The responses provide a nuanced view on the necessity of multipart/alternative emails. While some experts suggest it's no longer a strict best practice due to improved HTML rendering and potentially poor text version quality, many others advocate for its continued use. Key benefits include enhanced accessibility for screen reader users, improved deliverability by satisfying spam filters, compatibility with older or less capable clients, and ensuring readability when images are disabled. The documentation confirms that multipart messages are a standard method for sending multiple content types within a single email, commonly HTML and plain text.
7 marketer opinions
The consensus is that sending multipart/alternative emails, which include both HTML and plain text versions, remains a beneficial practice. The primary reasons cited are improved accessibility for users with disabilities (especially those using screen readers), enhanced deliverability (due to spam filters analyzing the text-to-HTML ratio), support for older or less capable email clients that may not render HTML properly, and ensuring readability even when images are disabled.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Campaign Monitor shares that HTML is good but alt-text can help a user understand the content of an email if they have images turned off.
11 Feb 2025 - Campaign Monitor
Marketer view
Email marketer from Reddit responds that alt text is essential because if a user can't load images they still understand your content because of the alt text.
14 Jan 2023 - Reddit
5 expert opinions
The provided answers present a mixed perspective on the continued necessity of sending multipart/alternative emails. While some experts argue that it's no longer a strict best practice, citing improved HTML rendering capabilities of modern email clients and poor quality of generated text versions, others emphasize the importance of plain text versions for accessibility, spam filtering, and compatibility with text-only clients. Choosing the correct content-type priority is also mentioned as a way to theoretically cater to different client capabilities.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks shares that you can choose your content-type priority in multipart/alternative so theoretically you can send text/plain for MUAs that can render it and text/html for the rest.
16 Jun 2024 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that including a plain text version alongside HTML is still recommended. They state that many email clients will display the plain text version if they cannot render HTML, and spam filters often analyze the plain text version.
29 Jun 2023 - Spam Resource
3 technical articles
The documentation sources uniformly describe multipart messages as a method for including multiple, related data types within a single email. This is achieved using the Content-Type header to define the different parts and their respective media types. A common application is sending both an HTML and a plain text version of the same content to ensure compatibility across different email clients.
Technical article
Documentation from Oracle Help Center shares that multipart MIME messages are helpful when you want to send a message with multiple, related parts. This could be an HTML message and a plain text alternative for compatibility.
27 Jul 2022 - Oracle Help Center
Technical article
Documentation from Mozilla explains that multipart messages are useful for sending multiple, related items in a single email. For example, to send an HTML version and a plain text version.
22 Jun 2023 - Mozilla
Are image-based emails a good practice, and what are the deliverability and accessibility implications?
Are there any ISPs or email clients that only accept text emails and reject HTML emails?
Can images in emails cause them to go to spam?
Do images in emails affect deliverability?
Does including a plain text version of an email improve deliverability and conversion rates?
Does plain text email version affect deliverability?