Maintaining consistent email volume is crucial for establishing and maintaining a positive sender reputation. While volume itself doesn't directly impact reputation, inconsistencies and sudden fluctuations, especially when starting out or during IP warming, can cause deliverability issues as they may be perceived as suspicious activity. Gradual and controlled volume increases are recommended. High spam complaint rates, even with low percentages, can significantly damage reputation at high volumes. Maintaining good list hygiene, proper segmentation, adhering to sending limits, and focusing on sending wanted emails to encourage engagement are all important factors.
8 marketer opinions
Maintaining consistent email volume is crucial for building a positive sender reputation. Sudden spikes or drops in volume, especially when starting, can be perceived as suspicious activity and lead to deliverability issues. Proper list hygiene, segmentation, and adherence to sending limits are essential, particularly at high volumes, to minimize spam complaints and maintain engagement. Gradual increases in volume are recommended to establish trust with ISPs.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Litmus states that maintaining good list hygiene is critical, especially at high volumes. Sending to invalid or unengaged addresses increases bounce rates and spam complaints, damaging your sender reputation.
21 Nov 2024 - Litmus
Marketer view
Email marketer from SendPulse shares that maintaining a consistent sending volume builds trust with mailbox providers. This predictability helps them identify you as a legitimate sender, positively impacting your reputation.
21 Jan 2024 - SendPulse
5 expert opinions
While volume itself doesn't directly impact reputation, inconsistencies and fluctuations, especially when starting out, can cause deliverability issues. A predictable sending volume is crucial for maintaining a good sender reputation, and large fluctuations can trigger spam filters. Sudden spikes can be seen as signs of compromised accounts. Gradual and controlled volume increases, especially during IP warming, are important.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that volume doesn’t directly affect reputation or deliverability. Poor reputation develops because people don’t like the emails and interact with them negatively, signaling to machine learning filters that the mail is unwanted.
15 Feb 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks shares notes from 4 hours of talks on reputation, providing a link to a Google document that contains the call from last night and links back to the previous 3 calls. Calls 1 and 2 covered theory, while 3 and 4 focused on monitoring and development.
30 Jun 2024 - Email Geeks
4 technical articles
Email sending best practices emphasize the importance of gradual volume increases to establish a positive sender reputation. Sudden volume increases can trigger spam filters and damage reputation, especially when combined with high spam complaint rates. Incremental increases during IP warming are crucial for demonstrating consistent and legitimate email practices to ISPs.
Technical article
Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools shares that keeping spam rates low is crucial, especially with high email volume. Even a small percentage of spam complaints can significantly damage sender reputation when sending a large number of emails.
11 Jun 2024 - Google Postmaster Tools
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft responds that sudden increases in email volume can trigger spam filters. Gradual increases are recommended to maintain a positive sender reputation.
22 Feb 2025 - Microsoft
Can an email sender's reputation be permanently damaged by repeated cycles of massive sends and pauses?
Do soft bounces affect email deliverability and sender reputation?
Does decreased weekend volume on a dedicated IP affect deliverability?
Does shifting email volume between IPs affect deliverability and IP reputation across different mailbox providers?
How accurate is SNDS and Google Postmaster Tools reputation data?
How do DMARC, spam complaints, and IP reputation affect email deliverability and rejections?
How do ESPs manage IP pools and how does it affect deliverability?