Suped

Do all email service providers support DMARC, and what does 'support' mean in this context?

Summary

While email service providers (ESPs) don't directly manage DMARC settings within their platforms, the general consensus is that they play a crucial role in supporting DMARC compliance. DMARC is implemented at the domain level via DNS records. ESPs offer tools and guidance to help users properly set up SPF and DKIM authentication, which are essential for DMARC. Furthermore, ESPs also need to provide the infrastructure to support DMARC alignment. The level of 'support' from receiving mail servers varies: some, like Gmail and Microsoft Exchange Online, honor DMARC policies by acting on messages that fail authentication, while the DMARC standard doesn't mandate any specific actions for receivers. Adoption is more widespread among larger senders, and smaller organizations often face resource constraints in managing DMARC complexities.

Key findings

  • DMARC Implementation Location: DMARC is implemented at the domain level, not within the ESP interface.
  • ESP Support Role: ESPs support DMARC through SPF/DKIM guidance, alignment support, and related tools.
  • Receiver Handling Variation: Mailbox providers differ in their DMARC compliance and actions taken on failing messages.
  • SPF/DKIM Requirement: DMARC relies on properly configured SPF and DKIM for authentication to function correctly.
  • Adoption Rate Disparity: Larger senders are more likely to have implemented DMARC than smaller senders.
  • Standard Mandates: The DMARC standard does not require receiving servers to do anything with DMARC records.

Key considerations

  • Domain Access Necessity: Access to your domain's DNS records is required to implement DMARC.
  • SPF/DKIM Configuration: Ensure SPF and DKIM are correctly configured with your ESP before setting up DMARC.
  • Monitoring Implementation: Implement DMARC monitoring to track authentication results and identify potential issues and misconfigurations.
  • Receiver Behavior Awareness: Understand that different mailbox providers might handle DMARC failures in different ways.
  • Resource Allocation: Allocate sufficient resources for managing and troubleshooting DMARC, particularly for smaller organizations.
  • ESP Alignment: Ensure that your ESP provides the necessary infrastructure to support DMARC alignment.

What email marketers say

8 marketer opinions

The consensus is that ESPs (Email Service Providers) don't directly 'support' DMARC in the sense of enabling it within their platform. DMARC is a domain-level setting that users configure through their domain registrar or DNS provider. ESPs typically provide tools and guidance to help users properly authenticate their emails with SPF and DKIM, which are prerequisites for DMARC. Mailbox providers (like Gmail, Yahoo) have varying levels of DMARC compliance, influencing how they handle emails that fail DMARC checks.

Key opinions

  • DMARC Location: DMARC is configured at the domain level, not directly within the ESP.
  • ESP Role: ESPs facilitate DMARC compliance by providing SPF and DKIM authentication tools.
  • Mailbox Provider Variation: Mailbox providers differ in how they handle emails failing DMARC checks.
  • SPF/DKIM Importance: DMARC relies on SPF and DKIM for authentication.

Key considerations

  • Domain Registrar Access: You'll need access to your domain registrar or DNS provider to set up a DMARC record.
  • SPF & DKIM Setup: Ensure SPF and DKIM are properly configured with your ESP before implementing DMARC.
  • Monitoring: Use DMARC reporting to monitor authentication results and identify potential issues.
  • Mailbox Provider Behavior: Understand that different mailbox providers might treat DMARC failures differently.

Marketer view

Email marketer from AuthSMTP explains that While AuthSMTP can't directly manage your DMARC settings, they can help ensure your emails are properly authenticated with SPF and DKIM, which are essential for DMARC compliance.

9 Apr 2023 - AuthSMTP

Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks explains that ESPs like Mailchimp don't need to 'support' DMARC in the same way a domain owner implements it. It depends on what "support" means - whether it's dashboards for aggregated DMARC reports. Also notes that mailbox providers like Gmail and Yahoo have varying levels of DMARC support, with some treating all failures as 'p=quarantine' and others ignoring the record entirely.

25 Mar 2025 - Email Geeks

What the experts say

4 expert opinions

Experts highlight different aspects of DMARC 'support'. ESPs need to support alignment, which is crucial for sending infrastructure. Receivers 'support' varies, encompassing report sending, honoring handling requests for failing mail, and adherence to authorization standards. DMARC places no obligation on receivers. Large senders have generally implemented DMARC, but adoption lags among smaller senders, reinforcing the need for ESP support. ESPs offer guidance and tools for SPF and DKIM (prerequisites for DMARC), but resource limitations can hinder issue resolution.

Key opinions

  • ESP Alignment Support: ESPs must support DMARC alignment for sending infrastructure.
  • Receiver Support Variance: Receivers exhibit varying levels of 'support,' including report sending and policy enforcement, but are not obligated.
  • Adoption Disparity: DMARC adoption is higher among large senders compared to smaller ones.
  • Resource Constraints: Limited internal resources can impede the resolution of DMARC configuration issues.
  • SPF/DKIM prerequisites: ESPs often offer tools and guidance for SPF and DKIM, which are necessary for DMARC

Key considerations

  • Assess ESP Alignment Capabilities: Evaluate your ESP's DMARC alignment support for sending practices.
  • Receiver Policy Awareness: Understand that email receivers may handle DMARC failures differently.
  • Address Adoption Gap: Smaller senders should prioritize DMARC implementation.
  • Internal Expertise: Ensure sufficient resources are available to manage and resolve DMARC-related issues.

Expert view

Expert from Email Geeks specifies that receiver 'support' can mean different things: sending reports, respecting requests for handling failing mail, and following report authorization standards - and not all do these things. Also that The DMARC standard itself does not put any obligation on the receiving side.

6 Jan 2022 - Email Geeks

Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise explains that large senders have generally implemented DMARC, but smaller senders still lag behind, therefore ESP's need to support it.

19 Nov 2024 - Word to the Wise

What the documentation says

3 technical articles

The DMARC standard itself does not *require* receiving mail servers to take any specific actions based on DMARC records. However, major mailbox providers like Gmail and Microsoft Exchange Online do respect DMARC policies. Gmail handles messages that fail DMARC checks according to the policy set in the sender's DMARC record. Microsoft Exchange Online honors the sender's DMARC policy when receiving mail; a passing DMARC check signifies a legitimate sender.

Key findings

  • DMARC Standard's Scope: DMARC standard does not mandate receivers' actions.
  • Gmail Adherence: Gmail uses the DMARC policy for handling messages that fail authentication.
  • Microsoft's Implementation: Exchange Online honors DMARC policies, recognizing passing checks as legitimacy.

Key considerations

  • Reliance on Provider Implementation: While DMARC sets the policy, its enforcement depends on the receiver's implementation.
  • Policy Setting Importance: Correctly configure your DMARC policy, as Gmail and other providers will use it to handle failing messages.
  • Authentication Impact: Successful DMARC authentication builds sender legitimacy, as recognized by Microsoft Exchange Online.

Technical article

Documentation from Microsoft explains that Exchange Online honors the DMARC policy of the sender's domain when it receives mail. A DMARC check result of Pass lets Exchange Online know that the message passed authentication and that the sender's organization can be considered legitimate.

5 Feb 2025 - Microsoft

Technical article

Documentation from Google Workspace explains that If a message fails DMARC authentication checks, Gmail handles the message according to the policy you set in your DMARC record.

23 Feb 2024 - Google Workspace Admin Help

Start improving your email deliverability today

Sign up