Summary
Experts, marketers, and documentation sources agree that challenge-response systems are ineffective for email deliverability for a multitude of reasons. These systems create a poor user experience by adding frustrating verification steps, often get mistaken for spam by modern filters, and disrupt the customer journey. They fail to address underlying deliverability issues like poor list hygiene and can even exacerbate spam problems by causing backscatter or spamming forged addresses. Modern email authentication methods like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC offer more robust, transparent, and user-friendly solutions.
Key findings
- Poor User Experience: Challenge-response systems create a negative and frustrating experience for recipients due to additional verification steps.
- Mistaken for Spam: Modern spam filters often mistake challenge-response systems for spam, hindering legitimate email delivery.
- Disrupted Customer Journey: These systems disrupt the customer journey by adding an extra verification step, reducing engagement opportunities.
- Ineffective Against Spammers: Spammers can easily bypass challenge-response systems, making them ineffective at deterring spam.
- Backscatter and Forged Addresses: Challenge-response systems can lead to backscatter spam or the unintended consequence of spamming forged email addresses.
- Unsuitable for Autoresponders: They are unsuitable for autoresponders and can cause problems with ticketing systems.
- Modern Methods Superior: Modern authentication methods like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC offer more effective, reliable, and transparent email authentication.
- Doesn't fix root cause: Challenge-response systems don't address underlying deliverability issues like poor list hygiene and sender reputation.
Key considerations
- Implement Modern Authentication: Adopt SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to improve email deliverability and security.
- Avoid Challenge-Response: Refrain from using challenge-response systems due to their ineffectiveness and potential harm.
- Focus on User Experience: Prioritize email authentication methods that provide a seamless and positive user experience.
- Build Sender Reputation: Focus on building a strong sender reputation through consistent sending habits, engaging content, and proper list management.
- Maintain List Hygiene: Regularly clean and maintain your email list to improve deliverability rates.
- Review Business Model: If facing deliverability problems with challenge-response, review your business model as it may be contributing to the issues.
What email marketers say
9 marketer opinions
Challenge-response systems are largely ineffective for modern email deliverability due to creating poor user experiences, being mistaken for spam, disrupting the customer journey, and failing to address the underlying issues of deliverability like sender reputation and list hygiene. Modern email authentication methods and deliverability best practices offer more robust and user-friendly solutions.
Key opinions
- Poor User Experience: Challenge-response systems create a frustrating experience for recipients, often leading to confusion and potential abandonment of communication.
- Mistaken for Spam: Modern spam filters often mistake challenge-response systems for spam, hindering legitimate email delivery.
- Disrupted Customer Journey: The extra verification step disrupts the customer journey and reduces engagement opportunities.
- Business Model Issue: Deliverability issues related to challenge-response are likely a business model issue rather than a pure deliverability problem.
- Ticketing System Issues: Challenge-response systems can cause problems with ticketing systems, potentially generating new tickets due to challenge responses.
- Underlying issues unaddressed: Challenge-response does not fix underlying deliverability issues like poor list hygiene.
Key considerations
- Sender Reputation: Focus on building a strong sender reputation through consistent sending habits, engaging content, and proper list management.
- Modern Authentication: Implement modern email authentication methods like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC for better deliverability and security.
- List Hygiene: Maintain a clean and up-to-date email list to avoid deliverability issues.
- Valuable Content: Create valuable and engaging content that recipients want to receive.
- Alternative Systems: Consider alternative systems for verification and authentication.
Marketer view
Email marketer from StackExchange explains that modern email deliverability best practices focus on building a good sender reputation through consistent sending habits, engaging content, and proper list management, which are more effective and user-friendly than challenge-response systems.
7 Sep 2022 - StackExchange
Marketer view
Email marketer from Postmark shares that challenge-response systems can damage sender reputation by triggering false positives and preventing legitimate emails from reaching recipients. This can lead to decreased engagement rates and lower overall email performance.
19 May 2022 - Postmark
What the experts say
5 expert opinions
Experts agree that challenge-response systems are ineffective for email deliverability for several reasons. They create a negative user experience, are easily bypassed by spammers, and can lead to unintended consequences such as spamming forged addresses. Modern email authentication methods like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC offer more reliable and transparent verification.
Key opinions
- Negative User Experience: Challenge-response systems require additional steps that frustrate legitimate senders without deterring spammers.
- Forged Addresses: Challenge-response systems can exacerbate spam problems by leading to the spamming of forged email addresses.
- Outdated Technology: Challenge-response systems are outdated and don't offer improvements over modern authentication methods.
- Circumvented by Spammers: Spammers can easily bypass challenge-response systems, rendering them ineffective.
- Modern Authentication Superior: SPF, DKIM, and DMARC provide more reliable and secure email authentication.
Key considerations
- Implement Modern Authentication: Adopt SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to improve email deliverability and security.
- Avoid Challenge-Response: Refrain from using challenge-response systems due to their ineffectiveness and potential negative impact.
- Focus on User Experience: Prioritize email authentication methods that provide a seamless user experience.
- Regularly Update Security: Stay up-to-date with the latest email security best practices to combat evolving spam tactics.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks explains that unless C/R systems solve the forged address problem they’re going to create more spam than they solve and this is an ongoing issue.
20 Dec 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Spamresource.com explains that modern email authentication methods like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are more effective and reliable than challenge-response systems. These methods offer a more transparent and secure way to verify the sender's identity without burdening recipients.
12 Apr 2023 - Spamresource.com
What the documentation says
5 technical articles
Documentation from various sources highlights the ineffectiveness of challenge-response systems due to their unsuitability for autoresponders, creation of backscatter spam, inability to differentiate between legitimate and illegitimate senders, and the availability of superior modern authentication methods like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. These modern methods provide more robust, transparent, and less intrusive solutions for email authentication.
Key findings
- Unsuitable for Autoresponders: Challenge-response systems are not suitable for autoresponders, leading to backscatter spam and misdirected responses.
- False Positives: They often fail to differentiate between legitimate and illegitimate senders, resulting in false positives and blocked emails.
- Modern Methods Superior: SPF, DKIM, and DMARC offer more effective, reliable, and less intrusive email authentication.
- DMARC Robustness: DMARC provides a robust and transparent solution, allowing senders to specify how to handle unauthenticated emails.
- Prevents Spoofing: Modern methods effectively prevent spoofing and phishing without burdening legitimate recipients.
Key considerations
- Implement Modern Authentication: Adopt SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to enhance email deliverability and security.
- Avoid Challenge-Response: Refrain from using challenge-response systems due to their limitations and potential harm.
- Configure Mail Filters: Ensure mail filters do not automatically generate responses to null reverse-path messages to prevent backscatter.
- Domain Authorization: Use SPF to specify authorized mail servers for your domain, preventing spoofing.
Technical article
Documentation from rfc-editor.org explains that challenge-response systems are unsuitable for autoresponders. The document specifies that mail filters SHOULD NOT automatically generate return receipts, delivery status notifications (DSNs), or "vacation"/"out-of-office" responses in response to messages with a "MAIL FROM: <>" (null reverse-path) or other return addresses different from the one in the "From:" header. This is because these automatic responses can be misdirected and abused, creating backscatter spam.
25 Aug 2023 - rfc-editor.org
Technical article
Documentation from Microsoft Learn explains that modern email authentication methods like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are more effective and less intrusive than challenge-response systems. These methods verify the sender's identity without requiring recipient interaction.
25 Jan 2022 - Microsoft Learn
Are abuse reports and feedback loops (FBLs) still useful in email marketing, and how do they work with different email clients?
How did the UPS SPF scam work and what vulnerabilities did it exploit?
How do challenge response systems affect senders and third parties?
What are the limitations of the first amendment regarding free speech?
