The image-to-text ratio in emails significantly impacts deliverability and user experience. A high image-to-text ratio, where images dominate over text, can trigger spam filters because spammers often use image-based emails to hide content. Email clients and ISPs analyze content, and a lack of text can hinder their ability to understand the email's purpose, leading to spam classification and negatively impacting sender reputation. This also creates accessibility issues for users who have images disabled or use screen readers. Maintaining a balanced ratio, ideally around 60% text and 40% images, ensures deliverability, accessibility, and positive user experience. Techniques like image compression, alt text implementation, and providing sufficient text content are essential to mitigate the negative impacts of a high image-to-text ratio.
10 marketer opinions
Maintaining a balanced image-to-text ratio in emails is crucial for achieving optimal deliverability. Email clients and spam filters analyze email content, and a disproportionate amount of images without sufficient text can lead to emails being flagged as spam. This is because many spam filters struggle to understand the email's purpose, and spammers often use image-heavy emails to bypass text-based filters. A healthy balance helps ISPs understand the email content, ensures accessibility for recipients, and improves overall engagement.
Marketer view
Email marketer from EmailOnAcid suggests balancing the use of images with sufficient text. The marketer explains a higher image-to-text ratio can trigger spam filters because it makes the email harder to scan and interpret by email clients and users alike, and it can also negatively impact accessibility for visually impaired recipients.
23 Aug 2024 - EmailOnAcid
Marketer view
Email marketer from Litmus recommends using images thoughtfully and balancing them with text. Litmus responds that primarily using images can make emails less accessible and harder for spam filters to understand the email's content, also adding that including descriptive alt text helps improve accessibility and helps email clients understand the image's purpose.
3 Feb 2025 - Litmus
3 expert opinions
A high image-to-text ratio in emails can negatively affect both deliverability and user experience. While it may not always be a direct deliverability issue, spam filters are more likely to view emails with a disproportionately high image content as suspicious. The lack of readable text impacts accessibility for users with visual impairments or those who have images disabled. If images don't load, recipients may be unable to understand the email's content, potentially leading to frustration and spam reports, which can ultimately harm deliverability.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise answers that overly relying on images, especially without adequate text, can negatively impact deliverability and accessibility. Spam filters might view emails with a high image-to-text ratio as suspicious, and recipients who have images turned off or use screen readers will have a poor experience.
7 Feb 2023 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that while predominantly using images in emails is bad practice for accessibility, it's generally not a direct deliverability issue unless recipients get frustrated and mark the emails as spam.
19 Aug 2021 - Email Geeks
4 technical articles
Email deliverability is affected by the image-to-text ratio, as disproportionately high image content can trigger spam filters and negatively impact sender reputation. Documentation from Spamhaus, Google Postmaster Tools, and Microsoft identifies that emails with excessive images and minimal text are often viewed as suspicious due to spammers using this technique to hide content. The lack of substantial text makes it difficult for email clients to determine the email's purpose, leading to potential spam classification and issues with proper rendering, as outlined in RFC documentation. Therefore, maintaining a balanced image-to-text ratio is crucial for ensuring emails are properly interpreted and delivered.
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft on Email Best Practices indicates that a high image-to-text ratio is a characteristic often found in spam emails. The documentation responds by stating that Microsoft's email filters are designed to identify such patterns, and emails with too many images and insufficient text may be more likely to be classified as junk.
3 Nov 2023 - Microsoft
Technical article
Documentation from Spamhaus explains that while not a direct factor, using disproportionately large images or an excessive number of images compared to text can negatively impact your sender reputation. They share that this is because spammers often use images to hide text and avoid content-based spam filters, leading mailbox providers to view such emails with suspicion.
26 Apr 2025 - Spamhaus
Are image-based emails a good practice, and what are the deliverability and accessibility implications?
Are image-only emails bad for deliverability?
Can images in emails cause them to go to spam?
Do images in email and PDF attachments affect email deliverability?
Do images in emails affect deliverability?
How do SpamAssassin HTML_IMAGE_RATIO scores affect email deliverability and how to diagnose outlook 365 spam issues?