The decision of whether to use a shared pool of dedicated IPs or separate IPs with subdomains for multiple newsletters hinges on control, volume, and risk tolerance. Sharing a dedicated IP pool internally, with all senders adhering to best practices and sending legitimate opt-in mail, can be viable and efficient. However, this approach requires careful management and can be risky if sending practices vary. Using separate IPs and subdomains isolates reputation issues, ensuring that problems with one newsletter don't affect others. High-volume senders generally benefit from dedicated IPs, which offer greater control over sender reputation. Regardless of the IP strategy, proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) and consistent sending patterns with good engagement are essential for maintaining deliverability. Also, IP warmup is important when using dedicated IPs.
9 marketer opinions
The question of whether to use a shared pool of dedicated IPs or separate IPs for multiple newsletters with different subdomains elicits varied recommendations, largely dependent on volume, control, and risk tolerance. Shared IP pools can be advantageous if you control all sending practices and volumes are consistent, allowing for efficient resource utilization. However, they pose a risk if sending practices are inconsistent or if you lack control over the other senders sharing the pool, as their actions can negatively impact your sender reputation. Separate IPs and subdomains offer better isolation of reputation issues; if one newsletter encounters deliverability problems, it won't necessarily affect the others. Regardless of the IP strategy, proper email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) and a consistent sending pattern with good engagement are crucial for maintaining a positive sender reputation and achieving optimal deliverability.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Mailjet shares that dedicated IP pools give you control over your sender reputation, which is crucial for maintaining high deliverability. This means that your sending reputation isn’t affected by the activities of other senders who are sharing an IP address.
24 Aug 2021 - Mailjet
Marketer view
Email marketer from Litmus shares that sender reputation is influenced by factors like email volume, spam complaints, and engagement rates. A consistent sending pattern and high engagement can improve your sender reputation, regardless of whether you use shared or dedicated IPs. They did not answer shared pool directly but gave key information about IP reputation.
28 Dec 2023 - Litmus
5 expert opinions
The experts offer a nuanced view on using shared pools of dedicated IPs versus separate IPs for multiple newsletters. If all data is legitimate opt-in and the sending volume is consistent, a shared pool managed internally can be viable. The number of IPs needed depends on volume, and platform recommendations should be considered. Maintaining distinct domains for each newsletter is recommended for isolating deliverability problems and preserving domain reputation. Dedicated IPs offer the best control over sender reputation, but require adherence to best practices and consistent sending. Warming up new IPs is crucial for establishing a positive reputation with ISPs.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests keeping different domains for each newsletter, since domain reputation is well handled by Gmail, and this will help you isolate Gmail problems that may come up in the future. The admin work to switch it all over + that would mean a bit of a reset of domain reputation for some of them, makes me think it wouldn't be worth it.
25 Jun 2021 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise Laura Atkins explains the importance of IP warmup, particularly when transitioning to a dedicated IP. She emphasizes the need to gradually increase sending volume to establish a positive reputation with ISPs. She does not directly discuss shared pools vs separate IPs but explains the need to maintain IP reputation which is key for email deliverability.
22 Apr 2023 - Word to the Wise
4 technical articles
The documentation emphasizes several key aspects of email deliverability related to IP addresses and sender reputation. Dedicated IP addresses offer control over sender reputation, particularly beneficial for high-volume senders with consistent sending practices. IP pools enable segmentation of mail streams, allowing for isolation of reputation issues across different types of emails or brands, whether implemented through separate IPs or subdomains. Maintaining a good sender reputation is crucial, and authentication methods like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are essential for verifying sender identity and preventing spam.
Technical article
Documentation from Amazon Web Services explains that dedicated IP addresses are suitable for senders who want to manage their own reputation. They provide complete control over the sending reputation, which is crucial for high-volume senders who can maintain consistent sending practices. They don't directly address shared pools vs. separate IPs for multiple newsletters but provides core information to help come to a conclusion.
6 Nov 2023 - Amazon Web Services
Technical article
Documentation from RFC explains that SPF (Sender Policy Framework) is an email authentication method designed to prevent spammers from sending messages on behalf of your domain. It specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email from your domain, improving deliverability.
27 Jul 2022 - RFC
Can I use two subdomains on one dedicated IP address for different email types?
Can one dedicated IP be mapped to multiple sub-domains for email?
How many subdomains should I use per dedicated IP address for email sending?
Is a dedicated IP address needed for sending 150K-200K emails per month?
Is a dedicated IP beneficial for high-volume email sending even without deliverability issues?
What are the pros and cons of sending email from subdomains vs a single domain with multiple IPs, and how can I optimize my signup process and sender reputation for a growing business with small sending volumes?