The overall sentiment is that paying for IP certification for email deliverability is *not* a guaranteed solution and its value is highly dependent on the sender's existing practices and specific circumstances. While some sources acknowledge potential benefits like improved relationships with certain ISPs, access to feedback loops, and enhanced data insights, the vast majority emphasize that strong foundational elements, such as responsible list management, proper authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), engaging content, and adherence to email marketing best practices, are far more crucial and cost-effective. It is mostly recommended for those with complex setups, persistent deliverability issues despite following best practices, or those targeting specific ISPs that favor certified senders. Thorough research and monitoring are always advised before investing. Certifications should be seen as a supplement to, not a replacement for, good email marketing hygiene.
12 marketer opinions
The value of paying for IP certification for email deliverability is widely debated. While it can offer benefits like improved reputation with some ISPs, access to feedback loops, and data insights, it's not a guaranteed fix and its effectiveness depends heavily on the sender's existing practices. Most experts agree that implementing fundamental deliverability best practices, such as list hygiene, authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), engaging content, maintaining low complaint rates, and consistent sending policies, are more crucial and often more cost-effective. Certification is most beneficial for senders with complex setups, deliverability issues that persist despite best practices, or those targeting specific ISPs that favor certified senders. Thorough research, understanding certification program requirements, and continuous monitoring are essential before investing.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks shares his experience of using Validity, IAPP Surety Mail and CSA, noting that success varies depending on the sender's practices. He suggests defining objectives and needs before investing in certification.
17 Nov 2021 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from StackOverflow shares their experience that IP certification can be beneficial if struggling with deliverability despite following best practices. They stress that its value lies in the data and feedback loops it provides.
23 Oct 2023 - StackOverflow
3 expert opinions
Experts generally suggest caution regarding IP certification for email deliverability. The consensus is that while it *might* provide some benefits or be helpful in complex situations, a solid sending reputation is primarily built on responsible list management, sound sending practices, engagement, authentication, list hygiene, and obtaining consent. It is not a substitute for these foundational elements; therefore, for many, the cost isn't justified.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that IP certification might be useful for organizations with complex sending setups, but advises that focusing on authentication, list hygiene and consent are more important for good deliverability.
4 Mar 2024 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Spamresource explains that IP certification offers some benefits but emphasizes that a good sending reputation relies more on responsible list management, sending practices and engagement. Certification is not a solution for bad practices.
16 Sep 2024 - Spamresource
4 technical articles
Technical documentation emphasizes that a strong sender reputation, built on solid sending practices and adherence to established guidelines and standards (like SPF, DKIM, DMARC), is paramount for email deliverability. While IP certification might offer some advantages (as claimed by Validity), it is not a replacement for good practices or a guaranteed solution. Major players like Microsoft and Google prioritize sender reputation based on engagement, user feedback, and adherence to their guidelines, underscoring the importance of focusing on these fundamental aspects rather than solely relying on certifications.
Technical article
Documentation from RFC explains the importance of email authentication standards such as SPF, DKIM, and DMARC for improving deliverability and preventing spoofing. They recommend implementing these standards to build trust with ISPs and enhance sender reputation, which is more important than IP certification.
5 Jan 2022 - RFC
Technical article
Documentation from Google Postmaster Tools highlights the importance of sender reputation for email deliverability. They advise focusing on improving sending practices and adhering to Google's guidelines rather than relying solely on certifications, as Google prioritizes sender reputation based on engagement and user feedback.
3 Sep 2022 - Google Postmaster Tools
Do SuretyMail and Validity Sender Certification increase inbox reach, and how do they work?
How important is IP certification for email deliverability?
Is Return Path certification worth it for improving email deliverability at Gmail?
Is ReturnPath Certification worth the investment for email deliverability?
Is Validity IP Certification worth the cost for email deliverability?
What are the benefits and costs of email certifications like CSA, Signal Spam, and M3AAWG for ESPs?