Summary
ESPs manage IP pools to optimize deliverability, employing strategies like segmenting senders based on reputation and risk. Some ESPs automate this, while others do it manually. Your reputation in a shared IP pool is affected by the worst sender, highlighting the importance of careful selection of ESP and sending practices. Domain reputation is increasingly important, impacting the ROI of dedicated IPs, especially with consumer ISPs. IP warming is critical for establishing a positive sender reputation. Dedicated IPs offer more control but aren't always necessary for lower-volume senders. Maintaining clean lists, using feedback loops, and monitoring IP reputation are crucial for preventing blacklisting. SPF and other authentication methods help verify sender identity. Good IP practices are a key component of overall deliverability.
Key findings
- Segmentation Importance: ESPs segment IP pools based on sender reputation, affecting deliverability.
- Shared IP Risks: Shared IP pools are vulnerable to the negative impact of poorly-behaved senders.
- Domain Reputation Ascendance: Domain reputation is becoming more significant than IP reputation.
- IP Warming Necessity: IP warming is crucial for establishing a good sender reputation.
- Dedicated IP Tradeoffs: Dedicated IPs offer control but aren't always cost-effective.
- Holistic Deliverability: Deliverability requires a mix of good IP practices, list hygiene, and authentication.
Key considerations
- ESP Choice: Carefully choose an ESP that aligns with your sending volume and deliverability needs.
- Reputation Management: Prioritize building and maintaining a positive sender reputation.
- Dedicated IP Evaluation: Evaluate whether a dedicated IP is necessary based on volume and reputation goals.
- Authentication Implementation: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC authentication to improve deliverability.
- Proactive Monitoring: Proactively monitor IP reputation and deliverability metrics.
- List Hygiene Practices: Implement regular list cleaning to remove invalid or inactive email addresses.
- Feedback Loop Utilization: Utilize feedback loops to promptly address spam complaints.
What email marketers say
13 marketer opinions
ESPs manage IP pools through various strategies to optimize email deliverability. Segmentation based on sender reputation is common, where senders with good reputations are grouped together to improve overall deliverability. Shared IP pools are affected by the sending practices of all users, meaning a single sender with poor engagement or spam-like activity can negatively impact everyone else. Warming up IP pools gradually is crucial for establishing a positive reputation. Dedicated IPs offer more control but may not be suitable for lower-volume senders. Maintaining clean email lists, monitoring IP reputation, and using feedback loops are vital for preventing blacklisting and ensuring good deliverability. Sender reputation is a key factor, as IP address blacklists are widely shared.
Key opinions
- Segmentation: ESPs often segment IP pools based on sender reputation to improve deliverability.
- Shared IP Risks: Shared IP pools are vulnerable to the negative impact of senders with poor practices.
- IP Warmup: Gradual IP warming is essential for establishing a positive sender reputation and avoiding spam filters.
- Dedicated IP Control: Dedicated IPs offer greater control over reputation but may not be suitable for all senders.
- Reputation Monitoring: Proactive monitoring of IP reputation is crucial for identifying and addressing deliverability issues.
- Feedback Loops: Feedback loops help manage IP reputation by providing insights into spam complaints.
- List Hygiene: Maintaining a clean and engaged email list is essential for improving sender reputation and deliverability.
Key considerations
- Shared vs. Dedicated IPs: Evaluate whether a shared or dedicated IP is more suitable based on sending volume and desired control over reputation.
- Sending Practices: Adhere to best practices for email sending to avoid negatively impacting IP reputation and deliverability.
- Reputation Monitoring Tools: Utilize available tools for monitoring IP reputation and addressing issues promptly.
- List Maintenance: Regularly clean and maintain email lists to remove inactive or invalid addresses.
- Feedback Loop Implementation: Implement feedback loops to identify and remove subscribers who mark emails as spam.
- IP Warmup Strategy: Develop a gradual IP warming strategy when introducing new IPs to establish a positive reputation.
- Impact of Others: Be aware of how the sending behavior of other users on shared IP pools can affect your deliverability.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Validity explains that feedback loops are an important part of IP reputation management. Feedback loops allow the sender to know what is reported as spam and to be removed from the list to prevent it from being a spam email.
10 Sep 2024 - Validity
Marketer view
Email marketer from SparkPost explains that warming up an IP is important to build sender reputation for the IPs. Without warmup, emails are more likely to go to spam.
25 Oct 2022 - SparkPost
What the experts say
6 expert opinions
ESPs manage IP pools using various techniques, including segmenting clients based on risk and reputation. While some ESPs automate the process, others handle it manually, and some may not segment at all. Domain reputation is gaining importance over IP reputation, making dedicated IPs less cost-effective for some. IP segmentation, such as creating pools for new customers, is a common strategy. 'Pool tuning' aims to optimize delivery for well-behaving clients, moving away from blending good and bad senders. Sender reputation heavily influences deliverability, leading ESPs to monitor behavior and segregate pools. Proactive monitoring of IP reputation is essential for addressing issues early on.
Key opinions
- Segmentation Variability: ESPs vary in their approach to IP pool management, with different levels of automation and segmentation.
- Domain Reputation: Domain reputation is increasingly important, potentially diminishing the value of dedicated IPs.
- Strategic Segmentation: IP segmentation strategies, like pools for new customers, remain relevant.
- Pool Tuning Focus: Pool tuning now emphasizes maximizing delivery for good senders, not accommodating poor senders.
- Reputation Impact: Sender reputation strongly affects deliverability in shared IP pools.
- Proactive Monitoring: Proactive IP reputation monitoring is crucial for early issue detection.
Key considerations
- Segmentation Strategy: Consider the ESP's segmentation strategy and how it aligns with your sending practices.
- Reputation Management: Prioritize building and maintaining a positive sender reputation to improve deliverability.
- Monitoring Tools: Utilize provided tools and resources to proactively monitor IP reputation.
- ROI of Dedicated IPs: Evaluate the ROI of dedicated IPs in light of the increasing importance of domain reputation.
- Modern Pool Strategies: Focus on modern pool strategies like new sender pools, rather than outdated approaches like gold/silver/bronze tiers.
- Adaptability: Be prepared to adapt to changes in ESP policies and deliverability best practices.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks shares that domain reputation is often more important than IP reputation for consumer ISPs, making dedicated IPs less ROI-positive for many ESPs.
15 Mar 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that proactive monitoring of IP reputation is essential for identifying and addressing deliverability issues early on. ESPs often provide tools and resources to help senders track their IP reputation and identify potential problems.
3 Jul 2021 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
Email Service Providers (ESPs) manage IP pools, and this management significantly impacts deliverability. Dedicated IP addresses provide senders with control over their reputation, enabling them to build a positive reputation through consistent, high-quality email practices. Conversely, poor sending practices can harm deliverability. Maintaining a good sender reputation is critical for reaching the inbox, with factors like IP reputation and spam complaints playing a key role in filtering decisions made by providers like Google and Microsoft. Utilizing Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for email authentication is important to prevent spoofing and enhance IP reputation by verifying the email's origin.
Key findings
- Dedicated IP Control: Dedicated IPs allow senders direct control over their sender reputation.
- Sender Reputation Importance: Maintaining a good sender reputation is crucial for inbox placement.
- Filtering Factors: ISPs use factors like IP reputation and spam complaints to filter emails.
- SPF Authentication: SPF authentication helps prevent spoofing and improve IP reputation.
Key considerations
- Quality Sending Practices: Adopt consistent, high-quality sending practices to build a positive sender reputation.
- Reputation Monitoring: Monitor your sender reputation to identify and address deliverability issues.
- SPF Implementation: Implement SPF and other authentication methods to verify your email's origin.
- Spam Complaint Management: Minimize spam complaints through proper list management and relevant content.
Technical article
Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools emphasizes that maintaining a good sender reputation is crucial for deliverability. Google uses various factors, including IP reputation and spam complaints, to determine whether to deliver emails to the inbox or spam folder. Monitoring and addressing deliverability issues is recommended.
25 Jan 2023 - Google Postmaster Tools
Technical article
Documentation from Amazon SES explains that dedicated IP addresses allow senders to control their reputation. By consistently sending high-quality email, they can build a positive reputation and improve deliverability. Conversely, poor sending practices can negatively impact deliverability.
8 Mar 2022 - Amazon SES Documentation
Are IP warming services effective for improving email deliverability?
Do ESPs charge for dedicated IPs and how much do dedicated IPs cost?
How are delist requests processed and spam detected, and why might legitimate inquiries be overlooked?
How can ESPs identify and block spammers before they damage IP reputation?
How can I check if an email is sent from a dedicated or shared IP without contacting the ESP?
How do ActiveCampaign and other ESPs handle DMARC records during custom return-path setup, and what are the potential issues?
How do shared IP pools and sending domains impact email sender reputation for ESPs?
What are the best practices and schedules for warming up an IP address for email sending?
What is a shared IP address and how does it affect email deliverability?
