ISPs employ a multi-layered approach to identify and handle suspicious email, focusing on sender reputation, email authentication, user feedback, content analysis, and list hygiene. They monitor sender reputation using metrics like bounce rates, complaints, and engagement. Email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, and DMARC) are crucial for verifying sender identity and preventing spoofing. User feedback, including complaint feedback loops (FBLs), helps ISPs identify and address spam. Content analysis involves scanning for spam-like keywords, phrases, and formatting. Spam traps are used to identify senders with poor list hygiene. Monitoring sending volume and frequency, especially from new IPs, is also common. Senders are advised to maintain clean email lists, implement proper authentication, monitor their reputation using tools like Google Postmaster Tools, and avoid spam triggers in their email content. Testing deliverability via seed lists is also recommended.
10 marketer opinions
ISPs employ a multi-faceted approach to identify and handle suspicious email, focusing on sender reputation, content analysis, and recipient feedback. They monitor factors like bounce rates, spam complaints, and engagement metrics to assess sender trustworthiness. Techniques such as spam traps, feedback loops, and email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) are used to detect and filter unwanted messages. Senders can improve deliverability by practicing good list hygiene, gradually increasing sending volume, and avoiding spam triggers in their email content.
Marketer view
Marketer from Email Geeks shares that some ISPs provide IPs that they have high confidence are garbage mail, and blocking them is acceptable. He also suggests adding a header to suspect messages to inform Mailbox Providers (MBPs) that the messages are spam.
29 Dec 2021 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from Litmus explains that ISPs use sophisticated spam filters that analyze various aspects of an email, including the sender's IP address, domain reputation, email content, and user engagement. They recommend senders to test their emails before sending, use a reputable email service provider (ESP), and monitor their deliverability metrics to identify and address any issues.
27 Jun 2023 - Litmus
4 expert opinions
ISPs employ various methods to identify and handle suspicious email, with a strong emphasis on sender reputation, recipient feedback, and list hygiene. They utilize spam traps to catch senders with poor list management practices. Reputation scoring systems are used to assess the trustworthiness of sending IPs and domains, influencing email acceptance or filtering. Monitoring Complaint Feedback Loops is crucial for understanding recipient reactions and mitigating deliverability problems. Seed lists provide a mechanism for proactively testing deliverability across different mailbox providers.
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that ISPs and blocklist providers use spam traps (pristine and recycled) to identify senders with poor list hygiene practices. Hitting a spam trap indicates that the sender is either harvesting email addresses or not properly managing their list and can result in severe deliverability penalties.
11 Aug 2021 - Spam Resource
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise shares that seed lists can be used to test deliverability rates across different mailbox providers. By sending test emails to seed addresses, senders can identify potential blocking issues before widespread sending.
19 Apr 2022 - Word to the Wise
4 technical articles
ISPs like Google and Microsoft employ a combination of user reports, spam traps, authentication failures (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), content filtering, sender reputation analysis, and machine learning to identify and block suspicious emails. RFC documents outline mechanisms for reporting unsolicited bulk email. DMARC.org emphasizes the importance of DMARC to identify and block fraudulent emails. Senders are advised to authenticate their emails, maintain clean sending lists, and monitor their reputation using tools like Google Postmaster Tools.
Technical article
Documentation from Google explains that Google uses various signals to identify suspicious emails, including user reports, spam traps, and authentication failures (SPF, DKIM, DMARC). They advise senders to monitor their reputation through Google Postmaster Tools and address any issues promptly to avoid being flagged as suspicious.
19 Dec 2021 - Google
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft explains that their spam filters use a combination of technologies, including content filtering, sender reputation, and machine learning, to identify and block suspicious emails. They also provide guidance on best practices for senders to avoid being flagged as spam, such as authenticating emails and maintaining a clean sending list.
7 Jan 2022 - Microsoft
How can email senders and users prevent and identify phishing emails?
How can ESPs identify and block spammers before they damage IP reputation?
How can I identify and prevent spam/bot traffic at email subscription points?
How can I protect my domain from being spoofed and blacklisted?
How can spam complaints and bad content choices impact email deliverability?
How can you identify spammers?