ESPs recommend incorrect SPF configurations due to a complex interplay of factors. Legacy practices, outdated documentation, and the desire for simplified instructions for non-technical users all contribute. This simplification often sacrifices accuracy. Specific issues include incorrect guidance on the 5322.from address, failing to publish SPF records for 5321.from addresses, exceeding DNS lookup limits, and incorrectly instructing customers to include the ESP's domain in their SPF records. Furthermore, some ESPs demonstrate a lack of diligence, failing to update documentation or properly validate configurations. This confusion is exacerbated by the inherent complexities of SPF deployment, particularly when multiple email providers are involved. As a result, misconfigured SPF records can significantly impact deliverability and security.
11 marketer opinions
ESPs sometimes recommend incorrect SPF configurations due to a combination of factors, including legacy practices, oversimplified instructions for non-technical users, and outdated documentation. Some ESPs prioritize ease of implementation and reducing support requests over technical accuracy. This can lead to exceeding DNS lookup limits, publishing invalid SPF records, and potentially allowing malicious emails to appear legitimate. A lack of expertise and time commitment to updating documentation also contribute to the problem. Misunderstandings arise when clients have multiple mail providers and improperly add the SPF records.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Stack Overflow explains that some shared hosting providers recommend customers include the hosting provider's domain in their SPF record, but this can potentially allow malicious emails to be sent from that shared host, and make them seem valid.
13 Jun 2025 - Stack Overflow
Marketer view
Email marketer from MailerCheck suggests that some ESPs may recommend technically incorrect SPF configurations due to laziness, or not wanting to fully invest the time to provide customers with the correct instructions.
28 Oct 2022 - MailerCheck
7 expert opinions
ESPs often recommend incorrect SPF configurations due to flawed documentation, legacy practices, and a fundamental misunderstanding of SPF implementation. This results in companies not publishing SPF records correctly and exceeding DNS lookup limits. Common errors include instructing customers to include the ESP's domain in the customer's SPF record (which is invalid) and recommending incorrect `include` statements, leading to deployment problems and broken email deliverability.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks shares an example where an ESP instructs users to add include:email.influitive.com to their SPF record or use a specific IP address, warning about SPF lookup limits.
15 Feb 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that incorrect SPF configurations lead to companies not publishing SPF records for their 5321.from addresses and exceeding the 10 DNS lookup limit.
3 Sep 2021 - Email Geeks
6 technical articles
ESPs recommending incorrect SPF configurations often result in issues related to DNS lookup limits, improper SPF scope understanding, and syntax errors. RFC 7208 specifies a 10 DNS lookup limit, which is often exceeded due to nested `include` mechanisms. Additionally, confusion arises from blurring the distinction between the `MAIL FROM` address and the `From:` header. Incorrect syntax can lead to authentication failures, and failure to use the correct domain decreases deliverability. Validation is crucial to avoid phishing scams.
Technical article
Documentation from datatracker.ietf.org explains that the RFC 7208 specifies a limit of 10 DNS lookups for SPF records. Incorrect configurations often lead to exceeding this limit, which can cause SPF checks to fail.
13 Sep 2021 - datatracker.ietf.org
Technical article
Documentation from Google shares the importance of making sure you are using the correct domain for your mail sending in your SPF record, and if you fail to do this your mail is less likely to get delivered, as Google and other providers will correctly mark the email as spam or a threat.
3 Jun 2024 - Google Workspace Admin Help
Can a sender modify SPF records to alter SPF checking behavior?
Do I need to include Mailchimp's SPF record in my domain's SPF if Mailchimp handles the bounce address?
How can I optimize my SPF record to stay within the lookup limit when using multiple email sending services?
How do I properly set up SPF and DKIM records for email marketing, including handling multiple SPF records, IP ranges, bounce capturing, and Google Postmaster Tools verification?