Summary
To successfully get Microsoft to reclassify a website link redirector, a multi-faceted approach is required. Immediate steps involve reporting the misclassification through the Microsoft Security Intelligence portal and escalating via Microsoft support, emphasizing business impact. Simultaneously, actively monitor domain/IP reputation via tools like Talos Intelligence and MXToolbox, investigate SmartScreen warnings, and scan with VirusTotal to identify any specific vendor flagging. Address potential security issues flagged in Google Search Console. Ensure correct DNS records (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) for proper email authentication. Given Microsoft's reliance on third-party data, identifying and contacting the flagging source is critical. Long-term, prioritize building a positive domain reputation by adhering to best practices in email sending, maintaining low spam complaint rates, and fostering subscriber engagement. Using a dedicated IP and custom domain for the link redirector, as well as cautiously selecting link shorteners, can further enhance trust. Understanding Microsoft’s sender perspective and consistently monitoring deliverability metrics completes a comprehensive strategy.
Key findings
- Multiple Reporting Channels: Utilize the Microsoft Security Intelligence portal, direct Microsoft Support, and escalation through internal Microsoft contacts for reporting.
- Proactive Monitoring is Essential: Regularly monitor domain/IP reputation (Talos, MXToolbox), SmartScreen warnings, Google Search Console, and conduct VirusTotal scans.
- Third-Party Data Dependence: Microsoft heavily relies on third-party threat intelligence; identifying/contacting the flagging source is crucial for quicker resolution.
- Technical Configuration Matters: Correct SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records are critical for email authentication and deliverability.
- Sender Reputation is King: Building/maintaining a positive domain reputation through responsible sending practices is paramount for long-term success.
Key considerations
- Dedicated Resources: Investing in a dedicated IP and custom domain for the link redirector offers greater control over reputation and deliverability.
- Root Cause Analysis: Understanding the *specific reason* for the flagging is crucial for targeted and effective remediation.
- Persistence Pays Off: Persistence in contacting Microsoft support and the flagging source, armed with detailed evidence, can significantly improve outcomes.
- Long-Term Strategy: Focus on sustainable email sending practices, subscriber engagement, and proactive security monitoring for continuous reputation management.
- Holistic Approach: Address both technical aspects (DNS, security) and reputation-based factors for a comprehensive solution.
What email marketers say
11 marketer opinions
To address Microsoft's misclassification of a website link redirector, several approaches can be taken. Immediate actions include reporting the issue through the Microsoft Security Intelligence portal and escalating via Microsoft support channels, emphasizing the business impact with detailed evidence. Checking domain and IP reputation using tools like Talos Intelligence and MXToolbox helps identify potential issues. Verifying correct DNS record configuration (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) is essential for email authentication. Since Microsoft uses third-party data, identifying and contacting the source flagging the URL can expedite removal. Long-term strategies involve building a positive domain reputation through responsible sending practices, low spam complaint rates, and high subscriber engagement. Furthermore, consider using a dedicated IP and custom domain for the link redirector, avoiding shared or problematic link shorteners. Regularly scan the site using VirusTotal and address any identified security issues reported in Google Search Console.
Key opinions
- Reporting Mechanisms: Utilize the Microsoft Security Intelligence portal for reclassification requests and engage Microsoft support channels directly.
- Reputation Monitoring: Regularly check domain and IP reputation using tools like Talos Intelligence and MXToolbox to identify any negative listings.
- Third-Party Data: Microsoft relies on third-party data for threat intelligence; identifying and contacting the original source flagging the URL can be effective.
- DNS Configuration: Properly configure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records to ensure email authentication and improve deliverability.
Key considerations
- Dedicated Resources: Consider using a dedicated IP address and custom domain for the link redirector to enhance trust and control over reputation.
- Reputation Building: Focus on building a positive domain reputation through responsible sending practices, low spam complaint rates, and high subscriber engagement.
- Security Audits: Regularly scan the website link redirector using VirusTotal and monitor Google Search Console for security issues to proactively address potential problems.
- Link Shortener Usage: Exercise caution with link shorteners, as some may be flagged; consider using a custom domain for the link redirector to maintain control over reputation.
- Escalation: If initial reporting doesn't yield results, escalate through higher-level support channels, providing detailed documentation and emphasizing business impact.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Microsoft Support explains that if your site is incorrectly classified, you can submit it for review via the Microsoft Security Intelligence portal. The portal allows you to submit URLs/domains for analysis and potential reclassification.
1 Sep 2023 - Microsoft Support
Marketer view
Email marketer from Security Vendor Forum explains that understanding that Microsoft often relies on third-party data feeds for threat intelligence. If you can identify the source of the flagging, contacting that vendor directly may be a more effective route to resolution.
22 Oct 2022 - Security Vendor Forum
What the experts say
2 expert opinions
To get Microsoft to reclassify a website link redirector, it's essential to focus on sender reputation. Understanding the factors that contribute to it, such as content, sending practices, and potential blacklisting, is crucial. Mitigation involves identifying the root cause of the misclassification and taking corrective actions to improve your reputation. Additionally, it is important to understand how Microsoft views senders, which includes actively monitoring deliverability rates, spam complaints, and engagement metrics to identify any issues that may affect classification.
Key opinions
- Sender Reputation Matters: Sender reputation is a key factor in how Microsoft classifies websites.
- Understand Microsoft's Perspective: It's crucial to understand how Microsoft views senders and their practices.
- Mitigation Involves Root Cause Analysis: Corrective actions should be based on identifying the root cause of the misclassification.
Key considerations
- Monitor Key Metrics: Actively monitor deliverability rates, spam complaints, and engagement metrics.
- Improve Sending Practices: Ensure sending practices are aligned with best practices to maintain a positive reputation.
- Address Blacklisting Issues: Identify and address any potential blacklisting issues promptly.
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains that it's crucial to understand how Microsoft views senders and their practices. Monitor deliverability rates, spam complaints, and engagement metrics to identify any potential issues that may be affecting your classification.
19 Mar 2024 - Word to the Wise
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource, Laura Atkins, emphasizes understanding sender reputation and the factors that contribute to it. Mitigation involves identifying the root cause of the classification, whether it's related to content, sending practices, or blacklisting, and taking corrective actions to improve reputation.
10 Oct 2023 - Spam Resource
What the documentation says
3 technical articles
To reclassify a website link redirector in Microsoft, understanding the reasons behind SmartScreen warnings is crucial, as they are triggered by factors like reputation and content. Regularly monitor Google Search Console for security issues and address them promptly. Additionally, scan the website using VirusTotal to identify if any security vendors have flagged the site, allowing for targeted corrective actions.
Key findings
- SmartScreen Triggers: Microsoft SmartScreen warnings are triggered by reputation, content, and other factors.
- Google Search Console Monitoring: Google Search Console's security issues report can identify website problems that cause flagging.
- VirusTotal Scanning: VirusTotal can reveal if specific security vendors are flagging the site.
Key considerations
- Reputation Building: If reputation is the cause, focus on building trust over time.
- Security Issue Resolution: Promptly address security issues identified in Google Search Console.
- Vendor Specific Actions: If VirusTotal identifies a specific vendor flagging the site, target your efforts toward resolving their concerns.
Technical article
Documentation from VirusTotal explains to use VirusTotal to scan your website link redirector for any malicious flags by different security vendors. This helps identify if a specific vendor is flagging your site, allowing you to focus your efforts on that particular vendor.
13 Apr 2022 - VirusTotal
Technical article
Documentation from Google Search Central recommends using the security issues report in Google Search Console to identify any security issues on your website that may be causing Microsoft to flag it. Address any identified issues promptly.
4 Apr 2025 - Google Search Central
Does Microsoft Outlook support BIMI for displaying brand logos in email?
How can I improve email deliverability with Microsoft and avoid spam filters?
How can I improve my sender reputation and inbox placement with Microsoft?
How can I re-evaluate a domain's SCL and BCL with Microsoft?
How do I get my emails out of spam for Hotmail and Outlook?
What are Microsoft SCL and BCL ratings and how do they affect email deliverability?
