return Path, provides a limited view of overall deliverability because it doesn't account for the diverse range of mailbox providers and filtering technologies that real users encounter.
24 Feb 2025 - Spam Resource
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
Documentation sources explain that Return Path (Validity) and SparkPost use seed list monitoring to provide insights into inbox placement and deliverability by tracking where mail lands (inbox, spam, or missing) at specific mailbox providers. However, even with good inbox placement as indicated by seed lists, factors like high spam complaint rates (Google) and sender reputation (Microsoft) can significantly suppress open rates due to filtering and junking of emails.
Key findings
- Seed List Monitoring: Return Path/Validity and SparkPost utilize seed list monitoring to assess mail stream performance at specific mailbox providers.
- Inbox Placement Insights: Seed data reflects whether mail lands in the inbox, spam folder, or is missing altogether.
- Spam Complaint Impact: High spam complaint rates can suppress open rates, even with good inbox placement.
- Sender Reputation Influence: Sender reputation is a key factor, influencing whether emails are delivered to the inbox or junk folder, thereby affecting open rates.
Key considerations
- Comprehensive Monitoring: Combine seed list monitoring with other deliverability metrics to gain a more complete picture.
- Manage Complaint Rates: Actively manage and reduce spam complaint rates to ensure emails reach the inbox and are opened.
- Reputation Management: Prioritize building and maintaining a positive sender reputation to improve inbox placement and open rates.
- Deliverability Diagnosis: Use the information from Return Path and other sources to diagnose deliverability issues, such as spam filtering or missing mail.
Technical article
Documentation from SparkPost explains Seed list monitoring is a method for monitoring inbox placement and deliverability, by sending to a list of seed addresses and tracking placement.
7 Dec 2022 - SparkPost
Technical article
Documentation from Validity Support explains that Return Path provides data on inbox placement, spam filtering, and missing mail to help diagnose deliverability issues. It monitors how mailbox providers handle your mail.
10 Feb 2022 - Validity Support
How accurate are email spam testing tools and what are the alternatives?
How accurate are seed lists for email deliverability testing?
How accurate are seedlists in deliverability platforms like Everest and Glockapps?
How can you deduce inbox placement metrics using per-ISP open rates and manage bot opens?
How reliable are GlockApps deliverability placement reports and what are the alternatives?
What are the best alternatives to Validity for email certification and deliverability data?
