Affiliate email marketing presents significant risks to sender deliverability and carries substantial legal implications. Spammy practices by affiliates, including sending unsolicited emails or using low-quality links, can negatively impact sender reputation, leading to potential blocklisting by organizations like Spamhaus. Additionally, links in affiliate emails carry a reputation and if spam complaints are associated with them, the sender's domain can be affected. Legal liabilities arise under US Federal Law and the CAN-SPAM Act, making senders responsible for their affiliates' compliance with email marketing regulations. This includes ensuring clear disclosure of the affiliate relationship, adhering to GDPR and other privacy laws, and refraining from deceptive practices. To mitigate these risks, it's essential for brands to thoroughly vet affiliates, monitor their marketing practices, establish clear agreements outlining acceptable behaviors, and prioritize the generation of high-quality traffic. Due diligence, including implementing measures to prevent spam, monitoring engagement metrics, and securing indemnification clauses, is also crucial to protect the sender's reputation and avoid legal repercussions.
11 marketer opinions
Affiliate marketing can significantly impact a sender's email deliverability and carries legal risks. Negative impacts arise from affiliates engaging in spammy practices, using low-quality links, or failing to comply with email marketing best practices and legal regulations. These actions can damage sender reputation, lead to blocklisting, and result in legal liabilities under laws like CAN-SPAM. To mitigate these risks, brands need to carefully vet affiliates, monitor their marketing practices, enforce compliance with regulations such as GDPR, segment email lists for better monitoring, and maintain clear agreements outlining acceptable practices. Ensuring high-quality traffic and ethical conduct from affiliates is crucial for preserving sender reputation and avoiding legal repercussions.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Email Geeks shares that links have reputation and if spam complaints are collected on emails with your links, it will affect you.
27 Apr 2023 - Email Geeks
Marketer view
Email marketer from IAmAffiliate forum responds that one approach is to ask existing affiliates to re-apply to the affiliate program and explain their marketing practices. This enables you to remove spammy affiliates.
4 Mar 2023 - IAmAffiliate
5 expert opinions
The use of affiliates in email marketing carries significant risks to sender deliverability and exposes organizations to potential legal liabilities. If affiliates engage in spammy practices, or don't follow compliance laws, the sender's reputation can be negatively impacted, potentially leading to blocklisting by services like Spamhaus. Furthermore, senders can be held legally responsible for their affiliates' actions, necessitating thorough due diligence. This includes vetting affiliates, ensuring they comply with CAN-SPAM and other relevant regulations, and potentially securing indemnification clauses to mitigate risks.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that if affiliates are sending enough spam, it can negatively impact deliverability. There could also be legal issues related to unsolicited emails, and in some regions, you are responsible for your affiliate's legal compliance.
15 Jan 2023 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks asks if the affiliates are being vetted or if traffic is being bought from a middleman who farms it out to spammers.
26 May 2025 - Email Geeks
3 technical articles
Affiliate marketing practices are subject to scrutiny from organizations like the FTC and Spamhaus. The FTC mandates clear and conspicuous disclosure of the affiliate relationship, with potential legal repercussions for non-compliance. Spamhaus actively monitors affiliate spam, and widespread spamming by affiliates can lead to the parent domain being blocklisted. Furthermore, the CAN-SPAM Act stipulates shared liability between affiliates and the companies they represent for violations, particularly if both parties benefit from deceptive practices.
Technical article
Documentation from FTC.gov emphasizes that affiliate marketers must clearly and conspicuously disclose their relationship with the merchant. Failure to do so can result in legal action from the FTC.
25 Jul 2022 - FTC.gov
Technical article
Documentation from FTC states that under the CAN-SPAM Act, both the affiliate and the company being advertised can be held liable for violations if they benefit from deceptive practices.
22 Jul 2024 - FTC
Are cold outreach 'best practices' actually illegal spam tactics?
Can an ESP allow its users to use the ESP's physical address in marketing emails under CAN-SPAM?
Can I email a competitor's customer list if they went out of business and gave it to me?
Do email unsubscribes negatively affect sender reputation?
How can I improve email deliverability for a client with a poor sender reputation and questionable email acquisition practices?
How can I prevent my domain from being blacklisted due to an infected employee's computer or scraping contact information?
How can you identify spammers?
What are the CAN-SPAM and CASL requirements for unsubscribe confirmation pages, preference updates, and email re-entry?
What are the legal and deliverability implications of including promotional content in transactional emails?
What are the legal timeframes for unsubscribing email addresses by country?
What is a good spam rate and what does the percentage mean?