While long URLs are generally not a primary cause for emails being marked as spam, they can contribute to a higher spam score, especially if they contain unusual characters, excessive parameters, or personally identifiable information (PII). The reputation of the domain within the URL and the relevance/trustworthiness of the linked content are more critical factors. Email authentication protocols (DKIM, SPF) help establish trust, independent of URL length. Using URL shorteners can be a solution, but branded or reputable short domains are preferred. Monitoring how ESPs rewrite URLs is also important. The potential for reverse-engineering and creating malicious URLs is another consideration.
11 marketer opinions
While URL length is not a primary trigger for spam filters, excessively long, obfuscated, or parameterized URLs can raise suspicion and contribute to a higher spam score. The reputation of the domain within the URL and the relevance of the content are more critical factors. Using URL shorteners can help, but branded or reputable short domains are preferred over generic ones. Checking how ESPs rewrite URLs is also advisable.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Litmus reports that URL shorteners can negatively impact deliverability if abused or used with untrusted services. Using a branded short domain or full URLs from a reputable domain is preferred.
18 Apr 2022 - Litmus
Marketer view
Email marketer from GMass shares that the reputation of the domain within the URL is far more critical than the length. A trustworthy domain will fare better in spam filters, regardless of URL length, while a suspicious domain will struggle even with short URLs.
21 Dec 2021 - GMass
5 expert opinions
While long URLs themselves may not be the primary trigger for spam filters, they can contribute to a higher spam score, especially if they contain unusual characters or encodings. The presence of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or email addresses in URLs can also be problematic. Furthermore, long URLs can raise security concerns, such as the potential for reverse-engineering and the creation of malicious links. Ultimately, the reputation of the domain within the URL is more significant than its length.
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that very long URLs can be a factor in triggering spam filters, especially if they contain unusual characters or encodings. While not a definitive cause, they contribute to the overall spam score.
1 Oct 2024 - Spam Resource
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks raises a concern about the possibility of reverse-engineering the link to create a malicious URL.
8 Apr 2024 - Email Geeks
4 technical articles
While HTTP/1.1 doesn't specify a URL length limit, focusing on server support, Google recommends simple URLs for better crawlability. DKIM and SPF are crucial for email authentication, building sender trust and reducing spam flags, independent of URL length. These mechanisms protect against spoofing and validate sender legitimacy, directly impacting deliverability more than URL length.
Technical article
Documentation from Google Search Central shares that, while focused on web crawling, Google recommends keeping URLs simple and logical. Although they don't explicitly mention spam filters, a complex URL structure can make it harder for search engines (and potentially spam filters) to understand the page's content.
23 Jul 2024 - Google
Technical article
Documentation from openspf.org explains that implementing Sender Policy Framework (SPF) records to authenticate email sending sources. This improves deliverability by validating the sender's legitimacy, independent of URL length. It protects against sender spoofing.
24 Dec 2023 - openspf.org
Are Bitly links bad for email deliverability?
Are HTTP links penalized by spam filters in email marketing?
Are URL shorteners like bit.ly bad for email deliverability?
How do multiple or long links affect email deliverability?
How do URL shorteners and domain reputation impact email deliverability?
How does URL length affect email deliverability?