Summary
The termination of email deliverability services by clients, even after receiving improvement recommendations, stems from a confluence of factors. Clients often hold unrealistic expectations, viewing deliverability as a simple 'one-time fix' requiring a 'magic button' solution rather than an ongoing, complex process. They may become impatient with the continuous effort required, underestimate the depth of necessary technical adjustments, or prefer to avoid the 'bitter pill' of unwinding long-standing bad practices. Furthermore, internal resource limitations, budget constraints, competing business priorities, and a lack of commitment to implementing changes significantly contribute to disengagement. Sometimes, clients mistakenly believe that switching email service providers or developing internal capabilities will inherently solve their problems. Ultimately, effective communication from the service provider about the value, timeline, and sustained commitment required is vital to managing these expectations and fostering long-term client relationships.
Key findings
- Unrealistic Expectations: Clients frequently seek a 'quick fix' or 'magic button' for email deliverability, becoming impatient when faced with the reality of continuous, complex effort.
- Resistance to Change: The truth about deliverability often involves unwinding bad practices, which can be a 'bitter pill' for clients, especially those unwilling to address their own harmful behaviors.
- Resource & Commitment Gaps: A lack of internal resources-including staff, budget, and a clear commitment to implementation-often prevents clients from executing recommended changes, leading to service termination.
- Underestimation of Complexity: Clients may overestimate their own knowledge and underestimate the multifaceted nature of deliverability, failing to grasp its fundamental, ongoing importance to marketing success.
- Competing Priorities: Deliverability improvements, despite their significant impact on ROI, can be deprioritized when other business objectives or budget reallocations are perceived as more urgent.
- Communication Breakdown: Insufficient articulation of the recommendations' value, expected timelines, and the ongoing commitment required from the client can lead to unmet expectations and dissatisfaction.
Key considerations
- Set Clear Expectations: Proactively educate clients that email deliverability is an ongoing process requiring continuous effort, not a one-time fix, to manage their expectations from the outset.
- Communicate Value Directly: Clearly articulate the long-term value of deliverability recommendations, explaining how they contribute to overall marketing success and ROI, even when the advice is challenging.
- Assess Client Commitment: Evaluate a client's willingness and internal capacity to commit resources-time, staff, and budget-to implement and sustain necessary changes.
- Emphasize Ongoing Maintenance: Highlight that maintaining good sender reputation requires continuous monitoring and adaptation, countering the misconception that problems are permanently resolved after initial fixes.
- Address Internal Hurdles: Be prepared to discuss and help navigate potential internal resistance, resource limitations, or conflicting priorities that might impede implementation.
- Build Trust & Transparency: Foster trust by clearly explaining the rationale behind recommendations, the expected timeline for results, and the mutual responsibilities for achieving deliverability goals.
What email marketers say
16 marketer opinions
Clients frequently disengage from email deliverability services after receiving advice, largely due to a misalignment of expectations and the challenging reality of remediation. Many anticipate an instant, effortless resolution, often described as a 'magic button,' rather than a continuous, multi-faceted process. This expectation clashes with the truth that improving deliverability often demands confronting and reversing ingrained, poor practices, which can be difficult to accept. Beyond this, clients may overestimate their own expertise or underestimate the intricate nature of email deliverability, believing simple solutions or a change in ESP will suffice. Practical constraints, such as insufficient internal resources, tight budgets, or other pressing business objectives, also frequently deter them from implementing the recommended changes. Ultimately, a lack of clear communication about the required effort, expected timelines, and the ongoing commitment needed can erode trust, leading clients to question the value of the service if immediate results are not apparent.
Key opinions
- Quick Fix Illusion: Clients often approach deliverability with the misconception that it is a 'one-time fix' requiring minimal effort, leading to dissatisfaction when continuous work is needed.
- Truth is a Bitter Pill: The necessary corrective actions often involve dismantling long-standing poor email practices, which many clients, especially bad actors, are unwilling or find difficult to accept.
- Misplaced Self-Confidence: Some clients overestimate their understanding of complex deliverability issues, underestimating the expertise required and believing basic knowledge or status is enough.
- Investment Reluctance: Clients may terminate services when faced with the financial and resource investment required for genuine improvement, prioritizing immediate costs over long-term benefits.
- False Hope in ESP Switch: A common misconception is that simply switching Email Service Providers will solve underlying deliverability problems, prompting clients to abandon current recommendations.
- Value Communication Gap: Failure to clearly communicate the long-term value, required commitment, and realistic timeline for deliverability improvements can lead to client dissatisfaction and early termination.
Key considerations
- Educate on Ongoing Effort: Clearly articulate from the outset that deliverability is a continuous optimization process, not a singular fix, to manage client expectations effectively.
- Navigate Difficult Truths: Be prepared to deliver challenging advice about unwinding bad practices, emphasizing the long-term benefits even when the immediate changes are uncomfortable for the client.
- Validate Client Resources: Before engagement, assess the client's internal capacity, budget, and willingness to commit resources to implement and sustain recommended changes.
- Debunk 'Magic Button' Myths: Proactively address the misconception that a new ESP or a quick technical tweak will instantly resolve deep-seated deliverability issues.
- Demonstrate ROI Clearly: Quantify the financial impact of poor deliverability and the return on investment for proposed solutions to justify the necessary financial and operational commitments.
- Foster Partnership & Patience: Cultivate a collaborative relationship by setting realistic timelines for results and explaining that significant improvements often require sustained effort and patience.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains that it's not normal with the right customer, but if it's the wrong type, they might not like the truth and seek a "quick fix".
2 Oct 2024 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks explains that it is very normal and sometimes clients are mean.
9 Oct 2024 - Email Geeks
What the experts say
2 expert opinions
Clients frequently discontinue email deliverability services after receiving recommendations, largely due to internal barriers preventing the implementation of advised changes. These challenges often include a lack of adequate resources-financial or human-internal resistance from various departments, or conflicting business priorities that sideline deliverability efforts. This inability to execute the suggested improvements can lead to a stagnation in results, causing clients to perceive the service as ineffective and ultimately leading to its termination.
Key opinions
- Implementation Hurdles: Clients frequently face significant challenges in executing recommended deliverability improvements, often due to their complexity or the organizational effort required.
- Internal Resistance to Change: Resistance from various internal departments or stakeholders, sometimes stemming from internal politics, can impede the adoption of crucial deliverability recommendations.
- Resource Limitations: A scarcity of resources, including budget, dedicated staff, or necessary technical infrastructure, often prevents clients from effectively implementing advised changes.
- Conflicting Business Priorities: Email deliverability initiatives can be overshadowed and deprioritized by other urgent business objectives, leading to a failure to act on expert recommendations.
- Lack of Perceived Progress: When recommendations are not implemented, clients often perceive a lack of progress in their deliverability, leading to frustration and the belief that the service itself is ineffective.
Key considerations
- Assess Implementation Capacity: Before and during engagement, evaluate the client's internal resources, including budget and personnel, to ensure they can realistically implement recommended deliverability changes.
- Anticipate Internal Resistance: Recognize that internal politics and stakeholder resistance can block the adoption of recommendations; provide strategies to help clients navigate these challenges.
- Align with Client Priorities: Help clients integrate deliverability improvements into their existing business objectives, demonstrating how these efforts support their broader goals and justify resource allocation.
- Set Realistic Progress Benchmarks: Establish clear, attainable milestones for deliverability improvement, emphasizing that visible progress is contingent upon consistent and diligent implementation of advice.
- Communicate Value of Implementation: Clearly articulate that the efficacy of the deliverability service is directly tied to the client's willingness and ability to implement the suggested changes, not just receive them.
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that clients often terminate deliverability services because they face significant challenges in implementing the recommended changes, such as internal resistance, resource limitations, or conflicting priorities, leading to a lack of perceived progress and frustration.
29 Mar 2023 - Spam Resource
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise shares that clients terminate email deliverability services after receiving recommendations often because they fail to implement the suggested changes due to factors like resource scarcity, internal politics, or misprioritization, which prevents deliverability improvement and leads clients to believe the service is ineffective.
1 Jun 2022 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
3 technical articles
Clients often discontinue email deliverability services, even after receiving detailed recommendations, primarily because they misjudge the nature of the work involved. Many clients view deliverability as a problem with a simple, quick solution, rather than an intricate, continuous process that demands ongoing commitment and technical adjustments. This leads to impatience when immediate, permanent results aren't achieved. Furthermore, a significant factor is the client's failure to fully comprehend the fundamental importance of deliverability to their overall email marketing success and return on investment, often leading them to perceive critical recommendations as merely optional suggestions instead of essential mandates.
Key findings
- Ongoing Process Misconception: Clients often misunderstand deliverability fixes as simple, one-time events, rather than recognizing them as complex, continuous efforts.
- Impatience for Results: Expectations of immediate and permanent results lead to client impatience when continuous monitoring and adaptation are required.
- Lack of Sustained Commitment: Clients may lack the willingness or capacity to commit to the significant ongoing work and resources needed beyond initial recommendations.
- Underappreciation of Value: Many clients do not fully understand the fundamental importance of deliverability to their overall email marketing success and ROI.
- Recommendations as Elective: Critical deliverability recommendations are often perceived by clients as optional suggestions rather than essential actions.
Key considerations
- Highlight Ongoing Nature: Emphasize that email deliverability is a continuous process requiring persistent monitoring and adaptation, not a single fix.
- Manage Result Expectations: Proactively set realistic expectations, clarifying that immediate, permanent results are unlikely and sustained effort is key.
- Verify Client Commitment: Assess the client's willingness and capacity to allocate ongoing effort and resources beyond the initial consultation phase.
- Reinforce ROI Link: Clearly demonstrate how strong deliverability directly contributes to email marketing success and improved return on investment.
- Position Recommendations as Vital: Communicate that deliverability recommendations are essential, foundational elements, not optional improvements, for effective email programs.
Technical article
Documentation from Mailgun explains that fixing email deliverability issues is a complex and multifaceted process, often requiring significant effort and technical adjustments. Clients may terminate services if they are unwilling or unable to commit to the ongoing work and resources needed beyond initial recommendations.
16 Aug 2024 - Mailgun
Technical article
Documentation from MailerLite explains that email deliverability is not a one-time fix but an ongoing process that requires continuous monitoring and adaptation to maintain a good sender reputation. Clients might terminate services if they expect immediate, permanent results after receiving initial recommendations and become impatient with the continuous effort required.
7 Jun 2025 - MailerLite Blog
How can I improve email deliverability for a client with a poor sender reputation and questionable email acquisition practices?
How long does it take to see email deliverability improvements?
How to identify the cause of declining email deliverability and improve it?
Why are cold email senders difficult to help with deliverability issues?
Why did my promotional emails suddenly start going to the spam folder after terminating my deliverability agency contract?
Why do email clients argue with deliverability experts about email marketing advice?
