Summary
While technically possible to deliver email to an A record if no MX record exists (as a fallback mechanism allowed by RFCs, especially for bulk-hosted vanity domains or due to shared hosting defaults), it's generally not recommended due to unreliability and potential issues. The absence of MX records indicates that a domain isn't primarily configured for receiving email. If only an AAAA record exists, delivery fails. MX records are essential for directing email to specific mail servers, ensuring reliable routing and delivery. Sending mail directly to hosts without MX records, while technically allowed, is inefficient and doesn't permit redundancy.
Key findings
- A Record Delivery: Email delivery to an A record is possible as a fallback when no MX record is present, but it's unreliable.
- MX Record Importance: MX records are crucial for directing email to the correct mail servers for a domain.
- Domain Configuration: Absence of MX records implies the domain is not properly configured to receive emails, though exceptions exist (shared hosting, vanity domains).
- AAAA Record Failure: If only an AAAA record exists without MX or A records, email delivery will fail.
- Inefficiency Without MX: Sending email without MX records is inefficient, requiring A record lookups for each delivery and lacking redundancy.
Key considerations
- Reliability: Relying on A records for email delivery is unreliable and can cause delivery issues.
- Configuration: Ensure MX records are correctly configured for reliable email routing and delivery.
- Best Practices: Using MX records aligns with email deliverability best practices.
- RFC vs. Practicality: Although permitted by RFCs, sending without MX records is not practical due to efficiency and redundancy concerns.
- Redundancy: MX records provide redundancy; A records do not offer the same level of fault tolerance.
What email marketers say
9 marketer opinions
While technically possible to deliver email to an A record if no MX record exists, it's generally not recommended or reliable. The absence of MX records typically indicates that a domain is not properly configured to receive emails, though shared hosting providers might default to A records. MX records are crucial for directing email to the correct mail server, ensuring reliable delivery and proper routing.
Key opinions
- A Record Delivery: Email can be delivered to an A record if no MX record exists, but it is not a standard or reliable practice.
- MX Record Importance: MX records are essential for directing email to the appropriate mail server.
- Domain Configuration: The absence of MX records usually suggests the domain is not correctly configured to receive emails.
- Shared Hosting: Shared hosting providers might default to using A records for mail delivery if MX records aren't set up.
Key considerations
- Reliability: Relying on A records for email delivery can be unreliable and lead to delivery issues.
- Configuration: Ensure MX records are properly configured for reliable email routing and delivery.
- Best Practices: Using MX records aligns with best practices for email deliverability.
- Domain Purpose: Consider the domain's purpose; if email is a priority, MX records are mandatory.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Namecheap explains that MX records direct email to a specific mail server. They are essential for receiving emails. If missing, email delivery is not guaranteed.
1 Feb 2024 - Namecheap
Marketer view
Email marketer from Hostinger answers that MX records are mandatory for receiving emails on your domain. They guide other mail servers to the correct destination.
9 Jul 2023 - Hostinger
What the experts say
5 expert opinions
While RFCs technically allow delivering email to an A record if no MX record exists, and it may be intentionally used for bulk-hosted vanity domains, it's generally not advisable. If neither MX nor A records exist, and only an AAAA record is present, delivery fails. The absence of MX records complicates mail routing and reduces redundancy. MX records inform systems where to deliver mail for a domain.
Key opinions
- A Record Fallback: Delivery to an A record is a fallback if no MX record is found, a practice mainly for backward compatibility.
- Vanity Domains: Bulk-hosted vanity domains may intentionally rely on A record delivery.
- AAAA Record Failure: If only an AAAA record exists without MX or A records, email delivery will fail.
- RFC Allowance, Practical Concerns: Sending mail without MX is allowed by RFCs but is inefficient and lacks redundancy.
- MX Record Purpose: MX records are crucial for informing other systems which servers handle mail for a domain.
Key considerations
- Efficiency: Direct delivery to A records is less efficient as it necessitates A record lookups for each delivery.
- Redundancy: Avoid relying on A records due to lacking redundancy offered by MX records.
- Modern Standards: Adhere to modern standards by ensuring MX records are properly configured for email handling.
- Delivery Failure: Recognize that delivery will fail if only an AAAA record exists, reinforcing the necessity of MX records.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that MX records tell the world what servers handle mail for your domain. If you don't have them, other systems don't know where to deliver your mail.
11 Dec 2024 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that if there's no MX record, no A record but there is a AAAA record the delivery fails, because Fallback to A only exists at all because of backwards compatibility with the pre-MX record internet. AAAA is more recent than MX, so anyone who has a AAAA record knows they should have an MX record.
29 Jun 2024 - Email Geeks
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
MX records are essential for email delivery as they specify the mail servers responsible for accepting email for a domain. Without them, emails may not be delivered. While RFC 5321 allows a fallback to the A record if no MX records are found, it is primarily a fallback. Incorrectly configured MX records can cause emails to bounce. MX records are required for proper routing, specifying mail server priority.
Key findings
- MX Record Definition: MX records designate the mail servers accepting emails for a domain.
- Delivery Reliance: Without MX records, email delivery is not guaranteed and may fail.
- A Record Fallback: RFC 5321 defines a fallback to the A record, but it is not the primary delivery method.
- Bounce Potential: Incorrect MX configurations can lead to emails bouncing back to senders.
- Routing and Priority: MX records are mandatory for email routing, defining mail server priority.
Key considerations
- Configuration Accuracy: Ensure MX records are correctly configured to prevent delivery failures.
- Fallback Limitations: Do not rely on A record fallback; it's not a substitute for proper MX records.
- Potential for Lost Emails: Understand that lacking MX records can result in lost or undeliverable emails.
- Prioritization: Use preference numbers to define the order in which mail servers should be used.
Technical article
Documentation from RFC 5321 explains that if no MX records are found, the mail server should treat the domain name as if it had an MX record pointing to the host itself, using the A record. However, this is a fallback mechanism.
23 Nov 2024 - RFC 5321
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft explains that MX records are required for routing e-mail to your domain. They also specify the order in which mail servers should be used; a lower preference number indicates a higher priority.
1 Mar 2023 - Microsoft
Can Proofpoint implementation and MX record changes during IP warming affect email deliverability?
Does having an MX record on the from domain improve email deliverability?
How can I bulk check and clean MX records for a list of domains?
How can I identify the SMTP provider from an MX record?
How can I lookup and categorize MX records for a large list of email addresses?
Is it bad practice to send email from a domain without an MX record?
