Suped

Is UCEPROTECT L3 a blacklist worth worrying about for email deliverability?

Summary

The consensus is that UCEPROTECT Level 3 (L3) is a controversial blacklist, listing entire IP ranges or ASNs based on the behavior of a few bad actors. While its intention is to combat spam and encourage ISPs to take responsibility, its impact on email deliverability is variable. Some experts downplay its significance, particularly for senders targeting major email providers like Gmail and Yahoo, who rely more on internal metrics. Others see it as a data point, suggesting a need to investigate potential underlying issues with sending practices. Smaller ISPs might use UCEPROTECT L3, making it more relevant for certain audiences. Key actions include monitoring deliverability metrics, understanding recipient ISP policies, and focusing on strong sender reputation and engagement metrics.

Key findings

  • Controversial Listing: UCEPROTECT L3 lists entire IP ranges/ASNs, affecting both good and bad senders.
  • Variable Impact: Impact depends on recipient ISP's policies; major providers often disregard it.
  • Monitoring Essential: Monitoring deliverability metrics helps determine actual impact and identify issues.
  • Signal for Investigation: A listing can signal underlying problems with sending practices requiring investigation.
  • Overly Agressive: Some experts suggest UCEPROTECT L3 is overly aggressive.

Key considerations

  • Audience Focus: Assess if recipients are with ISPs that use UCEPROTECT L3.
  • Monitoring Practices: Actively monitor deliverability, bounce rates, and sender reputation.
  • ISP Policies: Understand recipient ISPs' specific email filtering policies.
  • Reputation Building: Prioritize strong sender reputation, engagement, and authentication.
  • Internal Metrics: Focus on factors like user engagement, spam complaints, and authentication practices.

What email marketers say

11 marketer opinions

UCEPROTECT Level 3 (L3) is a controversial blacklist that lists entire IP ranges and ASNs, based on the behavior of a few bad actors within those ranges. Its impact on email deliverability varies; while some experts consider it overly aggressive and not worth significant concern, others suggest monitoring its effects, especially if a substantial portion of your recipients are with ISPs that use UCEPROTECT. Major email providers like Gmail and Yahoo may not heavily rely on UCEPROTECT L3, but smaller ISPs might. Being listed on UCEPROTECT L3 is often a signal to investigate potential issues with your sending practices.

Key opinions

  • Aggressive Listing: UCEPROTECT L3 lists entire IP ranges/ASNs, potentially affecting legitimate senders.
  • Variable Impact: Impact on deliverability varies; major providers may not rely on it, smaller ISPs might.
  • Monitoring Advised: Monitoring email deliverability metrics is crucial to assess the actual impact.
  • Signal for Investigation: Listing on UCEPROTECT L3 can indicate underlying issues with sending practices.

Key considerations

  • Recipient Base: Assess if a significant portion of your recipients are with ISPs that use UCEPROTECT.
  • Deliverability Metrics: Monitor deliverability rates, bounce rates, and sender reputation.
  • ISP Specific Policies: Understand the specific email filtering policies of the ISPs your recipients use.
  • Underlying Issues: If listed, investigate and address any potential problems with your sending practices.

Marketer view

Email marketer from EmailDrip.com shares that UCEPROTECT Level 3 is controversial because it lists entire IP ranges, potentially affecting senders with good practices. They suggest monitoring but not panicking unless deliverability issues arise.

13 Dec 2023 - EmailDrip.com

Marketer view

Marketer from Email Geeks mentions that all of their SparkPost IPs were recently listed on UCEPROTECT L2 and L3 but they saw no effect, however they don't send to Germany/Austria/etc.

10 Aug 2021 - Email Geeks

What the experts say

4 expert opinions

Experts offer mixed perspectives on the importance of UCEPROTECT Level 3 (L3) for email deliverability. Some advise against paying it much attention, suggesting it has no real impact. Others view it as more of a data point, signaling a need to investigate potential problems with sending practices. It's also noted that UCEPROTECT L3 might disproportionately concern smaller businesses lacking in-house deliverability expertise, potentially leading to overreactions, and that overall, focusing on reputation-based filters and engagement metrics is more important.

Key opinions

  • Limited Impact: Some experts suggest UCEPROTECT L3 has little to no actual impact on deliverability.
  • Data Point: UCEPROTECT L3 can act as a data point indicating potential issues with sending practices.
  • Overly Aggressive: UCEPROTECT L3 is seen by some as too aggressive due to its practice of blocking entire network blocks.

Key considerations

  • Small Business Impact: Smaller businesses might overreact due to a lack of deliverability expertise.
  • Reputation Focus: Prioritize reputation-based filters and engagement metrics over UCEPROTECT L3.
  • Investigate Listings: If listed, investigate potential sending practice problems.

Expert view

Experts from Email Geeks, Steve Atkins (WttW) says to pay no attention to UCEPROTECT. Laura Atkins (she/her) adds that she doesn't want to reinforce their bad behavior by mentioning it, also Steve adds no one sees any impact on deliverability from this blocklist.

15 May 2025 - Email Geeks

Expert view

Expert from Word to the Wise explains that UCEPROTECT level 3 might be a concern for smaller businesses that don't have dedicated deliverability experts. The listings themselves aren't necessarily critical, but if a small business lacks the resources to investigate, they may overreact and make unnecessary changes.

9 Feb 2025 - Word to the Wise

What the documentation says

5 technical articles

Documentation from various sources indicates that UCEPROTECT Level 3 (L3) aims to protect mail servers by listing ASNs originating spam, encouraging ISPs to address spam issues. However, the actual impact on deliverability varies significantly depending on the recipient mail server's policies. Larger providers often disregard UCEPROTECT L3 due to its broad approach. The effectiveness of any blocklist hinges on mail server configuration, and major providers like Microsoft and Google prioritize internal metrics like user engagement and sender reputation over solely relying on third-party blacklists.

Key findings

  • ASN Listing: UCEPROTECT L3 lists entire ASNs to combat spam.
  • Variable Impact: Impact depends on recipient mail server's policies; larger providers may ignore it.
  • Internal Metrics: Major providers prioritize internal metrics like engagement over external blocklists.
  • Configuration Dependent: Blocklist effectiveness depends on mail server configuration and policies.

Key considerations

  • Recipient Policies: Understand the recipient mail server's policies regarding blacklists.
  • Sender Reputation: Focus on improving sender reputation through good sending practices.
  • Engagement Metrics: Prioritize user engagement, minimize spam complaints, and ensure proper authentication.
  • Mail Server Configuration: Properly configure mail servers to align with best practices.

Technical article

Documentation from Spamhaus suggests that while UCEPROTECT listings can impact deliverability, the actual impact depends on the recipient mail server's policies. Many larger providers ignore UCEPROTECT Level 3 due to its broad-stroke approach.

4 Sep 2022 - Spamhaus

Technical article

Documentation from Microsoft responds that the effectiveness of a blacklist like UCEPROTECT depends on various factors, including the specific policies of the receiving mail server. Some servers may give more weight to certain lists than others, and Microsoft uses a variety of signals to determine email delivery, not solely relying on third-party blacklists.

15 Nov 2023 - Microsoft

Start improving your email deliverability today

Sign up