Summary
Decoding Comcast FBL email addresses is generally impossible due to their one-way hash encryption. The purpose is to prevent third parties from identifying complainers. Instead, senders should focus on matching FBL data with identifiers (unique user IDs, logged masked addresses) embedded in email headers or system logs. These identifiers allow for user identification and unsubscribing within the sender's system. Implementing List-Unsubscribe headers and checking Comcast's documentation are helpful for reducing complaints and understanding their specific FBL mechanism. Standard FBL documentation and platform documentation like Microsoft SNDS do not decode these addresses but offer insight into FBL structure and sender reputation.
Key findings
- Decoding Not Possible: Comcast FBL email addresses are one-way hashed and cannot be directly decoded.
- Identifier Matching is Crucial: Matching FBL data with embedded unique identifiers or logged masked addresses is the key to identifying users.
- Use Internal Systems: Rely on internal systems and logs to correlate FBL data with user accounts.
- Comcast's Approach: Comcast's documentation focuses on utilizing the provided FBL data, not on decoding the email address.
- Privacy Protection: The one-way hash protects complainers' identities from third parties.
Key considerations
- Implement Identifier Strategy: Develop a strategy for embedding unique identifiers or logging masked addresses.
- Integrate FBL Data: Integrate FBL data into your internal systems for efficient processing.
- Ensure Data Correlation: Establish robust mechanisms to correlate FBL data with user accounts.
- Prioritize Easy Unsubscribe: Implement List-Unsubscribe headers and easy unsubscribe processes to reduce complaints.
- Comcast Documentation: Consult Comcast's documentation for any specific FBL requirements.
What email marketers say
9 marketer opinions
Decoding Comcast FBL email addresses directly is generally not possible. The addresses are intentionally obfuscated to prevent scraping. Instead, email senders should focus on leveraging alternative methods for identifying users who trigger FBLs. These methods involve embedding unique identifiers in email headers or logging the masked address alongside user data in internal systems, allowing for correlation and subsequent unsubscription upon receiving FBL reports. Checking Comcast's documentation for specific guidance is also recommended.
Key opinions
- Decoding Not Possible: Direct decoding of Comcast FBL email addresses is generally not feasible due to intentional obfuscation.
- Utilize Unique Identifiers: The most effective method involves embedding and tracking unique identifiers in email headers to link FBL data to specific user accounts.
- Log Masked Addresses: Logging the masked email address alongside user data in your system allows for easy identification upon receiving FBL reports.
- Comcast Specific Guidance: Consult Comcast's documentation for any provider-specific guidance on managing their FBL data.
Key considerations
- System Design: Design your email sending system to incorporate unique identifiers and log masked addresses for efficient FBL processing.
- Data Correlation: Ensure robust data correlation mechanisms are in place to link FBL data with user accounts in your database.
- Privacy Compliance: Handle FBL data and user information in accordance with privacy regulations.
- Fallback Mechanisms: Implement fallback mechanisms for cases where identifiers are missing or correlation fails.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Stack Overflow explains that in general you cannot easily decode such addresses because they are designed to prevent scraping. However, the original sender who set up the obfuscation should have a mapping in their database to decode.
22 Nov 2022 - Stack Overflow
Marketer view
Email marketer from Reddit explains that while you can't reverse the hash, the purpose isn't to block you, the sender, from identifying the user. Your system should correlate the hashed ID with the user's profile in your database to process the unsubscribe.
3 Jul 2023 - Reddit
What the experts say
4 expert opinions
Decoding Comcast FBL email addresses directly is impossible due to their one-way hash encryption. This measure protects complainers' identities from third parties, but senders are expected to identify users via other methods. Focus on matching FBL data with unique identifiers embedded in email headers to unsubscribe users. While List-Unsubscribe headers are important for reducing complaints, they don't help in decoding Comcast's FBL addresses.
Key opinions
- Decoding Impossible: Comcast FBL email addresses cannot be directly decoded due to one-way hashing.
- Identifier Matching is Key: Identify users by matching FBL data with unique identifiers you've embedded in your email headers.
- Privacy Focus: One-way hashing protects complainers' identities from third parties.
- List-Unsubscribe Indirectly Helps: Implementing easy unsubscribe mechanisms (List-Unsubscribe) reduces complaint rates, addressing the issue indirectly.
Key considerations
- Implement Unique Identifiers: Ensure your email system embeds unique identifiers in email headers for FBL matching.
- Monitor Complaint Rates: Track and analyze complaint rates to identify and address deliverability issues.
- Prioritize Easy Unsubscribe: Make it easy for users to unsubscribe to reduce the likelihood of complaints and FBL triggers.
Expert view
Expert from Spam Resource explains that direct decoding of Comcast's FBL email addresses is generally not possible. Instead, focus on matching the FBL data with identifiers you've embedded in your email headers. These unique identifiers allow you to identify and unsubscribe the user within your system, bypassing the need to decode the Comcast address.
5 Feb 2025 - Spam Resource
Expert view
Expert from Word to the Wise explains the importance of List-Unsubscribe headers but does not address the decoding of Comcast-specific FBL email addresses. The focus is on implementing easy unsubscribe mechanisms to reduce complaint rates, which indirectly addresses the goal of unsubscribing users who trigger FBLs.
20 Nov 2023 - Word to the Wise
What the documentation says
4 technical articles
The documentation consistently states that decoding Comcast's obfuscated FBL email addresses is not addressed or supported. The focus is on leveraging the data provided within the FBL reports, such as headers and other identifiers, to identify and unsubscribe users via internal subscriber management systems. General FBL documentation outlines report structure but does not provide decoding solutions, while specific platforms like Microsoft SNDS focus on sender reputation and complaint rates.
Key findings
- No Direct Decoding: None of the documentation provides methods for directly decoding Comcast's masked FBL email addresses.
- Focus on FBL Data: The emphasis is on utilizing the available data within the FBL reports to identify users.
- Internal Systems are Key: Senders should rely on their internal subscriber management systems to correlate FBL data with user accounts.
- General FBL Information Only: General FBL documentation outlines report structure and standards but doesn't address provider-specific obfuscation.
Key considerations
- Data Integration: Ensure seamless integration of FBL data into your internal subscriber management system.
- Identifier Mapping: Establish robust mapping mechanisms between identifiers in your emails and user accounts.
- System Design: Design your system to handle FBL data and unsubscribe users based on available information.
- Limited External Support: Recognize that external documentation provides limited support for decoding provider-specific obfuscation methods.
Technical article
Documentation from Comcast Postmaster explains that Comcast uses a proprietary feedback loop (FBL) mechanism. While they don't explicitly detail decoding the masked email, they emphasize that senders should use the information provided in the FBL data, including the obfuscated email and other headers, to identify and unsubscribe complaining users based on their internal subscriber management systems.
11 Apr 2023 - Comcast Postmaster
Technical article
Documentation from RFC explains that an email feedback report (FBL) is a mechanism by which a recipient reports that a particular message is unsolicited. While it outlines the structure of such reports, it doesn't address the decoding of sender-specific obfuscated email addresses but rather focuses on the standard format of reporting.
4 Oct 2022 - RFC 3848
Are abuse reports and feedback loops (FBLs) still useful in email marketing, and how do they work with different email clients?
Are there any current issues with Yahoo FBL emails?
Can ESP clients sign up for Validity FBL and how do they validate their IPs/domains?
How are Gmail and Yahoo enforcing unsubscribe requests, and what factors do they consider for compliance?
How can I accurately monitor complaint rates for email marketing using Google Postmaster Tools, Yahoo FBL, and my ESP?
How can I contact Yahoo's postmaster team for FBL access and troubleshoot setup issues?
How can I gain access to Yahoo's Campaign and Performance Feeds as an ESP?
How do email service providers process feedback loop (FBL) emails to identify users and manage suppressions?
How do ESPs collect Yahoo FBL data using double DKIM signing?
