Based on a comprehensive analysis of expert opinions, email marketer experiences, and technical documentation, xmr3.com appears to be a questionable email sending platform. While seemingly associated with OpenText through MessageReach, evidence suggests xmr3.com lacks transparency, potentially engages in practices like snowshoe spamming, has questionable contact information, and might be connected to industries with poor sending reputations such as payday loans. Experts and marketers alike caution against using platforms with these characteristics due to the potential for deliverability issues, blacklisting, and damage to sender reputation.
10 marketer opinions
Analysis of available information suggests significant concerns regarding the legitimacy and reliability of xmr3.com as an email sending platform. While seemingly connected to OpenText, a reputable company, xmr3.com exhibits several red flags, including associations with questionable industries like payday loans, a lack of transparency in pricing and sign-up processes, and potential use of 'snowshoe spamming' techniques. Experts recommend caution, advising users to prioritize reputable ESPs with transparent practices to ensure deliverability and avoid blacklisting.
Marketer view
Email marketer from Marketing Forum recalls xmr3.com being associated with Premier Global Services, which had a less-than-stellar reputation, especially in the early 2000s. She suggests further investigation is warranted before trusting the platform.
16 Feb 2025 - Marketing Forum
Marketer view
Email marketer from StackExchange Marketing points out that while xmr3.com redirects to OpenText, OpenText is a large enterprise software company and not traditionally an ESP. They suggest xmr3.com might be a smaller division or an acquired entity, but its legitimacy as a standalone ESP is questionable.
26 Apr 2023 - StackExchange Marketing
8 expert opinions
Experts express significant concerns regarding the legitimacy of xmr3.com as an email sending platform. They highlight associations with industries known for poor sending practices, like payday loans, and point out the lack of a legitimate web presence. The contact information for xmr3.com is atypical, and while it links to OpenText, OpenText itself doesn't offer ESP-like services. The platform appears to be engaged in practices like snowshoe spamming and uses shared IP pools, which are red flags. The general consensus is to avoid platforms lacking transparency, as they can damage your sending reputation.
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suspects that xmr3.com is not a real ESP, pointing to its association with payday loans and the lack of a genuine web presence. She notes links from the domain a decade ago show spam and scams.
12 Jun 2022 - Email Geeks
Expert view
Expert from Email Geeks suggests that MessageReach (xmr3.com's platform) uses a shared IP pool supported by other senders. He also notes evidence of other brands sending from those IPs.
6 May 2022 - Email Geeks
4 technical articles
Documentation suggests xmr3.com, associated with OpenText's MessageReach, is primarily a customer communications management platform rather than a dedicated ESP. ARIN data indicates questionable abuse contact information for its IP range, raising spam concerns. Talos Intelligence data suggests potential 'snowshoe spamming' activity. Spamhaus has listed some of its IPs on their blocklist, further indicating involvement in spam activities.
Technical article
Documentation from OpenText Website states that MessageReach (associated with xmr3.com) is a communication platform that supports various messaging channels. It does not explicitly advertise itself as a mass email sending platform or ESP but focuses on customer communications management.
28 May 2024 - OpenText Website
Technical article
Documentation from Talos Intelligence suggests that the IP ranges associated with xmr3.com may exhibit patterns consistent with 'snowshoe spamming,' a technique used to distribute spam across multiple IP addresses to avoid detection.
2 Apr 2023 - Talos Intelligence
Are custom sending domains worth the money and effort?
Can an ESP allow its users to use the ESP's physical address in marketing emails under CAN-SPAM?
Can I use the same sending domain with multiple ESPs?
Can I use the same subdomain for multiple email sending platforms?
Does using Microsoft O365 for business email affect email deliverability?
How can I identify the ESP used to send a spam email using the email headers?